Skip to main content

Week 7 [26.11-2.12.18] Healing the worst diseases or designing children

Healing the worst diseases, removal of genetic defects, but also designing children, changing their hair color or intelligence quotient. Gene editing is one of the greatest discoveries of recent times.

Scientists are very successful in their laboratories, amateurs experiment in their homes. The only question is whether we should do it at all?
Is the editing of genes morally acceptable?

Gene editing is nothing new, but the breakthrough was the discovery of the CRISPR method, which was first discovered by Francisco Mojica, a scientist at the University of Alicante in Spain. He proposed that CRISPRs serve as part of the bacterial immune system, defending against invading viruses.

This method can easily modify humans (and not only) genes.  A scientist can program special virus to find and edit concrete mutation in our DNA as a molecular scalpel. It can provide treatment for many genetic diseases.
Clinical trials on humans are already under way for example AGTC in the US currently enrolling patients with rare inherited eye conditions. In China it is much easier to make trials on humans so chinese scientists used CRISPR gene editing on 86 patients.

Furthermore you can do it on your own. Josiah Zayner’s Odin company sells “DIY Bacterial Gene Engineering CRISPR Kit” which costs only $159.


I think it’s dangerous, because it enables everyone to make mutated bacteria.
If you consider ordering this kit, you have to know that the Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority tested two kits and found them to contain potentially pathogenic bacteria. But even the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control concluded that there was little to worry about—that “the risk of infection by the contaminating strains in the kit is low for the users … assuming that they are healthy people.”

Gene editing deals not only with the treatment of diseases, but also enables changing babies before they are born. In July, Nuffield Council recommended changes in law which enable parents to modify their children especially to avoid genetic diseases, but they don’t exclude cosmetic changes like hair color change, eyes…, or changing IQ, but this can increase the stigmatism in the society (not everyone will have enough money).
In the US 83% of citizens are against editing genes.

There is also some information that CRISPR can have some negative effects. According to ABC News science reporter Belinda Smith:
“Cutting the wrong stretch of DNA could, for instance, switch on a cancer-causing gene or disable another that suppresses tumours.”

Questions:
  1. What do you think about gene editing? Is it moral?
  2. What restrictions and changes would you like to add to the Polish law connected with gene editing?
  3. Would you like to order mentioned kit to learn this at home? Why / why not?
  4. If you had a disease and they were currently recruiting for a clinical trial, would you sign up? 

Sources:


Comments

>What do you think about gene editing? Is it moral?

I think that if your intentions are good - I mean you want to help others - then yes, it's good. If you want to create an ultimate soldier that will help you conquer world, then it's bad thing :P

>What restrictions and changes would you like to add to the Polish law connected with gene editing?

I don't think that I'm good person to say it, I'm not a lawyer.

> Would you like to order mentioned kit to learn this at home? Why / why not?

Yes, because it looks super interesting and I may be able to learn something new.

>If you had a disease and they were currently recruiting for a clinical trial, would you sign up?

If it would be may final hope - yes, why not?
Actually I will Google this topic further and consider ordering the kit myself, thanks for the info!

And, if it is not already obvious, yes, gene editing is absolutely moral and even should be done. Human is the most advanced creature, top of evolution. It is normal to possess such a power to change one s own code. Imagine that there no longer be born handicapped, with pathologies, even if the parents were not the healthiest and most responsible people, drinking and smoking while pregnant.
Piotr Ciesla said…
I think it all depends on whether you motivation is morally ok. For example shooting people with guns without reason is morally bad but defending yourself with gun is I think morally ok. at least in my opinion.It's the same thing with gene editing if you want to save someone life or treat untreatable desiese its morally good. If you want to destroy humans with ultra deadly bacteria its morally bad.

I think treatment with gene editing should be legal in Poland. On the other hand if we consider that you can artificially change eye or hair color I don't know. kid is not a toy that you can pick. What's more important that you have to give love to it and help it to develop in its own way.

I'm not going to buy this kit. I'm afraid what could come out of it.

It would depend on the risk I would have to take. If it would be rather safe I would go. If I had a cancer and it would be possible to kill it I would go. But if I could lose my life I would have to do think a lot before I decide.
Marcin Zając said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Marcin Zając said…
Thanks for your comment. I agree that morality depends on intentions.
What do you think about changing children IQ or colour of hair, eyes etc. Is it a good intention?
Unknown said…
Proper gene editing is the next step into the future. Of course, we can do so much harm to people, but I think of it as of something promising. We can cure gene-based diseases and invent many new medicines, so I believe it is worth trying, and in the long-term perspective, we will benefit from it.

I fell like I'm not a proper person to answer this question. I don't have enough knowledge about current law regulations.

Yes! I believe that it's something exciting and I'd love to learn more about it. This kit is an excellent start for this topic, and I think it will push peoples interest even further.

I will think twice before signing documents. It's hard to answer this question about knowing what exactly I agree. I mean each clinical trial leads some dangers with it because in most cases it hasn't been tested properly yet.
Iman Masjedi said…
In my opinion, any research or experiment that can contribute to human health and longevity can be useful.Moral or immoral, it can be used only in the way they operate by whom.
Because I do not know about the Polish laws, I can not comment on what restrictions are being added to it.
If there is a clinical trial, I will definitely register and try to help research in this area. All of us, as long as we are healthy, have never thought about treating people with genetic problems.
Marcin Zając said…
Thanks. Good comparison with gun. I also fully agree with you that child is not a toy.
Marcin Zając said…
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Of course always it's good think/read twice before signing documents.
Marcin Zając said…
Thank you for your comment.
I'm glad you found the post interesting. Ofcourse it will be great if there no longer be born handicapped, with pathologies...
Marcin Zając said…
Thanks for sharing, you have an interesting take on this topic.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and naturally.

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?