Skip to main content

Week 5 [12-18.11.2018] LootBox - gambling and embodied evil or is there anything to be afraid of?

LootBox - gambling and embodied evil or is there anything to be afraid of?

Lootboxes has been the hottest topic  in the industry recently, but not everyone is aware of the impact it has on the environment. Practicall,y everyone associates a series of games such as FIFA, Counter Strike or Battlefront. It is possible that everyone has bought one of these games at least once, so they may have noticed the existence of the so-called LootBox. For those who do not know what it is, this is an introduction to the topic

LootBox - in computer games this is a box containing random, virtual objects. Depending on the production, it can be obtained by progress in the game or by buying with virtual (in-game) or real money with micropayments. In addition, some lootboxes contain only cosmetic items that do not give an advantage to the player, while other items may affect the balance of the game.




https://www.eurogamer.net
 


On the one hand, it is very unethical to sell games at full price and then press microtransactions. According to Juniper Research, a company analyzing market trends, in 2018, consumers from all over the world will spend about 30 billion US dollars on lootboxes and skin trade.

Aggressive system of micropayments made the topic of mailboxes reach the so-called mainstream. It was the interest of politicians, including Belgians, who had already demanded firm action from the European Union. Nothing has come out of it so far, but the Belgians decided to check that the boxes do not violate their internal law. For this purpose two issues were examined: whether the purchase can lead to profit or loss and whether the “bet"  depends on the luck or skills of the players. It quickly became apparent  is the matter to gambling law and should therefore be banned.

Belgium is another country that has addressed this issue. Earlier, the Dutch stated that opening boxes in FIFA 18, Dota 2, PUBG or Rocket League is nothing more than gambling, which resembles machines in the style of one-handed bandits. Players can draw items that are of real value and can be sold. The Dutch gave game developers  the deadline until 20th June to remove the system of boxes and parcels.

 On the other side of the Atlantic in the USA, opening boxes in games were not considered gambling. Despite this, many states, such as Hawaii and Washington, intend to look into the matter and develop their own laws. Interestingly, Belgium has not set a date yet by which game developers must remove mailboxes from their productions. It is also worth reminding that the subject of micropayments was also considered by the Polish government. Soon boxes may also be banned in the country on the Vistula.

On the other hand, if someone is reasonable and has his own reason, he knows how much he can spend and either we consider that something is worth a fixed amount and we buy it or not - and we pass by.


Have you ever bought one of the above mentioned games? What's your opinion?
Have you ever bought a LootBox? Why?
Do you think it is dangerous?

Comments

1. Have you ever bought one of the above mentioned games? What's your opinion?
Yes, Fifa and Counter-Strike. They can be played with friends, CS mostly online, Fifa, however, both, offline and online. I believe that they are a great way to spend time with colleagues and fun to play on your own as they are a healthy form of competition.

2. Have you ever bought a LootBox? Why?
I have, for a different game. It is hard to explain why, perhaps I was hoping to get lucky and loot something uncommon.

3. Do you think it is dangerous?
It can drag young people in very easily. Just like gambling. Loot-boxes make you ‘try your luck’ and, the thrill often experienced while opening them, can be very addictive.
Lukasz Mroczek said…
Yes, of course! I’ve bought Counter Strike and I often buy each Fifa. Those games are popular because of it’s online gaming possibilities. People around the world can meet together in virtual football match or fight on ‘de_dust’ :D Also you can do this with your schoolmates when you get back to home after lessons. It’s great entertainment or time-killer but there are people that work as a professional game player.
I’ve bought LootBox few times but… there was nothing interesting inside and of course it wasn’t worth anything. I wanted to have something special but it’s a fake :D
It’s hard to say whether it is dangerous or not. Of course it may be for some people that can’t control themselves because it may be like gambling.
Artem Lipovatyi said…
1. Of the games mentioned above, I bought only FIFA 18. The game is still quite interesting, but only when you play with friends. As far as I know, this game is very popular in the world and there are many FIFA tournaments.

