Skip to main content

Week 9 [10.12-16.12.18] Artificial diamonds vs "real" diamons


For most of human history, diamonds have been the ultimate luxury item. Useful, beautiful, hard to come by, and impossible to recreate. Most of them formed a billion or more years ago, deep in the Earth's mantle. Way down there, the pressure and heat are just right to crystallize carbon into diamond instead of graphite. It's that crystalline structure that gives diamonds their unique durability. They shot to the surface long ago by volcanic eruptions, and the abrupt drop in temperature locked all those bonds into place forever.


Diamonds are dramatic and improbable, so they're immensely valuable. Except, that part about being impossible to recreate, it's not true anymore. Historically, the diamond industry has a lot to answer for. It operated like a large, price-fixing cartel for most of the 20th century. It's implicated in horrifying conflicts in Africa, and elsewhere. And it's done significant environmental damage. This we know. But these days, this industry is grappling with a whole other curveball.

Man-made diamonds are on the rise and fast. They're cheaper than natural diamonds, and they're not knockoffs. Both natural diamond and a synthetic diamond are diamonds. They are composed of a carbon in a cubic structure. It's kind of extremely difficult right now, to separate them up visually.

The first method that worked, high-pressure high temperature, or HPHT, relies on a reaction chamber heated up to 1600 degrees Celsius and as much pressure as you would feel on your fingertip if you balanced a commercial airliner on it. HPHT technology basically is mimicking the natural process, how the diamonds formin the Earth's mantle.

A more recent technique called chemical vapor deposition accomplishes the same task, and at much lower pressure and temperature. The process involves methane gas and microwaves. And honestly, it's beyond confusing. The Gemological Institute of America likes to describe it as carbon atoms floating down like snow and accumulating or depositing on a tiny diamond seed. 

Since the 1950s, most lab-grown diamonds have been small and dark in color, so they've been used to make things like saw blades and drill bits. In the past six or so years, the technology has improved dramatically, making synthetic diamonds bigger, clearer, more pure and next to impossible to tell apart from natural diamonds. Which is fine for drill bit manufacturers, but it puts the jewelry industry on notice.



Chinese companies, in particular, are poised to flood the market with smaller diamonds. They've historically been focused on industrial uses, but as oil drilling slows down worldwide, they could easily pivot, overwhelming jewelry supply. In one run, they probably can grow 10, 20 carats small mini diamonds, but it takes only a few hours to produce that many amounts of gem quantities, small stones. They can produce a 200,000 carat of diamond-like this in one month.



Some consumers really want something that's natural, that's mined from the Earth, they like the history of diamonds that are created billions of years ago. That has a certain meaning to them. And then other customers are really excited about the environmentally responsible characteristic of lab diamonds, that there's no need for additional mining. That's a big draw. 

  1. Do you think that artificial diamonds should count as real diamonds?
  1. What another useful thing we can do with them in your opinion?
  1. Do you treat them as a luxury or you don’t care about it?

Comments

Filip Sawicki said…
Yes artificial diamonds should count as real diamonds, just because it’s be almost impossible to differentiate. Both of them share the same physical and chemical properties so there is no reason to choose between one or another. Diamonds are essential components in laboratorial equipment such as high pressure systems, high energy lasers and optical apparatuses. I don’t really care about diamonds, as they are just pieces of optimally spread carbon atoms 😊
I think that artificial diamonds should be count as real diamonds. I also heard that mining diamonds inflicts conflicts and ruins the environment. In my opinion doing such things just to fulfill someone's desire to have diamond ring is absurd.
I am not sure where diamonds can be used, apart from jewellery and industry equipment like saw blades and drill bits.
To be honest I don’t care about diamonds as a luxury good. Even if i was extremely rich, I wouldn’t buy them.
Unknown said…


Do you think that artificial diamonds should count as real diamonds?

Is H2O different from other H20? No, it is not. So the artificial diamonds are diamonds. For me, there is no difference. Maybe because I don't believe in this whole "history of diamonds created so many years ago in deeps of Earth". It is just a piece of coal that many people say should be worth absurdness amount of money. For me, it is not even that pretty.

What another useful thing we can do with them in your opinion?

I have no idea, I am not material engineer. They are kind of sturdy material, but for tips of things. You wouldn't be able to make a bridge with them, would you?

Do you treat them as a luxury or you don’t care about it?

If I had a lot of money, I would by one, toss it into pure, liquid oxygen and see it burn. Just for fun.
But being more serious... They don't appeal to me.

