Skip to main content

Week 4 [06.11-12.11] – When the physical world ceases to exist

If you are reading this, you are probably in the first half of the XXI century. Arbitrary measure of time that our civilization is currently using assumes the probable date of Christ’s birth as the first day of our Era. The era that doesn’t have an end date. Or does it?

For the purpose of this text let’s assume that the big bang was the real start of the universe as we know it. What had been before? We will probably never know. We can suspect that the universe had never been created – it just had existed in some kind of a limbo until the bang happened. We suspect that it happened around 13,7 billion years ago. 

What fascinates human beings though, is not how things start but how they end. It doesn’t matter if a book or a movie was great if its ending was terrible, right? Unfortunately, in our case, it is even less satisfying than the last scene of the Monty Python and the Holy Grail. The most probable scenario is what we call a heat death.
(Heat death shirt: https://store.dftba.com/products/heat-death-shirt)

The heat death of the universe was first discussed in the second half of XIX century thanks to William Thomson’s work. He wrote two articles about the Dissipation of Mechanical Energy which led to forming a theory which forecasts an "end of all physical phenomena". But how could it happen?
(Source: http://www.eoht.info/page/Heat+death)

The universe is constantly expanding. For some time, we thought that the rate it happens is constant but in reality, it expands faster and faster. Because of that, every particle is slowly separated from its neighbors, slowly losing energy at the same time. If the expansion never stops it is bound to enter a state which dissolves all energy, making everything cold, quiet and motionless. At some point, in billions and billions of years everything needed to form new stars and plants will be exhausted and the universe will turn dark. Remaining suns will die, leaving the universe full of black holes, which slowly dissipate, ending the process. It is impossible to predict the time frame for the death of the universe but we’ve calculated that it takes around a googol years for the most everlasting objects in the universe - super massive black holes - to decay(a really long time comparing to the 13,7 billion).

To understand the topic better you can watch the following video:

But there is hope. The "heat death" situation could be avoided if there is a method or mechanism to regenerate hydrogen atoms from radiation, dark energy or other sources. It would allow future humans or some other intelligent species to generate energy forever, making them essentially gods. Other possibility is a big crunch that can lead to a new big bang and the cycle starting anew.

No one knows what will happen in the far future when we’re all either dead or living as immortal super humans but it is definitely interesting to imagine. Share your thoughts about the topic. What do you think is the future of our species and the universe? Do you believe that the world as we know will end some day? How? Do you think it is possible to overcome the death of the universe itself?

Sources:
The video listed above,
http://www.eoht.info/page/Heat+death,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe,
http://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae181.cfm

Comments

Unknown said…
I think that people will disappear before the end of the universe. Maybe we will find solution to this problem like in movie Interstellar. Now we don't now if we have been on the moon so we shouldn't go so far into space. I think that black holes are big problem. I have watched a lot of programs about black holes on the Discovery channel. Maybe this is the reason why I'm scared of them so much. Maybe we live in atrificial world like Matrix. Maybe this movie describes our future.
Unknown said…
We don't know anything, instead of making false assumptions about the death of the universe, finish exploring the earth, then move up to the galaxy. There is no evidence that dark energy even exists, scientists don't even know what theories to make up anymore.
First of all it's really important to state that there is nothing that we can be sure of, even the preceding words fall into this category. As with every scientific theory the ideas revolving around the expansion and inevitable cooling of the universe are just the best estimates of what we know. I believe that everything is possible, but some probabilities are so low that it is not worth to think about them. One of such examples would be an immortality of our species, which is likely less probable that me finding myself on Mars right now due to all particles in my body performing a perfect quantum jump.