2. Never. I do not consider this a necessity. Why pay for pixels? I never wanted to stand out in games or get an advantage. Unfortunately, more and more developers add lootboxes to their games.

3. I think it can be dangerous only for the game because it can kill the interest in it and developers will be focused mainly on adding such unnecessary things just to earn more money not making the game more attractive. Also, it can make some problems for families because children can unknowingly make in-game purchases, spending their parents’ money. There are many cases where people spent hundreds or even thousands of dollars on simple skins that have no effect on the gameplay. They can also go into debt, thereby endangering themselves.
Have you ever bought one of the above mentioned games? What's your opinion?
I've bought Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and also Counter-Strike: Source. As far as I know, loot boxes (cases) are present only in CS: GO, but in this instance, I don't mind them because all you can get is a new look for your weapon/character.
Have you ever bought a LootBox? Why?
When it was super popular, I bought approximately three loot boxes. I did that to distinguish my character from the others.
Do you think it is dangerous?
Well for some people buying loot boxes becomes gambling and great business (they get something for lower price, and if it is rare they sell it for a vast amount of money), but I think it is more of a threat for game development environment because I've noticed that some companies focus too much on making money on those additional features (like loot boxes) instead of developing the valuable game itself.
never bot a single loot box and not intended to. While some might argue that:
1) As long as the contents are purely cosmetic and do not affect game's balance (Overwatch, Dota2, CS:GO), there are absolutely Ok, and do not force the player to spend any additional money in order to success at the game, while some others (Team Fortress 2, Magic:The gathering, Hearthstone, FIFA, and yes, I cannot go past our "Beloved" Star Wars: Battlefront) are basically force the player to spend additional money in order not to suffer from disadvantage against other players. It even has a term, p2w -- pay to win.
2) Other say that all the lootboxes are ok, regardless of whether they affect the balance of the game as long as the game itself is free to play.
3) Finally, some might say that all purchasable lootboxes should be banned, and in game content be available with just simply progressing the game.

If you are a person that have never heard of the videogames, which is astronomically unlikely, consider lootboxes as if you were watching a movie, and suddenly you get a message "To unlock the ending, please purchase our super-duper cinema pass for only 2.99$!" That is, what basically is going on right now with the games. And guess what? People are buying them and this seems like won't change anytime soon, due to the huge profits developers get.

My opinion? Look at the game Heroes Of The Storm. It is absolutely free to play, it has a vast amount of cosmetics available in loot boxes, and it does not affect the balance at all. Meaning that a player is never forced to spend a single cent on the game (and it is actually pretty decent game itself! For many it simply replaced Dota or LoL). And it still gives the developers a huge profit. I see the solution to the lootboxes just as it is in this game.
Unknown said…
I've bought FIFA, but I have never used FIFA Ultimate Team where are loot boxes. FIFA games are really funny to play, especially to play with your friends, but you can also play online with other people.

I have never bought a loot box because I think that loot boxes are not worth to be bought.

I think it can become really dangerous in the future if We let game developers do what they want. We already have let them cut out game parts just to be put on DLC.
Foodocado said…
I am a big fan of FPS games, so Counter-Strike 1.6 and then Counter-Strike: Global Offensive were 'must have' for me. I think, everyone with a similar age to me had the opportunity to play one of those games.

The newest edition of this game (Global Offensive) introduced skins which allow customizing the weapons, hand gloves etc. We can buy them either using marketplace or by buying loot boxes.

Not once I was trying my chances in loot boxes, but I've never got anything interesting. It was just a waste of the money. As soon as I realized that, I stopped buying them.