Unknown said…
Yes, they should, because if they were created in the same conditions in the lab as in nature then these products can be considered identical.
I don't know about all the useful applications of diamonds but I know that they are used in optical components, particularly they serve as a protective coating for infrared optics in harsh environments.
I simply don't care and I don't think of them as a luxury. But it's good to see that technological progress allows us to create diamonds in artificial conditions without the need to harvest them by drilling.
Well, considering them equal makes good only for manufacturing, like was already mentioned in optics, tools and industry equipment, since creating them artificially makes diamonds overall much cheaper. It also ruins the whole jewelry industry, since creating them artificially makes them a lot cheaper. I think that jewel manufacturers will have to launch a "Only natural diamonds" campaign, allowing artificially grown ones to be used in the jewels but sold for a relatively low price, whilst leaving the natural ones for a classical jewels. Although at some point all the works for mining diamonds will eventually be seized. Simply because of their irrelevance.
Peter Clemenza said…
Why bother with a "natural" diamond if the "artificial" looks, does, feels, and is structurally the same as one formed "naturally"?

It's some hilarious irony that people are working so hard to defend their selfish and malicious efforts for identical rocks that could've been produced without any bloodshed.
Theres a difference so they can make a premium on the "natural" diamonds so they can make more money, and shitty one here is natural so you have to pay more for this one instead of the flawless one which looks twice as good and half the price.
Cezary Róg said…
Diamond is diamond so it should count the same no matter whether it's artificial or real. For me, the process doesn't matter if the quality and the structure is the same. Diamonds are the most durable products on planet earth. I don't think I can find a new thing to do with them. Do I treat diamonds as a luxury? Well, I don't care. For me, it's just a shiny thing. Of course, they are expensive, but it's just a thing. A small thing that costs a lot, and doesn't bring anything to life.
I think that ability to create artificial diamonds that share all the quirks of real ones should lower the prices of both. Diamonds can be used in manufacturing and production in an incredible number of ways, thus it is cool that there is a way to create one. I am rather ascetic person but i would lie if i tell that that i do not feel some weird feeling like "this little stone costs tonz of money".
Bartosz Barnat said…
I think that artifact diamonds should count as real diamonds because it would be almost impossible to find out if it is a real diamond or a lab created one. I would like it to never happend because diamonds are something increadible that has history and is like a king in jevelarry but if lab created diamonds would be banned from production there would be a lot of illegal activities connected with them.

I don't know what we could do with this accomplishment with science, I dont know where it would be useful.

I think diamnods are luxury that many people can only dream about which is a little bit bad in the world but yes I thik it's a luxury and there is no second thoughts about it.
IF we all switch to artificial diamonds then entire blood lined and slavery lined business goes out the door so hell yes. Personally i dont think diamonds are any special i would even say they are one of the most dull stones to pick.
I dont really think there is anything useful left to do with diamonds as a material they are easy to crush not easy to work on, i dont know man.
Unknown said…
As long as artificial diamonds have the same properties and look the same as natural diamonds, I don't see a reason why they wouldn't count as real diamonds. Artificial diamonds have a variety of industrial uses, and besides the ones already mentioned, they are for example used in diamond paste, which is highly effective at polishing various surfaces. I personally do think about diamonds as a luxury, but it's propably because diamonds are commonly thought of as expensive, even though in reality they are much more commonplace than most people think.
Unfortunately, no, i don't think that artificial diamonds will have the same value as real diamonds. Real diamonds are made by nature, that's why they are rare and cost a lot, but artificial diamonds it is just a waste of our time. I'm not an expert in diamonds, but you i heard that polishing other stones with diamonds is a good thing to explore more nowadays. Also, i've read somewhere, that cutting glass with diamonds is a useful thing too. Honestly, i don't care about them. Maybe, when i get 1 billion dollars, i will buy one.
Maciej Nowak said…
I wouldn't personally care if my diamond was natural or artificial if they both of them would look the same and would have the same price. Natural diamonds could be worse as some of them could be so called "bloody diamonds". Well, I have no idea of any new useful way of using diamonds, and if I did, then I would probably earn a lot of money. I have never had any particular need of having diamonds, but they are definitely a luxury and a way to show off.
I believe that artificial diamonds should not be counted as real diamonds.

