Skip to main content

Week 9 [28.05-03.06.2018] Hey human, how can I help you ? - Virtual voice assistants

A.I. and machine learning era is constantly making our life easier and more comfortable.
Undoubtedly, areas which have been developing rapidly in last few years are Natural Language Processing (NLP) and
Natural Language Understanding (NLU) which have enabled development of advanced voice assistant devices.
However, speech recognition concept is not a recent development - first devices which were capable of recognizing
human voice had been presented in 50’s of 20th century by Bell Labs and later by IBM.
One of the breakthrough events in A.I. and voice recognition areas took place in February 2011,
IBM Watson - a supercomputer capable of understanding and answering natural language questions - took part in
popular quiz show “Jeopardy!” [1]. During two-game match it was competing with two best human contestants.
IBM Watson defeated them and finally won the main prize - 1 million dollars, which was later given to charities by IBM
That was the turning point in competition between the biggest tech companies in designing the best voice assistant system
Here is a brief summary of most popular ones

Apple Siri

In October 2011 Apple introduced Siri - a virtual assistant as a part of Apple’s xOS operating systems. Users can interact
with Siri using voice commands and perform different tasks like: finding information on the web by asking questions, calling & texting,
navigating, scheduling events in a calendar, playing music, changing device settings etc. In 2016 Apple decided to publish Siri API for
third-party developers allowing for Siri integration with a variety of mobile apps.
Recently, Apple has released HomePod which is a smart speaker powered by Siri.


Apple HomePod [5]

Amazon Alexa


A virtual assistant system introduced by Amazon in 2014 and initially deployed on Amazon Echo
and Amazon Echo Dot smart speakers. By default they are in the listening mode, waiting for the
keyword “Alexa” to be spoken, after which a user can ask a device to do something for him.
Similarly to other smart speakers it supports dozens of services and apps for playing music, checking
weather and calendar, navigating etc. Alexa can even order items from Amazon Prime online shop.
Alexa’s major advantage, compared to its competitors, is the “skills” mechanism. This feature enables
users and developers to create small, customized apps for interacting with Alexa-enabled devices,
which external service providers, like e.g: Uber, Lyft or Domino’s Pizza, can use to integrate their
products and services with Alexa. We can also use Alexa for Smart Home solutions to control and
monitor devices at home using voice (e.g. control your lights via Alexa and Philips Hue) There
is a good tutorial on official web pages about creating your own skill for Alexa:

One thing which Amazon engineers really need to improve is handling big numbers :)




Amazon Echo [6]

Google Assistant

Google introduced Assistant in May 2016 as the extension of Google Now search service. It is available on many
different platforms including Android devices, iOS devices and Google Home -a  smart speaker by Google.
Google Assistant has similar capabilities as its main competitors: scheduling meetings in a calendar,
playing music or controlling smart home devices. On last Google I/O conference Google introduced new extension
to Google Assistant called Duplex which is capable of making phone calls
and holding natural conversation with humans.


They presented recorded phone calls with a hair salon and restaurant to show how Duplex can actually make a
haircut appointment or reserve a table in a restaurant on your behalf. Google claims that those phone calls had
not been staged beforehand.



Google Home [7]


It is obvious that voice is becoming another interface in human-computer interaction and voice assistants supported by hyped
machine learning will be rapidly gaining popularity in next few years. According to Juniper Research [2] at least one smart
speaker will be installed in 55% of households in USA by the year 2022. Currently, we are hearing a lot of announcements
concerning possible applications of voice assistants. Here are two of them:

Healthcare

There are a number of use cases in healthcare industry where voice assistants can be successfully utilised.
There are already complete programmes for patients with a specific disease (e.g: diabetes) based on daily
interviews with patients, performed by s voice assistant.
Those interviews could cover questions about a patient’s condition, medications adherence, whether a  
patient feels pain or not, etc. Voice assistants can also remind patients to take medications, take blood
pressure measurements or to check blood sugar level. Answers to those questions are regularly sent
to a physician in order to constantly monitor patient’s health.
Another related area where voice assistants can help  is elderly care, one of the examples is
ElliQ [4] - a voice-activated assistant for elderly people. ElliQ not only reminds to take medications or monitors health  
but also helps elderly people to stay in touch with their family by setting up video chats and makes them feel less isolated.

Office

Voice assistants can also increase productivity in offices by automating many activities which are encountered on a daily basis.
One of the examples is “Alexa for business”, which can start meetings and control video conferences. Voice assistants can make
office workers’ lives easier by helping them in a more trivial way e.g.: by quickly finding information or an address, making to-do lists,
making calculations or scheduling meetings in a calendar.