I think it might be dangerous for young people. They often spend their parents' money, so they don't care. They also count on easy earnings. Nothing more wrong!
I have played fifa but i never bought lootboxes or in any other game. For me it was just unnecessary to have fun so i didn't bother. After all it's is still gambling. Of course i think it is dangerouse and not only for kids but for adults also. Gambling is addicting and it is always created so you think you will win something next time. But in this kind of gambling it is even worst as you cant even win anything real. You are always loosing as you get nothing that will make your life better. And i don't care if somone spend 100$ per month if he earns like 10000$ but if a kid is stealing his parents credit card to buy something that is not even real then how can you not call it dangerous.
Unknown said…
I have the same with LootBox, as if everyone knows that nothing will go wrong, but is still deluded.
Nataliya Tkach said…
Have you ever bought one of the above mentioned games? What's your opinion?
Yeah, I bought Rocket League when it came out, and then I always bought DLC with cars. It is always more interesting to play a multiplayer game with someone.

Have you ever bought a LootBox? Why?
Yes, but only for the Overwatch game. Like all who bought, I wanted to get all the possible legendary items.

Do you think it is dangerous?
Yes, it's like modern gambling, I got sucked, but I stopped in time.
Unknown said…
'De_dust' so many great memories. I think this is the most dangerous for young people who cannot determine the value of money, and not only
Unknown said…
You are probably one of the few people who have never bought a LootBox, but admirable. As far as the danger is concerned, I agree with you.
Unknown said…
I've never bought LootBoxes in video games, because they are too random. But I still enjoy to get lucky after opening LootBox and receive some cool stuff. The concept itself is not that bad in my opinion, especially when all you can receive from LootBox is skins, colour schemes and other cosmetic stuff that doesn't influence gameplay. I quit playing Hearthstone when I realized that I can't do much without spending a ton of money for buying boosters.
Seeing the titles like "10-year-old spent 1000$ from his dad card in Clash Royal" shows how dangerous LootBoxes can be, especially for those, who don't understand the value of earned money yet.
Unknown said…
If I remember correctly, I also bought only 3 LootBoxes in CS:GO for the same reason.
Unknown said…
I hope you didn't spend too much on LootBoxy. I had it similarly, but in FIFA I bought two basic packages, but looking at what had gone out, I also realized that it was not worth it.
Unknown said…
Yes, I bought Counter Strike: Global Offensive. Loot boxes in this game don’t affect on gaming process, they contains only visual skins for your items.
Yes, I bought one in Counter Strike. It was Sticker box, it was cheap and with discount, also I shouldn't have bought any keys for this box(it was opening up without any key).
I don’t think that it’s dangerous, but some developers wrong in this matter. If loot box contain only visual skin I see nothing wrong with that. For example Counter Strike and Dota 2, you can play without any skin and gaming process will not change. But make loot box with items which can change gaming process it’s wrong. For example Hearthstone. It’s a card game with loot boxes that contains cards that can easily change gaming process, who donate more has better cards that one who don’t donate.
ExoKuzo said…
I have bought and played Rocket League and Counter Strike GO. In both i have approximately bought 4 maybe 5 keys needed to open the lootboxes. While both games have this damned system in place both of them are great games underneath.

Purely cosmetic lootboxes are dangerous but fine, i mean they are fine as in there is no incentive to buy them besides your personal preferences, and they are dangerous because there are people that are pigeonholed into getting more and more of them and into spending more money if they dont get what they want.
Unknown said…
It's more like treating people not as adults that responsible for their lives but childrens who need protection. Developers doing it since it's profitable and since it doesn't give you advantage in games I played like Dota 2 and CS it seem perfectly fine for me. If developers have more resources they can make better games.
I have bought Counter Strike GO, I almost do not play now. I am totally against those lootboxes - it's evil, and a lot of my friends also agree with me. On the other hand, if you are ready to pay for cosmetic items - do what you want , as long as you happy. I agree with you that it's wrong to sell games at full price and then press microtransactions, developers don't respect their loyal customers and gaming community. The main thing is that they do not affect the balance in games.
No, I have never bought any LootBox, for me, it's stupid to pay for virtual skins and other stuff.
I don't think lootboxes are dangerous , but tendency is bad. I hope lootboxes will be regulated in some way. Most certainly, they will stay in the gaming industry for a long time.
Unknown said…
1. Yes, I bought Rocket League and PUBG. Both are online competitive games and are very enjoyable to play.

