Skip to main content

Week 6 [19-25.11.18] What's a computer?

In February 2010, Steve Jobs introduced the iPad. He defined it as a product fitting a category between a phone and a traditional computer. It’s been steadily becoming more popular and powerful ever since, driving the competition forward on the market.

However, iPad hasn’t really been a serious threat to traditional personal computers. Its processor was significantly less powerful than Intel silicon used on Macs. Its camera technology used to be a year behind what was in smartphones. That all changed in 2015 when Apple introduced the iPad Pro.

The iPad Pro started to shrink the differences between a tablet and a traditional computer in terms of hardware. The first generation introduced A9X, an Apple-designed ARM processor that had nearly double the performance of its predecessor. The iPad Pro also was the first device to support Apple Pencil, a stylus that people thought Apple would never want to introduce.

The fact that iPad Pro was catching up with Macs in terms of performance and that Apple could do nothing about it raised a question among the customers, reviewers and engineers: can it replace a traditional computer? Not a lot of time has passed before Apple used that to challenge the definition of a computer.

They published a TV ad, depicting a girl asking „what’s a computer” as if she’s not familiar with the concept of a desktop or laptop machine. The ad’s reception was catastrophic — it quickly became a trending topic on Twitter. People just ranted everything about it, and especially that controversial question. It was so bad that Business Insider wrote a whole article about it.

Fast forward 10 months to October 30, 2018. Just a few weeks ago Apple introduced the 3rd generation of iPad Pro, a first complete redesign of iPad since 2013. It’s powered by the A12X chip which has so much in it, it’s hard to begin: 8-core CPU, 7-core GPU and 8-core Neural Engine that has the power to perform up to 5 trillion (that’s 12 zeroes) operations per second. This device is more powerful than 92% of all portable computers sold in 2018.

Such power didn’t go unnoticed as Apple invited Adobe to present a demo of a full-featured Photoshop running on iPad and specifically designed for it. It didn’t stop there — they also previewed a full-featured Autocad editor coming to iPad in 2019 as well.

However, many users and reviewers tend to agree that all this innovation in hardware is being held back by the limitation in software. Professionals just can’t do their jobs on an iPad because it doesn’t support their workflows. The whole situation could be summed up by a quote that I overheard in one of the podcasts I listen to: „I wish I was into iPad because this device is amazing. But I’m not.”

Earlier on Monday, I stumbled across a video that summarizes the situation very well, in my opinion. If you want to, just watch the following video at 1.25x speed.

Question 1. Do you own an iPad or any other tablet (not a convertible computer, so Microsoft Surface doesn’t count)? How often and for what tasks do you use it?

Question 2. Do you think tablets will eventually replace traditional computers, such as laptops and desktop Macs and PCs? What will be the breaking point?

Question 3. Having seen the amazing progress in Apple-manufactured silicon, do you think it’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips in Macs and ditch Intel once and for all? Why?

Sources: iMore: iPad Pro 2017 Review, Apple: What's a Computer?, Business Insider: Apple is running an ad where a kid asks, "What's a computer?" and people find it infuriating, Apple: Apple Special Event 2007, Apple: Apple Special Event 2018, ATP: Protective Sandwich, iMore: iPad Pro 2018 Review.

Comments

Unknown said…
1. Nope. I do not, but I'm thinking about getting one.
I will use it mainly to watch something/surf the internet. I bought 15" laptop and it's not comfortable enough for me to watch something while laying in bed.

2. You know, why not. Nowadays, tablets are very powerful devices. I think that introducing macOS to iPads will be the breakpoint, cause it'll bring much more functionalities.

3. Of course it'll be a great opportunity for Apple to use their own chipsets. They'll become more independent.
Question 1. Do you own an iPad or any other tablet (not a convertible computer, so Microsoft Surface doesn’t count)? How often and for what tasks do you use it?
I don't own such device - I thought about it, but I couldn't explain such expense to myself, if I alredy own a smartphone and laptop.

Question 2. Do you think tablets will eventually replace traditional computers, such as laptops and desktop Macs and PCs? What will be the breaking point?
I don't think so - I think that laptops will become smaller and lighter rather.

Question 3. Having seen the amazing progress in Apple-manufactured silicon, do you think it’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips in Macs and ditch Intel once and for all? Why?