Questions:

  1. Do you use any voice assistant on a daily basis ? If so, which one ? If no, do you consider using one ?
  2. What are the other areas where voice assistants would bring value to their potential users ?
  3. What are the possible disadvantages of dissemination of voice assistants ?

Links:
[7] https://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16881716002

Comments

Lukasz Mroczek said…
I don't use any voice assistant on a daily basis. Mainly because I think that they are not accurate and also it takes more time to use them than simply type on keyboard. That's also why I don't consider using it.
The other area where voice assist is really worth it is car industry. Some time ago, Mercedes released their new A class with voice assistant at the level that I'd like to use but to be honest it's too expensive to buy this car to have high quality voice assistant.
I don't see may disadvantages except the fact that people who don't like to talk to other will start to talk with machines. It's dangerous.
Unknown said…
I have never used this system because I have never had the opportunity. I don't use Apple devices, so I've never used Siri. In google I usually prefer to write than to say. I think I just prefer to be simple.
As with any American film, it would be nice to have a voice system at home that would help you turn on the light or expose the louvre.
I think the biggest disadvantage of this system is that sometimes the machine does not understand what we are saying about it.
Unknown said…
I've recently tried Amazon's Alexa but I did not find anything in it that would make me an everyday user of voice assistants. I guess there are not so many features that are really that useful, most of them are simple functions such as voice search which is not used that often or voice media playback control which is more practical but still is not used very often. But I believe that recent debut of Google's Duplex will change this field of AI research and development and we might be seeing AI assistants doing some more complex and time-consuming tasks that require interaction with humans. Imagine complex AI like Duplex planning your vacations by looking for the perfect hotel in your price range, calling it and booking room. But I think the biggest opportunities to AIs like Duplex lie in the business sector. Maybe soon AI will be the one who will negotiate different business deals.
There are few problems. I guess today many people afraid if this technology because it can be used in different fraudulent scenarios, for example, what if some hacked/rogue voice assistant will call your bank by impersonating you and try to withdraw all money from your bank account. Such bots can cause big problems in the future and currently, there are no official regulations that can prevent abusive usage of AI technology.
Unknown said…
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. You've mentioned a valid point - security which is of great importance when we talk about technology nowadays. I think that the biggest players like Amazon or Google should and actually work on solutions providing security to their voice-enabled products.
Unknown said…
Thanks for your comment. I agree that currently it is e.g.: faster to type text message than using voice for doing it, but there are some scenarios where I find voice commands more convenient e.g. adding destination on Google Maps while driving.
Unknown said…
Thank you for commenting. I also think that we'll see a rapid growth in applying voice-enabled devices in automotive industry as it can really improve road traffic safety by e.g.: reducing number of accidents caused by drivers distracted by typing on their smartphones.
I consider voice assistants to be rather feature than daily need. I have used Siri,
Bixby and Google Assistant for quite some time. Generally everyone of them works good
enough but as was mentioned above their accuracy is still not enough to replace standard keyboard.

To my mind car industry should be the target of the voice assistants. It would be really helpful to have Siri or Google Assistant in your car. You don't have to interrupt to do something instead those assistants will do everything for you. I think this could significantly decrease the number of accidents.

To my opinion the biggest disadvantage of this system may be misunderstanding. It's not an easy task to recognize what person says and moreover what he/she meant.
Unknown said…
Thanks for your comment. I think that voice assistants accuracy is still an important issue however, it is constantly improving and currently is quite decent.
What is more, e.g.: Amazon Alexa offers Voice Training feature by which you can teach Alexa your voice using 25 training phrases which in turn allow her to better understand your commands.
Unknown said…
I don't use the voice assistant on a daily basis, but I have apple watch and Siri turns on every day. I don't even say the key word "hello siri" it annoys me a little. Because I'm doing something and suddenly I hear someone talking to me from my wrist. In my opinion this type of system is still weak. But I heard that artificial Oled technology on Tv works very well. My colleague works in Samsung and says that the voice control works perfectly. I have to check it out
Unknown said…
I don't use any voice assistant and I don't think I need one right now. I think that such technology could be helpful for people with disabilities and recovering from injury.
Unknown said…
Using google assistant to call someone just because its faster that way. On the other hand knowing that somebody listens to all you are saying might be disturbing for most of the people and here the most disturbing question of privacy comes in. Even if company actually good and don't listening there are other threats like hackers and tech glitches.
Unknown said…
Thank you for commenting. You are right about the privacy issues of voice-enabled devices as we cannot be sure about know how our voice interactions are really collected, stored and used.
Unknown said…
1. Do you use any voice assistant on a daily basis? If so, which one ? If no, do you consider using one?
On a daily basis is a bad description of my voice assistance usage, as I don't use it that much. I've tried multiple of them (siri, google assistant, alexa) and I will definitely stick to google assistant.