2. I've bought a LootBox once and only because it was my brother's birthday and I still had some money left on the gift card that I received some time ago. There was just enough to buy a LootBox and nothing else. I've never bought a LootBox for myself though.

3. I believe it's more annoying than dangerous. Especially when the game requires you to open LootBoxes to progress further in the game or to get a better equipment to not stand out as the weakest in the team.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
I have never bought loot boxes for games that described in the topic. But one time I bought couple packs for Hearthstone. I regretted myself a lot after this because it's one of the stupidest ways to spend money. In my opinion it's even worse than making bets or lose money playing poker.

I don't think loot boxes are dangerous for adult people. If person pay his bills by himself - no problem. It's his choice of wasting his own money. But it changes when loot boxes are bought by kids, that use their's parents credit cards.
I used to play both Counter Strike and Fifa. I do not think that first one has problem with loot boxes. No matter if you pay or not, experience from playing CS will be the same. Buying skins in games like CS makes look of your weapon more fancy, that's it. And I do not think that's a bad thing, a matter of fact in my opinion that's the best way to earn money from game. I've stopped playing CS only because it's so damm popular that if you do not play every day for 2 hours you will be bad at it and now I just don't have time to be such a gamer.
Now let's look at the second game which is Fifa. Looting boxes in that game are pure cancer. Why? Because that's a type of game called P2W - Pay to Win. That means if you are paying real money in Fifa you will get better cards than other players. Just theoretically, cause you can have same cards as person who pays, but you will need 10 or even 20 more time played in game to get it. And that kills game experience if someone can be better just because he have payed extra money.
I have bought Battlefield 3 & 4 from mentioned games. I am not sure if there is loot boxes system implemented, I have never bought anything additional to this games and I didn’t notice any aggressive advertisements to do so. Both games are very good in my opinion and if there are loot boxes they don’t influence gameplay so much. Because of that I have never feel any need for buying loot box, I can handle everything with weapons which I can unlock by playing.
In my opinion if loot box is random this is gambling, but I am not sure if this is the reason why it should be banned. There are a lot of things which are “bad” if overuse, like alcohol, but they are not prohibited. If people can restrain themselves then their usage is nothing wrong.
As a player I don’t like loot boxes for money which give real advantage in game. In my opinion it ruins the gameplay.
Marcin Krupa said…
"Have you ever bought one of the above mentioned games? What's your opinion?"
Simple question, simple answer - no, I haven't.

"Have you ever bought a LootBox? Why?"
Nope. Maybe I will try buying one if I have a game, which I will really enjoy.