It might be a good decision for them - especially their new devices might work better, if they would be designed for their own chipsets
Each form factor of electronic devices has its own niche in everyday usage for different purposes. Lets list one of advantages of each to make a better look:
PC -- high modification capabilities, flexibility
Laptop -- high mobility with presence of the same input features from pc (keyboard, mouse, etc.)
Tablet -- even higher mobility, less flexible, no modification possible, no easy access to keyboard and mouse
Mobile phone -- very high mobility, versatile utility, the least amount of input features and processing capacity.

In my opinion, each device has its own fields of usage. Some may become obsolete, but will it happen with a laptop anytime soon? No.
Why do you think introducing macOS to iPad would be a breaking point? Don't you think the main idea behind iPad (and tablets in general) is that they're specifically not traditional computers?
You mentioned that in your opinion laptops will become smaller and lighter. Do you think they will become smaller and lighter than tablets?

I think the market of laptops and tablets will remain diverse in terms of size and weight — some professionals, like video editors, that take advantage of large screen "real estate".
Well, your argument with lesser support for hardware input and lower processing capacity is not so valid. iOS has supported Bluetooth keyboard for iPhones and iPads for years now. The Apple Pencil is a supposed alternative to the mouse.

When it comes to performance — well, the data says otherwise. The A12X used in iPad Pro is rivalling Intel Core i7. A12 used in iPhone XS is as performant as Intel Core i5. I wouldn't call that "the least processing capacity" — as stated in the article, the iPad Pro is faster than 92 computers (that includes laptops) sold in 2018.
Unknown said…
Tablets can be very useful and helpful but it works simlilarly like phone only bigger. I saw many a time how people talk on the tablet – it looks ridiculously. Imagine that situation someone walk through city and keep something black close ear what’s bigger then head. Beautiful view for make good day. Personally I dont have tablet and i won’t buy it. For me phone and PC are sufficient in my live. If i have to check somethning quickly I just use my phone otherwise for read some news I turn on PC. I guys most people say that tablets will replace traditional computers but I know it never happend. Tables always be worst than PC. Traditional computers have to many opportunity and capabilities to develop. Nowadays thier flexibility and technology are high level. In order to tables can compare to PC and laptops. For me it’s gadget. Apple is the one of the largest in the world and They will try absorb market which leads to monopolization like Google or Amazon. It’s interesting idea but we have to see how it will work in practice. Perhaps it may be next toy/gadget for waste money.
Well, iPad has been on the market for more than 8 years now and it has been steadily sold at approx. 10 million units per quarter since 2015. Same goes for all Android-based tablets, at approx. 25 millions units per quarter. The market clearly doesn't see this as a gadget, otherwise the numbers wouldn't be this steady. You mentioned that Apple will absorb the market. Which market do you mean? What monopoly do you have in mind?
Bartosz Barnat said…
I don't have a tablet but I think if I had one I would use it for taking notes.

I don't think that they will replace computeres because PC's are like associated to your own place where you can work, watch films, relax and so on. Tablets are something small and it's portable so its just another think that you can carry anywhere you go. I like to have this one place in my home that I can custom every square of it. and I love that Pc's are huge for example with water cooling and few graphic's cards.

I think they will try to get rid of intel some day but it will take them a while. I think it will be a long process and we still don't know what intel will invent soon. As we all know technology is still changing and everyone is creating something new and innovative. So all I can say is they want to have everything as their product. They don't want to be dependent on something.
You're not the only one — I know a couple of people who considered buying an iPad Pro for taking notes (and generally for studying) as well.

As for the Intel transition — I agree that we don't know what Intel has to offer in the coming years but I bet Intel shares its roadmap with Apple. And Apple has been subtly emphasizing that their own chips are superior. I also agree that Apple tries to have control over every single aspect of their products and that one of the biggest arguments for transitioning to their own silicon.

Do you own a PC with a colorful water cooling system? :)
Artem Lipovatyi said…
1. No, I do not have a tablet. They never attracted me, probably because there was no need for it. 4 years ago I had experience with the Samsung Galaxy Tab, but after a couple of weeks, I realized that it was idle for a longer time.

2. Yes, it is quite possible, but I do not believe that in the near future. Of course, tablets are becoming more powerful every year, but for me, the laptop is still preferable. Also, tablets are limited by the system, which is not the case with computers whose systems are very flexible. I think it is a full-fledged operating system that will become a turning point.