- in jewelry
- in the technique of grinding and polishing expensive stones and cutting glass
- in mining as driller bits, drills

I treat them as a luxury. Diamonds are very expensive, but there are still people who buy them. I would call them the good of Veblen. I have read many articles about fraudsters who sell counterfeit diamonds or rob people of money who want to buy them, so be very careful.
luxury ? Diamonds are worthless. Prior to the early 1900's there were rare and valuable, but upon the discovery of the great diamond trunks in South Africa, they became common. In order to protect the diamond market, the diamond producers consolidated into DeBeers who not only conspired to keep the price of diamonds high, but also propagandized countries like Japan to associate diamonds with marriage, something not previously part of their culture. You are literally throwing your money away and funding a corporate oligopoly when you buy a diamond.
I’m sorry for my cynicism but I think many people who claim they don’t care about synthetic diamonds (or precious gems at all), would happily choose natural diamonds over synthetic diamonds (or no diamonds) when buying e.g. an engagement ring for their fiancée if they afforded it.

In my opinion, synthetic diamonds should be treated in the same way in industrial applications but should be treated differently in jewellery. It’s not only the looks that matter to people, but also the history. If you think about them as pieces of thousands of dinosaurs collapsed into a single small stone, it might change your attitude.

I think I pretty much proved I treat them as the luxury that’s beyond my reach. I’m not a big materialist but I’m not a hypocrite either. I believe asking such a question to people who can’t afford to buy it is pointless because their answers are biased towards that inability. Luxury is not a rational term, it’s driven mostly by social status and personal wealth. Perspective matters.
It does mean almost nothing to me sooooo... If i had to choose id say, if they are almost identicle and are both usefull they why shouldn't we think both are real? I'm not saying they should cost same in jewelery as its not only look that make you buy them but for any other stuff, i wouldn't care less if they were used just in jewelery but they are one of most important resources right now. I can't say i treat them like garbage as i can't afford to buy one just like that and also they are too important as a resource for many industries.
I think that if current technology level allow create artificial diamonds that can't be detected as unnatural in this case there no reasons to count in another way. In general I didn't understand why we trying to idealize something and pay for this huge money.

I think that this accessory can be beautiful but this is didn't mean that there can be reason to pay for it so much when there was alternatives that can be even better and looks better than diamonds.
This comment has been removed by the author.
1. Not absolutely. Because, artificial diamonds remain artificial. Also it is worth specifying it. Maybe someone wants to buy original diamond which was made the nature. In that case the stone will stand more expensively, that is is appreciated above.

2. It is possible to make much useful things. But I have no idea on this subject.

3. Actually I am not interested in the matter. On it for me it has no bigger value.
Not like I care much about diamonds, at least as a jewelry goes.
Right now diamonds in jewelry are highly valued. But a funny thing about diamonds is, they are called Veblen goods. If their price was low, demand would sharply drop as well. No one would buy cheap diamonds. They are status goods - if you're rich, you buy diamonds, if you aren't, you don't. It's like a Rolex watch or a Maybach car.
If their price drops, so any middle-class person can buy as many as he wants - not many people would buy them. Because why spend cash on them if you can buy a faster car, or a newer iPhone or a better TV. And if anyone can buy it, you don't do it for status reasons, they wouldn't be valued and demand would drop sharply.
I actually read once: women don't really care about the diamond itself as much as they care about the pain you felt buying it for say 3-4 months salary, their brain doesn't say: "I have a diamond", but "He bought me a diamond".
So if we'll have artificially created diamonds cheaper then real ones, it will probably not change much - either real diamonds will still be considered true diamonds and highly valued or demand for diamonds will drop sharply and we will have some other status jewelry object which is pricey and hard to obtain.
Aleksander Wiza said…
As far as I'm concerned the real diamonds should not be considered on equal terms with those of artificial origin. The artificial ones are characterised by their unflawed symmetry whilst those created during millenias of tectonic plates shifts often have minor imperfections deep in the carbon structure of the stone itself, often causing slight spot discolourment.

2. I've heard that calibration of many scientific apparatures requires the density of a diamond or the way it refracts light beams, however I doubt I could explain specific use without proper research on the matter.

3. I do find it a luxury, however it does not mean I'd not invest in precious stones. The interesting thing about the diamonds is the hermetic society of the jewellers that trade them, years ago I've found a book explaining the ways of gem traders in details, though I cannot remember the name of either the author or the title.

Piotr Ciesla said…
It’s hard to tell for me but I think that artificial diamonds should be treated as real. If they look the same, have the same chemical and physical structure. So in day to day life there is no difference.

I’m not sure but i think they are popular in grinding discs. They are harder then almost everything.

Diamonds always were luxurious items. Only the richest people could afford them. Today it’s kind of the same. You don’t need diamond
Unknown said…
I believe that yes. Especially one which produced with HPHT technology, because of it basically the same process as real diamonds creates.
I believe it has a lot of uses, we can use artificial diamonds wherever we need to cut something or have a very sharp surface.
I do. But I think that once technology of producing synthetic diamonds becomes more and more cheap and synthetic diamonds will become more popular and more affordable it wouldn't be so luxury. Because previously it was treated luxuries mainly due to it hard to find, especially big one.
1. Do you think that artificial diamonds should count as real diamonds?
No, because... they are artificial ! Those original have something special in them , and that's the reason why they are so expensive. For me it would be great to have 2 options - to buy original diamond, which is very expensive, or artificial one, cheaper.