I really like the idea of Great Filter, which bases itself on Fermi Paradox. It states that some steps of evolutionary path might be almost or not possible to achieve at all, because our galaxy should be full of life given all its parameters and yet we only know of one place where it is present. We destroyed our own planet, the only hospitable place we know. There is a law of nature, which states that every species that overshoot its caring capacities will be culled down to reasonable numbers. So maybe before thinking about fouling other solar systems we should stop and try to repair what we destroyed in our own home.
Jakub Lisicki said…
There is so much more about the universe that we don't know and there is a great chance that we'll never know. We can't be really sure about what will happen to the universe, since our knowledge is mostly based on wide range of theorems. These theorems pretty often contradict each other, which makes it even more difficult to distinguish when we're right and when we are wrong.
Human race can't even handle many things about this world and our own home planet. If it doesn't change, I'm pretty sure that we won't be witnesses to the end of the universe.
The world that we know would eventually have to change in order to addapt to the new events that may occur in the future, some of the changes may mean that some of the planets inhabited by humans will cease to exist, but I believe that we, as a race, are capable of surviving. Maybe by inhabiting different galaxies, or maybe different universes, I can't really tell now.
I don't know if it's possible to overcome death of the universe now, since we can't be sure that it's dying. This is one of the problems that will probably have to be discussed eventually, in the future.
Unknown said…
Interestingly, if the big crunch theory is true, then entropy would actually decrease with time, as things get closer together and become more ordered. This would then flip the Thermodynamic Arrow of Time, and so everything would actually start going, from our current perspective, backwards in time. However, we would then also start going backwards in time as well, so we would have no way of telling if we were going forwards or backwards and, as such, we can currently say that we are going both backwards and forwards through time if the big crunch is in fact what occurs.
Unknown said…
We definitely know that something we call dark energy exists. We just don't know what it really is. Thank you for the comment.
Unknown said…
What's so great about humanity is that we can break those laws of nature and still prosper. Thank you for the comment.
Unknown said…
People like to think about the end of human race but noone seems to believe that we'll overcome all difficulties we meet. We've been doing for ages now and I don't think we will ever stop. Thank you for the comment.
Unknown said…
Time travel is always confusing. The fourth dimention is something we will probably never fully understand. Thank you for the comment.
I’m almost certain that people will cease to exist billions years before the end of our universe. Our species will either extinct or evolve to some higher species, possibly able to overcome the death of our star, or even our universe. The world as we know will definitely end someday, just think about it, if someone from 1800 somehow time travel to year 2000, he would be probably shocked, and wouldn’t consider 2000’s world as the world he knew. The same with us, I think that in as little as 50 years, the life on earth will be unrecognizable from the world we live in now.
Unknown said…
Limiting ourselves to earth only is like swimming in a backyard pond when there is an ocean to explore. And which assumptions are blatantly false exactly?
Universe is expanding and will be as far as we know, eventually it will stretch to the point of heath death. What's wrong with exploring galaxy? We can learn about earth by knowing the far away space better.
Unknown said…
Truly fascinating questions and topic. How it all started and how will it end? Wish I knew.
I like the idea of big crunch, expanding and then contracting universe in cycles with big bang as fullcircle point. It makes sense for me. Everything in nature works in cycles so maybe whole universe is. Hopefully, because heath death is not most optimistic perspective even though we as a specie can be long gone before it happens. Or become gods, who knows? We shall not see.
Is that really a matter we can deal with? Certainly not as occupants of the universe in question. Assuming the human race would persist until the end of the universe, we might experience this loss of heat as things slowing down.

The thing is, just as a person caught in a computer simulation has to follow the timeline, so have we. The universe we live in might grow cold and come to stop someday, but as 4-dimentional we wouldn't be able to fight with it, as we wouldn't be able to notice it in the first place. At some point things would just stop.
Unknown said…
This post is also about death. It's so pessimistic.
I didn't even know if our world will stop existing. Maybe yes, but we or our children won't see and know it. If yes, it will happen in the future, after thousands of years. And I am inclined to think that yes, because our planet become worned down too, but very slow. So maybe when something bad happened to it, people would be at another planet.
Zygmunt Z said…
As Anastasiia said, your subjects might be very depressing to some people. Death, generally is natural and inevitable, even if we find a way to slow the process of ageing down. Same goes with this topic. As you wrote, we don't know what will happen in far future. We either die or somehow evolve but we personally won't see it. I am certain that we live in a world where we will experience at least one breakthrough but we won't see the end of our planet. Anastasiia pointed correctly that our planet becomes worned but very slow and if we think that we will keep developing technologically, maybe people will inhabitate different planet.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?