3. Undoubtedly this should happen because Apple likes to produce its own products. But I will not hurry with the purchase, but wait a year or two to see how the new processors behave.
Yes, I own cheap GoClever tablet. It is a bit old and a far less powerful than any iPad, however I like it. I use it mostly when I am travelling and I don’t want or can’t bring laptop with me. Because of its poor performance it can’t fully replace normal computer but still I can do a lot of things with it. It has bigger screen than my phone, so when I want to watch some movies it is perfect. What is more I can even play some old computer games on it, like Heroes III.
I don’t think that tablets will eventually replace traditional computers. First of all, in my opinion tablet itself is some kind of computer. However, it has different purpose then pc or laptop and because of it tablets can be so slim and light. Powerful gaming laptops are so heavy because there is a lot of hardware which cannot be replaced by single processing unit.
I think Apple may start using their own processors for their devices. If they would catch up witch price to performance ratio to Intel processors that would be smart move. It would make them independent from another company and allow them to customize their hardware even more.
Peter Clemenza said…
Question 1. Do you own an iPad or any other tablet (not a convertible computer, so Microsoft
Surface doesn’t count)? How often and for what tasks do you use it?

The iPad Pro was proved to be useful in a student environment, but it’s just priceless in a business one especially as a portable notepad. And the voice record function of notability let you get reassured that you grasp every detail of the conversations.
On your way back to home you can even take out iPhone to listen to some details.

Question 2. Do you think tablets will eventually replace traditional computers,
such as laptops and desktop Macs and PCs? What will be the breaking point?

You can't beat a desktop PC for productivity. As far as price goes you will always be able to get
more power for less money with a desktop, and cost sensitivity will always be an issue.
You will never see phones become the prevalent workstations in a cubical farm,
and even in the home you will likely never see phones completely replace the comfort of a decent sized screen with a full sized tactile keyboard and some form of mouse input.
The size of the box that sits next to the monitor/keyboard/mouse will no doubt change as
it already has but you will never see a twenty page report typed out on a phone.
Anyone who says otherwise (including the people at Google who said in 2010 that smartphones would
replace PCs within three years) is attempting to push a shitty product
or one of the morons who bought into the marketing scheme.

Question 3. Having seen the amazing progress in Apple-manufactured silicon,
do you think it’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips in
Macs and ditch Intel once and for all? Why?

The cost of design and production of such chips is tremendous
Marcin Mróz said…
I have never had any kind of tablet, I have always used my computer for the tasks that I couldn't accomplish on my smartphone or just to have bigger screen. I think that being this 'device in the middle' makes tablet for many people simply redundant.
In case of laptops I think it is possible, but I doubt if desktops could be ever replaced by tablets. New iPad Pro can easily replace a laptop in terms of hardware, but some people say that they don't find iOS suitable enough for some tasks that they perform on their laptops. There are also opinions that iOS doesn't allow to unleash the full potential of this new chip.
I think that Apple will definitely start using their ARM chips for Macbooks, it's just a matter of time.
Unknown said…
1. I have neither iPad nor any other kind of tablet, but of course I have used such devices which I have borrowed from my friends and family. Basically, I find them very similar to smartphones but with larger screen and stylus.
2. In my opinion it will not happen in the near future, these devices are designed for different environment and performing different tasks, e.g.: it would take time to make tablets industry standard in banks or offices as current infrastructure is designed for using traditional PCs and laptops .
3. I think that one of the reasons for designing high performance processors by Apple was to be able to replace externally supplied Intel chips with in house CPUs that can increase performance of Macs taking advantage of e.g.: some improvements in processors’ architecture that would better cooperate with Apple OS.
Cezary Róg said…
1. I don't own iPad device, but I'm hardly thinking to get one soon. I'm looking for a good and light solution for travel to do simple stuff like browsing the internet, writing emails and documents but also more complex ones like photo editing or short vieos.

2. It's really hard to say now whether tablets will replace traditional computers. I think that for people that use their computers to write emails, documents or browse documents, a tablet is an awesome solution. But if somebody i.e. edits 4k videos every day then he or she will still need to use a computer because of the computational power and bigger screen. As far as I don't worry that much about the computational power, 12.9-inch screen is still not enough for this kind of work.