2. What are the other areas where voice assistants would bring value to their potential users?
We could use it more often in work to speed some business processes up or to make notes during the conference meetings. We could use it for the same reason in court or in hospitals to create filled with crucial data reports. We could also use it in schools to learn real stuff and all boilerplate operations or information could be calculated or found by AI.

3. What are the possible disadvantages of dissemination of voice assistants?
I think we would get addicted to the voice assistants, which makes our data and private information vulnerable to the companies running these AI systems. Moreover, If we got addicted, we are much easier to control.
Filip Sawicki said…
I don’t use any voice assistant on a daily basis. Technology is not that mature yet to allow for convenient usage. However we are not far behind, I think that in the near future we will have very competent voice assistant systems. I think that this technology will hugely benefit healthcare industry it will support doctors with medical expertise and in-depth data analysis.
Vladlen Kyselov said…
I don`t use voice assistants, but I would like to use those for example for some kind of reminders. This technology has lots of great ways to be used for. I think that in the nearest future should be made something that transforms human brain signals into voice, it will help disabled people very very much, also it would be usefull in courts, police so that criminal won`t be able to lie.
Marcin Mróz said…
No, I don't use any kind of voice assistants on daily basis as I rather prefer to lookup any information that I need by myself. It's probably just because when I have a phone in my hand it's just faster to type anyhting I want on the keyboard. Dedicated speakers are game changers and maybe they could be really useful. I'd have to see one of them in action to decide whether I'd want one or not. I think that voice assistants could be very useful in any kind of jobs that hands are in constant use and you don't have constant access to the computer such as hairdressers, mechanics, dentists. They could check up anything without stopping their work. I don't see any disadvantages in such devices, I believe they could be really useful, but I don't know if the technology is so advanced that everyone would like to buy one now.
Unknown said…
Thanks for your comment. In my opinion this technology is actually mature enough allowing voice assistants to be responsible for simple tasks in various scenarios both private and professional. Additionally, occupations you've mentioned seem to be perfect adopters of voice assistant solutions.
Marcin Górski said…
I don't use any voice assistant on a daily basis because it's unfinished technology for me. I have tried Siri and I had problems with my voice recognition. Simple commands like "call Martin" or "play music" is okay but what if I want to do something tougher? It can be very helpful but we should give more time (Siri in my case) to develop it.
I think that voice assistant can help us with in driving, people should be focused on the road. We can replace buttons with voice command and it can decrease dangerous situations while driving. I think that disadvantages are only when technology is undeveloped. The biggest problem is bad word recognition because if system do it badly you have to make it on your own and voice assistant is unnecessary.
Anna Koca said…
Do you use any voice assistant on a daily basis ? If so, which one ? If no, do you consider using one ?
Actually I had my short adventure with Siri and I remember it to be fast and user friendly. I asked myself - why don't I use it then on a daily basis? I guess the main problem is our habits - we are used to type search queries in our browsers, instead of activating the search vocally with Siri. I guess one day, voice assistants will be the only option (touch interface will be obsolete) and we will see the true rise of voice assistants.

What are the other areas where voice assistants would bring value to their potential users ?
I think it is great for blind people. It helps them to cope with daily errands and let them use digital devices, not only telephone, but through IoT also smart houses and even order things from shops.


