The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust. The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog. What is smog? Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr
Comments
As we all know, regulations don't stop people from doing marvelous stuff. This case is tricky because it's strongly connected with chemicals. To grow more food people will try different things. Especially at the beggings of this business people might place their profits over customers health.
2. Yes, I think it is possible. They use natural and safe methods for growing food.
3. It is impossible to exclude such an opportunity, people most often think about their own profit, and not about how their products will be beneficial to human health. Moreover, with the use of such methods, it is possible to grow more plants in a short period of time.
The likelihood that most farms will look so very high. Obviously, farms will remain in their original form. There will always be many eccentrics who pursue naturalness and old trends.
Can you imagine a situation where food grown in containers will be healthier than the one we get from regular fields?
I have little faith in this opportunity. Already many times there were cases that began to sell products, and they showed their harmful effects after a long period of time. Like, for example, gene modifications, initially everyone thought they were a great idea.
Are you afraid that companies like this will do some serious food modifications to make their products tastier or more sustainable without worrying about the long-term impact on their client's health?
No one will allow farms to do this thoughtlessly, usually, the institutes are engaged in changes at the gene level. And nowadays they first carry out all kinds of tests, although this does not guarantee that the product is harmless.
I do believe that food produced that way is indeed healthy and can be even better than traditionaly grown food.
Lastly I'd have to mention it is possible that something bad may be a result of altering production techniques, but it's nothing to be worried about in case of square roots methods