3. Well, again hard to say what may happen in the future and if Apple will move this way. The system works awesome with current components. Apple likes to have control over stuff so it's highly possible that finally, they will make it, but I have no idea when.
Unknown said…
That is true that tablet has shrinked gap between PCs but as you mensioned, they still cant support some professional tools. On the other hand what is a difference between laptop and tablet? Like you said, microsoft surface is sometimes missunderstood as a tablet. It just a bit bigger then most tablets and has win 10 installed on it, so we already thinks it is laptop. I think borded between ultrabooks and tablet is shrinking all the time with constant downsizing in tech so we can pack even more power in convinient case.
Unknown said…
I currently have an iPad, it's old, because it's the second model - I think it's already 7 - 8 years old. I use it rarely, but as I use it only to the Internet, because it often stutters. I am thinking now about switching to a newer model.

I think the tablet will never replace a computer. I have recently seen new iPads that came out 2 weeks ago and are great and can be used for very demanding tasks, but I think that the computer will always have an advantage.

I think they can leave Intel as soon as they can create their own layouts. Then they won't be independent from Intel. And, however, it will be a cheaper solution for them for the future. I think so.
Foodocado said…
I have my own iPad 2nd generation, but I am not using it at all. For me, such devices don't have any purpose. I prefer to use my smartphone or laptop instead of an unwieldy tablet.

Laptops are more flexible rather than tablets and support multitasking in the greater way. Therefore, tablets because of their limitations won't replace laptops. However, I like the idea of hybrid computers - a combination of computer and tablet. I think it's a way the producents will go in the nearest future.

It will be a good call for them. However, they need some time to introduce their own chipsets and get rid of Intel.
Piotr Ciesla said…
Yes, I own an iPad. How often do I use it, well every day after work, when I get back home I usually watch some video or listen to the music. Sometimes I draw, many some photo editing. Basically, I use it for everything that is not related to work.

The biggest breakthrough would be if I cold code on my iPad as easily as on my computer. I think tablets will not replace all computers. There is still need for special equipment that only connects to computer.

Probably they will ditch from Intel soon simply because they are just as capable as they are and that could make more money selling their own processors.
Unknown said…
I had a tablet a couple of years age, but I don't use in now at all.

I don't think tablets will replace computers. Computers and hardware that can be connected to them are to complicated to be replaced with the single tablet. And I doubt that tablets can be as powerful as some PC. And I doubt even more that tablets will ever have such customization possibilities as PC, especially if Apple will be the leader on the market.

1. No, I don’t have any. I would probably use it only for watching movies or scrolling reddit.
2. I don’t think it can happen. Tablets are still too far away in doing typical computer stuff. That poor management of I/O is just one of many examples. Another one personally would be staining the screen in a long work session. I would have to wipe the screen every 20minutes to be able to work comfortably. Also, I just prefer trackpad than clicking things on the screen.
3. I think that’s the inevitable path for them but it is still too early. There weren’t any MacBooks with that processor, but I think that Macbook air is a good candidate for that experiment. The difference with the new one and Macbook pro is so little now, that I think it is not very convenient for customers to choose between them. And that’s also the great news for other parts of the market. Intel recently acts like they would have the monopoly and tries to dictate the terms. Maybe a new big player could cause more competitivness in that area
I have an iPad and i got it for free so i can give an unbiased opinion about how shitty it is. I use it almost every evening for reading, i wish i had a normal ebook but i don't. I think tht tablets have already replaced traditional pc's for people who do not need all the functionality of a PC. If you need to browse some youtube, watch funny memes why bother with costly pc? I think that surfacebooks have much more potential though. Ditch Intel once and for all? lol, let's hope they don't charge triple the price for their mediocre processors that can work properly only on one system, one board, one configuration , one dictated and unjustified price.
Unknown said…
I had a tablet a long time ago but only used it for watching movies, listening to music and playing games. I think that most Android tablets and iPads are useless because of their limited functionality. Today if I wanted to buy a tablet I would buy it not only for entertainment but for doing work too and I think it's true for most people who buy expensive tech. You just can't afford or see this illogical to buy an expensive tablet just for sake of watching Netflix for example.
Well, yes and no. I have no doubts that tablets and smartphones will become as powerful as laptops one day but PCs will still be the most popular computer form factor for home computers.
If it's wise idea from business point then yeah. They should try to start making their own chips but I feel that in that case price would probably raise.
Unknown said…
I have an iPad, it is a very useful device that allows you to quickly check information, watch a movie on the road, and you can play a lot of interesting games and that's what I use it for.

