Skip to main content

Week 8 [21.05-27.05.2018] Simple way to improve your neighborhood

Simple way to improve your neighborhood
We are living in the XXI century, and we can access any information on the Internet whenever we
desire it, we could buy nearly anything there and work remotely, all inside our homes. But we still
need wander around our neighborhoods and cities. And there are still plenty places we could
improve. And Jeff Speck has an idea, how we should do it.

Link to the video on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wai4ub90stQ
1.    Do you agree with the Jeff’s arguments? Why or why not?
2.    Do you have any place in your neighborhood, that could be improved?
3.    How would you improve any important place in your area or city?

Comments

Unknown said…
Yes, I agree with his statements. In fact, I found data presented in the video very interesting and intriguing. Not so many people actually realize that changing transportation system is one of the major factors that can improve living conditions in big cities.
Yes, there are lots of places that can be improved in my neighborhood.
Considering that I have enough financial supplies I would start from making my area/city more "green" and more eco-friendly, maybe first step would be investing more in solar panels that can be installed on roofs of office buildings, schools, and medical establishments.
Unknown said…
1. Europe has changed their car focused urban planning already some time ago and it’s pursuing the development of more pedestrian friendly infrastructure consequently. Although one motivation not mentioned is observation that cars cause unsolvable problem with traffic that no expensive infrastructure can handle, and thus shift to public transportation. All this proves so far that it is correct path and I have absolutely no reason to object.
2. There’s a program in Warsaw called participatory budgeting that attempts to improve a city on the locale scale by inviting population to suggest ideas and vote for them to be implemented. I’ve never been able to come up with something.
3. As I said before I don’t really know. I don’t spend much time on thinking how to improve the city. I’d prefer if someone took care of it for me.
Unknown said…

This guy is great. I totally agree with this point of view. Look at how his thinking is different than our everyday decision making. When you focus on a goal which should be good for the community, not for the one person, it changes the way you look at problems and then solve them. I understand not everyone might be so enthusiastic about those ideas, but they are clearly working, thought through and also decently backed up by facts.
I can't find any ideas now but I have another way to think about it now, when I observe the city.
Jakub Nietupski said…
His arguments make a lot of sense. Most of us don't have time to participate in a sport or to attend gym so the only opportunity to move a little bit would be during the commute.
A lot of places in my neighborhood could be improved because most of the roads and pathways are very old or have poor quality and need fixing.
I would invest in a 3rd subway line and forbid cars from entering the city center - it would limit air pollution and traffic jams.
Iman Masjedi said…
I agree with Jeff's opinion.In my opinion, there should be a lot of changes in urban design structures.
Changes to the faster access to more traffic areas.
Unknown said…
So my question is - do your neighborhood have communication issues? Are there any traffics in the mornings or evenings, when people are going to work or going back to homes? It's not only the "green neighborhood", that makes the city more walkable and less crowded in several small areas, but the sum of the problems, that it has.
Unknown said…
I'd like to be able to take part in that budget, but for now I'm not allowed to it. But soon it will change and I will come up with something to change in my neighborhood - most probably with the bicycle paths, that are still in poor conditions in some places and there are as well places, where roads were build in a very strange and illogical manner.
Unknown said…
Glad you now have this way of thinking about your closest area. Fortunately it is changing in Poland, where there are still many problems with public space management. Outside the big cities many streets and parks are build in the confusing or not comfortable for the pedestrians or bicycles.
Unknown said…
I know, that there would be a huge resistance against the car ban in city center, but it would help a lot if only there would be a good communication lines around it for cars and inside with the public transportation.
As for the third subway line: there is no doubt, it should be build as fast as possible, but - in my opinion - it should be same as the circle line in Moscow or St. Petersburg. In Warsaw it could connect both main train stations (East and West), the Dworzec Gdański on the north and the Wilanowska metro station on the south.
Anna Koca said…
1. Do you agree with the Jeff’s arguments? Why or why not?
I agree that congestion is one of the biggest problems nowadays in the cities. As someone correctly observed before, a lot of cities, such as London or Bergen in Norway have already introduced solutions for car regulations in their city centres. It is very important to be able to live in a city where you feel space and freedom and not fumes and car horns all the time.

2. Do you have any place in your neighborhood, that could be improved?
Yes, recently I have observed that trees are being cut down in front of my windows instead of planting new ones. Those trees are absolutely necessary especially in areas where distribution of building is tight and neighbors can see from their windows what is happening in your appartment. Trees make for a block in such situations.

3. How would you improve any important place in your area or city?
In Warsaw I think we should move toward the Rings (just like in Berlin or London) that would reduce the congestion and make moving from one part of the city to another much faster.
Unknown said…
Yes, I agree with Jeff's arguments. It's hard to think but improving transport in big cities has a great impact on life in cities. It's hard to choose.

Certainly there will be many such places. There are definitely not enough trees in the area. It could use a fountain, maybe more parking spaces.