"Do you think it is dangerous? "
Sure, I think that is pretty similar to gambling. I think that could be really dangerous for younger players, which don't feel financial responsibility yet. Lootbox are banned in some countrys for a reason.
Unknown said…
I have not bought any of the mentioned games, but I have bought or played games with lootboxes in them. I do not think that lootboxes make a game unfun by themselves, and games with lootboxes can certainly be good games.
I have opened crates in TF2 once or twice, as I wanted to try it out. It was not worth it, and I have not bothered with it since.
Lootboxes can certainly be dangerous, in the same way that gambling is dangerous. If someone can control themselves, then they should be mostly safe, but people who can't (children especially) might end up wasting all of their money only to end up with something with no real value.
s18716 said…
I am very far from the world of video games. I do not even know if it is bad or good. Of course, I, like most, played a very long time ago in the Counter Strike at the level of amateur with friends. But never been a fan of this. Therefore, I never dealt with the purchase of video games, and even more so with the purchase of loot boxes.
I think this is not for me. Everyone has their own preferences. Perhaps this is really fun and so can you have a good time. But it seems to me that this kind of entertainment is actually addictive, since I have heard more than one story about people who were absorbed by video games and various purchases for the characters of these games.
As for danger, I think the dependence on games and the endless upgrade of fictional characters for which you need to lay out a good amount of money, adversely affect underage users. After all, they are mindlessly spending their parents' money and spend their lives in the virtual world. But I repeat, everyone chooses how to manage his time and resources. I have no right to criticize.
Marcin Górski said…
Yes, I bought games as Counter Strike: Global Offensive, PUBG, FIFA series. I always try to not spend much money than "classical" price. It is very difficult situation because it easy rule, if you want have better equipment, special bonuses you have to pay for that. I understand that developers need to earn money but as you mentioned it's gambling. For example, if you pay 2$ for special create and drop something cheaper you think about next transaction... "What if it's my time? It must be better than last time!".
Of course, I spend some money on FIFA coins but I was younger. Nowadays, I am very careful person.
Yes, I think it's dangerous especially for younger players because they often don't understand how gambling is working. I think that parents should control their children.
Unknown said…
1. None from mentioned above, but I saw many people gambling in CS:go. It's terrible when it comes to kids playing with their parents credit cards. Children are naive and that's why gambling can break child.
2. Yup, I have bought many lootboxes in Hearthstone, but it's my own money, never spent parents money on games this way. I can afford additional content once a month so I'm doing it. Not to have adventage. Just to play comfortable cause I can't compense earning gold due to a lack of time. I want to play any deck I want without grind.
3. As I mentioned earlier it's dangerous especially for children. Gambling is addictive and we know about it. It's the same as alcohol, coffee, drugs. Once you tried it's hard to stop. Always keep that in mind, even as an adult
Szymon Gibalski said…

1. Have you ever bought one of the above-mentioned games? What's your opinion?
- Yes, I have bought Counter-Strike to play together with my friends. We had this dream about reaching the Global Elite rank and winning some big tournaments but we ended our journey with this game after losing 3 games.

2. Have you ever bought a LootBox? Why?
- Yes, I have bought LootBoxes in League of Legends because I wanted to earn some rare skins to my favourites champions. Of course I did not get a single skin I wanted and in the end, I lost 50$.

3. Do you think it is dangerous?
- I think it can be dangerous if you cannot control yourself. If you spend for example 10$ a month on LootBoxes it is completely fine. But if you cannot afford to buy something to eat because you spend your whole money in a video game it means you have some serious problems and you need to change it immediately.
I have bought and played FIFA but I only enjoy playing it with my friends in multiplayer mode. Therefore, I’ve never had a need to purchase loot boxes containing players, since FUT just wasn’t attractive for me.

I have, however, bought multiple loot boxes back in the day when I played Call Of Duty Advanced Warfare. I did it for the same reason as it was designed to be done – I was hoping to win some epic gear. I succeeded a couple of times, but the amount of money I threw into loot boxes was totally not worth it.

From a more mature perspective, I agree that loot boxes should be interpreted as gambling — it matches all criteria of being one and is no different than going to a casino to throw money at the gambling machines.
Unknown said…
1. I have a FIFA but I am focused on playing with friends rather than on gambling and buying loot boxes.

2. I have never bought a loot box. I had few of them in Rust game but they given them to me because I have bought this game when it was on early access period. It was nice to open it and got some surprises but I have never bought any loot box on my own.

3. It is dangerous for your wallet just like playing poker. ;)
1. Yes, I have a few Battlefields and the Counter Strike. I play sometimes Battlefield 1 with flatmate. Counter Strike is kinda boring for me. I don’t see the point of lootboxes in fifa, it kills any competitiveness there
2. No. I have never seen the point of it
3. Yes. Mostly for kids. It shouldn’t be persuaded so much to them that as they need it. I agree with Dutch way to handle that problem.
Unknown said…
All of these! I had the pleasure to play with all of these games. I didn't buy a LootBox in any of these though. I preferred to play in singleplayer mode in FIFA, so I didn't have to buy one to beat other players. The color of wielding a weapon is not that important to me to pay for it, but I can understand people who pay for this.