I think not, the tablet will never be as efficient as a desktop computer.
Some things are enough but programming, for example, has no chance of success.

I am for it to be so for years apple produces the best goods on the market and they should continue
Question 1. Do you own an iPad or any other tablet (not a convertible computer, so Microsoft Surface doesn’t count)? How often and for what tasks do you use it?
I use MS Surface Pro 4, but more as a 'normal' computer than a table. Very rarely I use the touch-screen, and I am focused on operational functionality. Generally, I have only one computer, so I use the one at work, home and travel. The one + Internet is all-sufficient for me. Much crucial data I store in a data cloud, so I am not worried to lose data with the laptop.
Question 2. Do you think tablets will eventually replace traditional computers, such as laptops and desktop Macs and PCs? What will be the breaking point?
I don't think so. I think here is comming the end of the individual-computer era. We will implement tablets functionality in microwave ovens, cabinets, vacuum cleaners. No computer needed when all staff around us will have processors.
Question 3. Having seen the amazing progress in Apple-manufactured silicon, do you think it’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips in Macs and ditch Intel once and for all? Why?
I am not sure. Let see what's going to happen.
I had a Samsung Tablet a few years ago, but I think only two months because more things I could do directly using my phone that tablet. What tablet can more than a smartphone? I see no benefit ;)
I've seen a useful functionality for tablets in Allegro building in Poznan. The company uses tablets as a conference room panel information. Tablets are close of doors and show details on the meeting schedule.
Unknown said…
Now I haven’t any, but I own one in the past. It was 7 inch Asus. I used it for reading books, watching youtube and playing games.
I don’t think so. Maybe it will be good for designers, but I don’t think that it can render video as well as desktop PC or IMac. Also I think that it’s too small for game dev. Programing on touch screen it’s bad idea, so you should carry with you keyboard and maybe mouse. If you should carry tablet, mouse and keyboard you can replace it with one laptop. Laptops today are slim, light-weight and powerful.
I think that in the nearest future Apple will use only Apple processors in their products. That make sense, because you can control level of security everywhere. Now security of theirs products depends external manufacturer. Most of us hear about Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities in Intel processors. I was one more reason for Apple to produce their own processors.
Unknown said…
No, at the moment I do not have a tablet. I bought an Ipad a mini 5 years ago and were playing games, read books and watching youtube on it play games. Now, this tablet is very slow and often reboots on its own.
No, I think industrial-scale tablets will not replace powerful traditional computers. It could replace laptops in some moment.
It seems to me that the tablet will suit designers.
I believe that many companies are developing something new, not yet used. Therefore, if ARM displaces Intel, there will be a company that displaces ARM.
Unknown said…
I do not currently have any tablet, so I don’t use it :(

Of course, tablets will never replace computers. Touch screen is very nice addition in everyday use but keyboard and the mouse is much more efficient. Tablets have one basic advantage, it is easier to use it by older people without a lot of experience in technology.

Own production of computer components is much more profitable but in my option apple will use subcontractors because in China they can make a lot of components cheaper than in USA.
Do you own an iPad or any other tablet (not a convertible computer, so Microsoft Surface doesn’t count)? How often and for what tasks do you use it?

I am the owner of a tablet from the Sony company (it's already my years), I use it mainly to watch movies on netflix.
You also asked if tablets would displace computers, I think not.

Having seen the amazing progress in Apple-manufactured silicon, do you think it’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips in Macs and ditch Intel once and for all? Why?
For sure you use your own processors because you can match the device to its capabilities
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
I do not own an ipad or any other tablet and i think it is a waste of money nowadays. i use my iphone and laptop for all the tasks i need to do. Tablets are garbage, nobody is using them nowadays. Almost every person is using his phone much more often than pc and 10x times more often than tablets. Definitely, Apple would not use any company's processors in closest future, but we need to wait for it.
I don’t have any type of tablet and I’m happy about it. I don’t need it at all. I’m happy with my phone and PC. I do not have any special tasks to need to do it on tablet.
I think tablets will never replace traditional computers, because it has a bit too small screen. Making its screen bigger, tablets will become non practical. But I believe that it’s enough for many people.
Start using their own ARM chips will make them independent and let them make their products more expensive. But I’m not sure when they change Intel chips for their own it will improves Macs.
Yep, I have one but unfortunately it's quite old. When I bought it, I was so attached to it. Year by year it became much slower which is sad. I haven't touched for around a year.