Hard to say. Maybe more seats in the park. Renewing some places
I agree with Jeff's arguments and especially i want to mention public goals or all the goals we need to make public. Everyone has a place of neighborhood that must be improved. I want to say even more, that we(humanity) need to make an effort to improve it. I would do everything for people in my city. I would add all the needed things in the parks, pedestrian areas and etc.
Unknown said…
Do you agree with the Jeff’s arguments? Why or why not?
Yes, I never take his point of view but it is good. The nearest area can shape our life.
Do you have any place in your neighborhood, that could be improved?
I think there are many of that places but also I can find many places that are good like parks.
While car as a work necessity has become a truth its also a convince still. We have to remember that even if the public transport becomes very cheap or free things wont change. Warsaw is a great example of why u would not want to rely on public transportation even if it was free. I would not want to rely only on public transportation because even as a paid service is unreliable in terms of getting to work, so many buses and trains are late or dont arrive at all and you can do nothing about it! What if you had an important meeting ? Well u either waste time by arriving very early or u re late. With a car u can tighten your schedule more and save more time even if the actual commuting part takes longer.
Hmm in neighborhood not really but i know a dozen places where more deterministic means of committing would be nice so called "Falenica" is one of them even though we have 2 buses and "regular" train there they are heavily unreliable.
In Warsaw i would focus on subway expansion as costly as it is a proper subway system in Warsaw could solve many problems in capital of Poland.
Illia Lukisha said…
1. Do you agree with the Jeff’s arguments? Why or why not?
Yes, I agree, and I think in cities people must develope public transportation more. Because it really saves time, our environment, and our health..

2. Do you have any place in your neighborhood, that could be improved?
I think we can start from improving our housing, by using "energy effective" tech, cars, etc.

3. How would you improve any important place in your area or city?
I live in flat, but if I would live in house, I could use solar panels, for providing electricity for myself, and selling it to electric network.
Unknown said…
Yes, I agree. I was not thinking about it before but even now living in Warsaw I will prefer to get to the office by Metro, but it not near my house, not too many places can be reached by it in Warsaw.
No, I’m leaving in very green and quiet neighborhood for sure it could be better with some solar panels but it not in my power to change it. Also, my neighborhood has some transport problems to get out of their by car, but in my opinion, it for best as it motivates to use trams.
Unknown said…
Shame, that nobody thought about planting new trees in your area, but I hope it will change soon. Trees are not good oxygen producers all the time (remember, that most of the plants use oxygen when there is no sunlight), but they are great for cleaning the air from pollution and they are making neighborhood look much more pleasant for everybody.
Unknown said…
Do you have something or someplace specific in mind? Many people don't know they need something that's bothering them until someone will point it for them.
Unknown said…
Well, most of the people would be glad to have reliable public transport such as the subway system, but it's extremely hard to go with this kind of decision for government. It's much more expensive than creating tram or bus lines around and it takes longer to build stations for subway than bus/tram stops. But I know the people would love to have much more than two lines of subway in Warsaw.
Actually my neigborhood is pretty well designed of course there are some things that could be improved like more parking slots for residents. But generally we have a very well designed park with some caffes, playground for youngsters and good facilities for local residents.
I would improve the city center, the place around palace of Culture. It could be amazing place to hang out but now, its gray and ugly. I know there are plans to create "Central park" exactly there but I am not sure when or if would it even happend. Hopefully "Rotunda" is being renovated right now, which is nice as it is well known spot in the center and everyone knows where it is.
Unknown said…
Many buildings could use the solar panels at their roofs, not event the private houses outside the city center. Even parts of their sunny-sided walls could be used for them. This would make them more self-efficient and could give their walls the second life. Just look what did the Tesla for the roof tiles - some of them don't look like the panels but the normal tiles.
Unknown said…
For me trams are much more reliable than buses in case of the traffic jams during the rush hours, but there is risk, when one of them will break the whole rail line is blocked for some time. Fortunately for me I didn't have any kind of that problem before when going by trams anywhere and I want it to stay it this way.
Unknown said…
Shame, that nobody tries creating the underground parkings in city center, that would give more greenish places on the ground in Warsaw. And Palace of Culture is typical soviet building - looks heavily, got ugly gray color and it's neighborhood is very shallow.
Unknown said…

I agree with Jeff, because in my opinion city planning has the biggest impact on everyday life of everyone, city that is planned good has less polluted air, less traffic, less cars and less health problems, so, quality of life is much better.
Biggest problem in my neighborhood is traffic and lots of cars. I think it can be improved with a group of good profesional city planners and grant from local government or city hall.
As i said, it would be great if city planners started working on reducing traffic, that will let the city "breath". It can be done by checking cars, upgrading municipal transport and creating more parking spots.
Oh my, i'm the greatest example of preson presented in this video. I live in suburbs and sure, i got public transport but still it takes much more time to get anywhere so i couldnt live without my car. Im using it every day. Mostly to get to work but, also i have to get to my girlfriend which lives on the oposite side of warsaw. It's alsmost 40km in streight line.
But if i comes to main subject im not so sure about what is said there. In fact suburbs are great way of escaping concrete jungle. Living almost in forest motivate me to move and run or ride a bike. Driving to my work isnt really hard as im not crossing any major routes and when i drive to my gf im just going to bypass and it takes about 35 minutes. In my opinion warsaw is really great city when it comes to its desing. We just lack some minor improvements and repairs of roads.
Cecylia said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Cecylia said…
I agree with Jeff Speck’s arguments – I also believe that nowadays cities should focus more on attracting people rather than corporations. If a city has well designed public transportation system it will not only be better for the environment but also much more effective and will generate more profit. There are many places that could be improved around me, but currently I doubt if it’s possible – many of the building in my neighborhood are simply not being cared about and so they deteriorate more and more over the years. In Warsaw It would be great to add more green spaces, plant more trees and flowers everywhere – it would brighten up the city and probably create a lighter mood everywhere.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and natura...

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds...

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?