2. What another useful thing we can do with them in your opinion?
Place them in jewelery and make it cheaper !

3. Do you treat them as a luxury or you don’t care about it?
I don't really care - it's hard to me to understand why jewelery is so expensive, and why two identical rings have completely different prices... for me it's just a stone.
To me it doesn't matter whether diamond is created naturally or artificially. As long as it serves its purpose of course. Personally I have never been interested in jewelery but maybe with lower prices of diamonds we could use them for some other purposes. On the other hand we are already capable of manufacturing some materials that are really durable so maybe we don't need those diamonds at all?
Unknown said…
In my opinion artificial diamonds are the same as real diamonds so they should count also the same. For the most people diamonds are out of reach so it doesn’t count where they come from. Diamonds are known for their unusual properties such as extraordinary hardness. As the only material has a specific hardness of 10 on the Mohs scale. That mineral can’t be scratched with a knife or steel tool. The above feature could be used for the production of kitchen worktops, for instance. As a man I’m not fond of jewellery. I know that I should difference few crystals to purchase engagement ring someday, but I still have time.
Illia Lukisha said…
Do you think that artificial diamonds should count as real diamonds?

I think that diamonds is vastly overrated. And there is no real need for people for using real ones, if they just wanna shiny glossy piece of glass.

What another useful thing we can do with them in your opinion?

I think such durable material can be excellent screen protector.

Do you treat them as a luxury or you don’t care about it?

I don't care. If people tell you that something is expensive that isn't always true, because hype around such kind of materials is nothing else than "everyone loves diamonds, I should have one too".
I think that artificial diamonds should count as real, because they almost look the same and have the same properties. To be honest, you need very professional equipment to say which one is real and which, artificial.
Diamonds can be use in any laboratory during experiments due to their properties, e.g. we can use them as a very sharp knives.
For sure they are expensive. And like every expensive thing on the world, can be treat like luxury. Personally, I’m thinking about them as a luxury product that are amazing in jewelry.
Unknown said…
1. Do you think that artificial diamonds should count as real diamonds?
I think that it should be treated as real diamonds as long as they are pure and perfect as natural ones.
2. What another useful thing we can do with them in your opinion?
hmmm... maybe... using it to produce some tools or something that need to be durable.
3. Do you treat them as a luxury or you don’t care about it?
I treat diamonds as a gemstone. As topaz as sapphire. It need to be expensive, it's beautiful but not my favourite. :) For sure I will buy ring for my gf not with diamond but with emerald :)
In my opinion artificial diamonds should be count as real diamonds because both types of diamonds are... diamonds. So why not?
I have no idea how we can use diamonds. Jewelery of course, but something else? No idea.
Diamonds are overrated and I don't treat them as luxury.
Patryk Górski said…
Do you think that artificial diamonds should count as real diamonds?

Yes, why not? I know that diamonds are definition of luxury, but who will tell which one is real, when the difference is that small?

What another useful thing we can do with them in your opinion?

I don't know. At first jewelery comes to my mind, but nothing else.

Do you treat them as a luxury or you don’t care about it?

Personally I don't care about them - but I know that there may be a lot of people, for which diamonds are very important and that's fine. Everyone can have their "passion" :)
Unknown said…
I think that artificial diamonds should count as real diamonds.
Maybe we could use them in drills?
I don't care about it.
Do you think that artificial diamonds should count as real diamonds?
Yes. If the difference is unnoticable then they are just the same. We shouldn't specify which are real and which are not because of history, but because of its structure

What another useful thing we can do with them in your opinion?
I think the same things we did before. Maybe as smart watches or mobile phones screens?

Do you treat them as a luxury or you don’t care about it?
Nope. I don't care. But I'm pretty sure that I don't understand jewellery enough
Unknown said…
I don't think that lab diamonds should cost like real diamonds because in my opinion their value has differences because of a limited quantity of real diamonds. If something is limited it is more luxury and more expensive. That's the rule.

Maybe in the future lab diamonds should entirely replace real diamonds, like faux fur should replace natural fur. We will see.
Unknown said…
Thank! your information is very helfull. i will tell you about Lab Grown Diamond and how you will find the most valuable diamonds in your budget.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and natura...

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds...

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?