I'm not sure that it will ever happen. Only if they will be as powerful as gaming laptops, and still I would't be comfortable to play some shooters. So I doubt that tablet will replace a laptop.

To be honest I have no idea because I'd never herd that they were producing ARM chips. I guess if it's going to be reasonable for them to use it e.g cheaper, better performance, independence. So why not ?
Marcin Górski said…
No, I don't have iPad or any other tablet because iPhone/MacBook is enough for me. I'm surfing in the Internet on my phone/laptop and it works well for me. In my opinion, tablet is only waste of money.
No, I don't think tablets will replace traditional computers. I think it will be the opposite and iPads will be withdrawn for sale within a few years. Probably, the same situation as with MP3 or MP4. When I was younger, these devices were very popular? What now? No one use them because smartphones have a lot of additional functions.
I don't know a lot about Apple components but I think that they want to be independent. It's normal situation because thanks for that they can make their devices autonomously. It's what I would do if I were them.
I don't like Mac OS, thus I don't have any Apple devices.

This is impossible in real life, only in theory. Tablets are just a screen for watching movies or playing games, nothing more. Performing "real work" on such devices is inconvenient.

Own production of ARM chips is a good way to increase efficiency and optimize software, but there are many competitors with better price/performance offer on the market.
I think in a way you might see Apple do something more exclusive for iPad, I would imagine their still trying to figure out where to take it next tho. I think you could almost make the statement that iOs system for iPad has gotten slightly outdated. it needs something that's not quite so boundary limited. Its just like when Apple said they would give us magnetic charging on the X and its never been released, instead their waiting for the 12 to release n then most likely let it go, very similar situation.



Yes, I own an iPad (not pro) and it's absolutely amazing . Every day I use it for watching movies or videos, reading different articles and books, listening music or podcasts and sometimes for editing videos/images and "office-tasks". Overall, great auxiliary device which is worth the money.
I don't believe that tablets will replace traditional computers, but it all depends. As an owner of the tablet, I can say that for work and some specific tasks I still need my laptop. But I believe, a lot of people due to the specifics of their work/lifestyle don't need laptops and etc.
Honestly, I am not "tech guy", but it's sounds reasonable for them to start using their own ARM chips for better efficiency of devices and ecosystem. However, I don't doubt that there are nuances concerning technical and business aspects of introducing their own chips.


I don’t have.

I think so. It's hard to say what the critical point will be. I think that this is slowly taking place because I notice more and more people are using a tablet instead of a computer.

I think this is inevitable and Apple will stop using Intel processors forever.
Unknown said…
I do not have any kind of apple products, and i do not use them often, only from time to time at my friend's house.

I am sure that tablets will never replace computers. And though we are committing the computer ending era i don't think that this also going to be soon. Moreover even if it's fascinating to use the touchscreen, it is not really that fast usage, much easier and faster people are using the mouse and keyboard.