I feel it similar to gambling, so I think it is dangerous. Fortunately in most cases nowadays the only benefit we can get out of most of LootBoxes is a cool skin. Skill it what matters the most, so there is no need to buy one to be good. But, as far as I know, it's not a standard way of thinking about this topic. I can say it's a mature approach to this. Many of my younger sister friend who play these game think different. Children want to be different, plus they want to be better than others, so I can imagine that wealthier parent is the problem here, since you can have more skins than your friends and make fun of not that rich friends.
Yes, I played Counter Strike for a while. For me lootboxes in this game are harmless- you can only get a new skin for your weapons/ glowes and that's it. And the game is nice. Playing with friends is fun but for me the game get's boring after few hours.
I have never bought a lootbox.
Well... lootboxes can be dangerous for young people (and their parents). But I belive that for adults lootboxes are harmless.
Unknown said…
Whole games which author mentioned are known for me. I bought my first FIFA in 2001, when I was only 5 years old. Is was my first game and I played it with my brother so, I have very sentiment. It is a excellent game for parties with guys where you can drink a beer. On the other side we have Counter Strike. Is was my first FPS over which I spent so many time in Internet cafe. This is a unique game in FPS‘s category. The last and also the worst for me is Battlefront. I’m not keen on this game, because you can running and shooting with any destination. I know only LootBox from Counter Strike. This is waste of money, it looks like a gambling - you could buy until you win and it’s never ending story. You can also purchase so many access to LootBox but if you aren’t lucky you will never get what you want. The most disadvantage by buying LootBox is addiction of gambling and you can lose your wealth.
Illia Lukisha said…
Have you ever bought one of the above mentioned games? What's your opinion?
No I didn't. I didn't play games mentioned above.

Have you ever bought a LootBox? Why?
No. Because I don't spend money on game content, that don't have any value.

Do you think it is dangerous?
I think, it's the same as forex or casino, if person don't control expenses, he or she will lose money anywhere else, and not in the game.
1. Yes I did. I bought Counter-Strike and played it for a long time. Well, yeah those loot crates in that game were a huge part of it. However, important thing was that they never gave you any advantage above other players. Changes were only cosmetic.

2. Yes, I bought a few, I think I did purely for fun. I opened them with a friend later. We weren't very lucky and that discouraged me from buying more.

3. Well it might be. Personally I have never spent a lot of money on such thing but I know people who did. I think this is just another way of gambling. There are some people who get easily addicted to it and for them, such system of loot boxes can be dangerous.
I played Dota 2 for a short while, and RocketLeague is somewhere on my “to buy” list, but in neither case I did, or plan to, buy lootboxes. I remember getting a few (or rather keys to open them) back in the day when I obsessively played Team Fortress 2. Not that I ever expected any fantastic rewards for doing so, but I simply spent enough hours in the game to think that getting myself some limited cosmetic items would be a good indication of how involved I am. At the same time, the amount of time I spent in that game is ludicrous, so even from today’s point of view I don’t consider that money wasted – the developer more than deserved some extra cash for a title that had me entertained for so long. I don’t consider the whole idea of a lootbox inherently evil or dangerous, but I do agree that lately it has been abused, and has been misused by greedy developers to prey on people with weak wills (or rather their wallets). I wouldn’t ban them completely, but rather implement restrictions that would serve to lessen the grip of this system on the gamblers – perhaps limit amounts that can be bought daily, demand from game creators to disclose the chances of obtaining each item, and force adding systems to obtain the boxes from a regular play – faster than it happens in already established titles. One additional principle I’d like to see made into a law would be that the game can’t ever lock any important parts of gameplay behind a lootbox or similar system – so make them useful only for bragging rights and to boast your luck and involvement in the game, rather than gain an advantage over other players.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and natura...

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds...

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?