What are the possible disadvantages of dissemination of voice assistants ?
Everything that's happening due to dissemination of Internet and technology in general - lack of privacy, collection of personal data, the feeling of being overwhelmed and monitored and losing the ability to cope on your own without help of the technology, I guess.
Unknown said…
Im not using voice assistance and I'm not considering using one, simply because I cant imagine why would I need it.
2. I think in everyday life in house, if that voice assistant would be good enough.
3. I honestly have no idea. Sometimes i notice that they can recognize my speech clearly, but i guess it's because of my bad pronunciation)
Andrzej Gulak said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
Do you use any voice assistant on a daily basis ? If so, which one ? If no, do you consider using one ?
Currently I don’t use any voice assistant, because one simple reason which is, any of the accessible on market no offer polish language. The idea of voice communication is in my opinion great but not yet for polish people. I consider to using one whenever will be available in polish. I have heard that Google currently working on polish NLP, and I can’t wait for that.
What are the other areas where voice assistants would bring value to their potential users ?
For me that will be cars, when the steering of car equipment will be not so distracting for drivers.
My second thought is that voice - computer communication will be good idea for call office which could reduce costs of employee.
What are the possible disadvantages of dissemination of voice assistants ?
It is already happened that one of the voice assistant send some conversation of its users to random contact, which was in my opinion a bug, but still they are listening us continuously and that could be not safe for people. It is huge privacy volition.
Unknown said…
Thank you for commenting. Undoubtedly, drivers seem to be one of the biggest group which are taking advantage of voice-enabled solutions. I would argue that voice assistants offer poor speech recognition, in my opinion it is quite decent and is constantly improving and some solutions (above-mentioned Alexa) offer voice training in order to better understand voice commands.
Unknown said…
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and experiences with Siri. Your remark about people's habits is significant when we talk about widespread adoption of voice assistants as many people will find it hard to start talking to their smartphone instead of typing as they are used to do. Voice-enabled devices are of course great candidates for personal assistants for disabled people helping them with activities of a daily living and blind people seem to be the group which could benefit most from this technology.
Yes, sometimes I use voice assistant especially when I need to find my phone. I just say loudly "Ok Google, Play music" and I'm able to find it while it play something from my playlist. Also I have found very useful function that allow to set timer by voice (it very useful when you cook and have dirty hands and don't want to take your phone). But I believe that in future assistants will do more from telling stories to psychotherapy because AI will be able to analyze behavior of human more better that real psychotherapist and this is our future. Also on last week Yandex has presented their smart speaker and it has impressive voice recognition possibilities (he hear better than human).
I do't use any kind of assistant, as i am too lazy to explore it's capabilities and i am not planning on using one. It sounds fun for some time but i think there is nothing more depressing than a guy speking to a device. The most obvious use of such devices is some star trek styled space ship controlls =) As for modern era it could be used almost everuwhere, where information is being processed. Disadvantage could be even further lazyfication of average human being, with technological advance we tend to ease on physical and social interactions, and if everything could be done through an assistant these processes will become more dangerous.
No, I am not using any voice assistance as I find it useless. I have my own smartphone and hands so things like weather I can check myself. We know this scenario from movies when main hero tells "computer" to do something. I think nowadays it would be hard for people to get used to it as we do everything ourselves. Probably voice assistance could be installed in vehicles to read/write messages or to set navigation. I think that not everyone speak clearly, so sometimes it could be missunderstood by voice assistance especially we have mostly english voice assistance and polish people don't have good accent.
Unknown said…
Yep, I'm using siri on a daily basis - setting alarm, checking weather and the most important for me "voice calling". These is a game changer, I can do my stuff f.e. chores or driving car and just say "hey siri, call my dad on speaker". I love it. It would be great to have voice controll in your home or car, to set temprature, lights ect. Accualy, the newest Audi has that option. As far as disadvantages are concerned, I don't see any, it's just helpfull ;)
Unknown said…
I don't use any voice assistants on a daily basis. Sometimes I happen to use siri, but rarely.

I think there are a lot of areas where voice assistants will bring value. It is hard for me to say something more about this because I don't know about this technology and I think that it is already used in many places.

In my opinion there are no disadvantages. Certainly they will find some, but none of them come to mind.
Cecylia said…
Generaly i think it is too much , Its easier to type and talking to a thing is weird
Unknown said…
My only voice assistant is Siri, but I use it so rare and just for fun. We once made two Siri chat with each other, so you could imagine how "important" it is for me. But that works quite well, I just have a habit to type, because it seems to me that my hands control the device better than my voice. If something goes wrong I don't have to wait the Siri finishes it's speech, I just retype and get the result. Well, for sure voice assistants could be very useful for busy people, blind people, drivers or just for someone who prefers that type of assistant. So I don't see the disadvantages, only the advantages.
Unknown said…
I don't. I use Siri to set up timer while cooking, seldom I ask her about the weather and that's all. I believe they are the future. However, I will take time to make them more popular and capable of doing things as an assistant should do, like making appointments in restaurants.

They have tremendous potential. As far as I am concerned, we can make them capable of solving tasks that personal virtual assistant can do.

It's quite scary that they might pretend to be real humans on the phone. That's what bothers me the most.
Cecylia said…
I don't use any voice assistant on a daily basis but my boyfriend use siri and google to search some things but he do this just because he is lazy and don't want to type the phrase. I would not use this because its a sign of laziness and kind of stupid. This kind of option is perfect for people who are disable and cannot type like others. then we can consider this a good thing. But speaking to a box is funny . i understand that the technology goes fast but come on, it makes us too comfortable . whats next, are we going to teach children speak to a machine and not to write ?

Popular posts from this blog

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and naturally.

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?