Probably its is a good idea to have such a thing for Apple, but on the other side the costs of its creation could be enormous, so it is not certain if it is good or bad.
Thank you for the interesting and informative article. I have iPad Pro. I liked this version of iPad thanks to Apple Pencil and the ability to use the tablet for drawing. I almost bought it, when suddenly my laptop broke down. If I had not studied at the institute, I would not even think which of the gadgets I need. But I chose a laptop. No matter, how powerful, ergonomic or practical the iPad be, it cant able to replace the laptop. And the developers deliberately limited the tablet in this direction. If the MacBook operating system were on the iPad, then it would be possible to install various programs for work. At the moment, everything depends on the meager choice of applications in the apple store. As a result, I bought iPad and actively use it for drawing. But it will not replace the laptop or computer or a long time.
Unknown said…
The whole idea of the fastest tablet on the market and faster than 92% of computers is pointless, just as its price is pointless. I do not have a tablet or any product from Apple. I have a Surface Book 2 which is enough for my mobile work. I am just writing this comment on the train on my Surface Book coming back from Bialystok.
I do not think that tablets will replace computers, but they will merge into hybrids as it does today, an example of this is Surface Book from Microsoft. Mobility and accessibility in every situation will be a turning point of this technology.
Most people can not afford their latest products. What Apple presents at the moment does not move the technology forward even by a step, such processors could already be used earlier in tablets, while costs did not allow it. By paying several thousand zlotys for a tablet, I would rather buy a laptop and a desktop computer at the same price.
Szymon Gibalski said…
1) Do you own an iPad or any other tablet (not a convertible computer, so Microsoft Surface doesn’t count)? How often and for what tasks do you use it?
- Yes, I have got an iPad Mini. I have bought it because I wanted to read on it and play mobile games like. Right now it is too old to play video games, so I only use it to read PDFs files and watch Netflix while travelling.
2) Do you think tablets will eventually replace traditional computers, such as laptops and desktop Macs and PCs? What will be the breaking point?
- I think that tablets will not replace desktop Macs and PCs because of cooling and performance of bigger machines but I think that tablets and laptops will become the same device - just take a look at Microsoft Surface Pro.
3) Having seen the amazing progress in Apple-manufactured silicon, do you think it’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips in Macs and ditch Intel once and for all? Why?
- Probably yes, it is always better to create every part by yourself so your company is independent of others.
Ahmed Elsawi said…
Question 1. Do you own an iPad or any other tablet (not a convertible computer, so Microsoft Surface doesn’t count)? How often and for what tasks do you use it?

Yes, I have a Samsung tablet It stays on my wardrobe, I don't use it a lot, I used just it for Android tests.
..........................................................................................................

Question 2. Do you think tablets will eventually replace traditional computers, such as laptops and desktop Macs and PCs? What will be the breaking point?

Actually, until now no, I think tablet or any device depends on personality works, In general, everyone searches about the flexibility on (his / her) device to be useful for life or work, I think for the user! PCs or laptops will win.
the breaking point the future will determine it.
..........................................................................................................

Question 3. Having seen the amazing progress in Apple-manufactured silicon, do you think it’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips in Macs and ditch Intel once and for all? Why?

Apple is a unique company, It’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips to be masters of the next future.
Marcin Zając said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Marcin Zając said…
Question 1. Do you own an iPad or any other tablet (not a convertible computer, so Microsoft Surface doesn’t count)? How often and for what tasks do you use it?
Currently not, but in the past I had ipad 2 and I was using it mainly for web browsing, some gaming and video watching when travel.

Question 2. Do you think tablets will eventually replace traditional computers, such as laptops and desktop Macs and PCs? What will be the breaking point?
I think tablets won't replace computers. Companies like Apple don't want to, becouse tablets are additional products for the same user to buy.

Question 3. Having seen the amazing progress in Apple-manufactured silicon, do you think it’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips in Macs and ditch Intel once and for all? Why?
It's difficult to say. I think Apple'd like to switch to their own manufactured processors, but is not as easy as we can think for example waht with bootcamp?
In the past Apple switch from PowerPC to Intel so they can do similar thing.
In my opinion there is very good video about that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VObg5BiXx6I&index=169&list=WL
Unknown said…
In my opinion tablets are something quite useless. They couldn't get dominant position on the market with mobile phones and laptops. Phones are more convenient to use and laptops that usually have better characteristics than tablets can also be lightweight and thin. So for what purpose tablets exist? What competitive advantage it has?

It's little bit silly to combine words Apple and progress because last their inventions are inconvenient and horrible.
Unknown said…
1. No, I don't have any tablet. I simply don't find it usefull in my lifestyle. I like my laptop with physical keyboard and 15" screen. Also got an standard iphone 8, I'm not a huge fan of big screens ;)

2. I think, that probably in the future tablets could be at the same level as camputers, with similiar performance. But in my opinion PC will always be PC, easier to manage and replace parts. I think gamers will stick to it, artis and creators on the other hand probably change to the tablet, because of it usability and simplicity.

3. As far as Apple are concerned the own ARM chips could be a good option - if the'll be be as good as their Iphone technology, they can win the market. It's great opportuinty for them to become fully independent.
Yes, I use the tablet. I need it. I like to lie on a sofa and to read articles on the Internet. It is more entertainment, than something necessary.
I consider that it will be not soon. Tablets are still too weak to compete with the computer.
And here with the third question. It will show us time. The world of technologies is unpredictable!
I think that computers is all electronic that can compute something and this is doesn't mean that it must be exactly usual PC. I think that even modern phone can be used as fully functional alternative for PC in most tasks.

I don't have any electronic from apple but.

I think that all companies make huge progress for portable devices and not only Apple. So I think that there no reason to tell that Apple is the only company that make something.
ExoKuzo said…
My tablet game at the moment is weak after my last one broke i haven't gotten around to replace it yet with a new on, because i dont feel like i need to. When mine was working though i have used it extensively for checking mail and browsing internet on the go, reading and for school be it for taking or reading my notes.

No they wont, tablets are just tad bit small to house whats needed for devices longevity battery and component wise. Most users dont want to get Apple'd when they are buying portable solutions and we like our things to last and be relevant for years to come

No not at all, 5 trillion (that’s 12 zeroes) operations per second its ARM so "simple" compared to Intels offering operations per second. While there is a case to ditch the x86 operation set ARM's are long way till they can replace any of Intels processors.
Maciej Nowak said…
I am actually writing this comment on a convertible laptop and I don't have any tablet. And when it comes to tablet mode in my computer then i still don't use it isn't practical for me. I only like that i can turn my screen up to 360 degrees so it easy to get comfortable on a coach. I don't think that tablets will ever replace traditional computers as they are designed for different work environment and tasks. I need fast PC, 2 monitors, nice keyboard and a mouse to program efficiently. If Apple will be able to produce good quality processors as Intel does, then they probably would prefer to use their own processor.
Unknown said…
Now i don’t own an iPad or any other tablet and never have those things before but after new iPad premiere i am thinking about getting one. Now I consider if I really need any tablet even if i have 3 computers at home.
I think that it is not possible. Tablets are on the market many years and since that nothing really changed in PC industry.
Apple are pioneers in new technologies and try to be independent so this is very possible scenario.
Unknown said…
1. Nope I don't have cause I don't need it. My phone and Nintendo Switch is enough for me for travel. Beeing at home/ in work / in PJATK I'd prefer stationary PC. Better performence, big screens (for example I use 3 at work). Tablet is small, gives much less tools to work with :/

2. Never, never, never. there are many things like work that can only be done on "expensive massive PCs". Really the breaking point will be never cause of performance loss on tablets and unconfortable little screen.

3. I don't think that Apple will make better processors than Intel. Okay, Apple's software is just fine, but the hardware in their products... please... it's trash.
Unknown said…
Question 1. Do you own an iPad or any other tablet (not a convertible computer, so Microsoft Surface doesn’t count)? How often and for what tasks do you use it?
I don't have any tablet of my own and I don't really want one. I can't find any reasonable argument, which would convince me to buy one.
Question 2. Do you think tablets will eventually replace traditional computers, such as laptops and desktop Macs and PCs? What will be the breaking point?
I think they already had a breaking point and it's selling will decrease. Mobile is perfect for compact usage and pc/laptop for full experience.
Question 3. Having seen the amazing progress in Apple-manufactured silicon, do you think it’s inevitable for them to start using their own ARM chips in Macs and ditch Intel once and for all? Why?
I think that iPhones have proved us that Apple produces the best mobile processors, it is a matter of time to put Apple's original CPUs to their laptops.
In your answer to Question 2, you compared a smartphone to a PC but that was not the point.

What data are you basing your claim about the cost, though? Apple has been making custom chips for years now, I don't think the production of a custom one is more expensive than licensing it from Intel. Currently, Mac is Apple's only product line that has Intel chips in it. If your claim was true, it wouldn't be the case.
Well, I recommend the 9.7" iPad or iPad Pro, both 2018 generations. :)

I recently saw a video on YouTube in which a professional studio editor used the latest iPad pro for editing a 4K video. He was surprised to find out that it was smoother than on some models of MacBook Pros. Keep in mind that A12X chip is rivaling some models of Intel Core i7!
Yeah, I own the same model and I don't do much with it, except watching videos from time to time.

However, when I go for a holiday I tend to not take my computer and instead take my iPad. I just realized I've been fully able to do everything on it that was not related to my work — and that's what I think makes tables a desirable product.
Apple would not compete with Intel. ARM is an open architecture and Apple would only use it in their own products, not sell and license them like Intel or AMD does.

I think the most difficult part of transitioning would be the processor architecture. Apple would have to manage the lack of Intel's X86-64 somehow.
Keep in mind that programming can have various forms. For example, if it was possible to develop iOS apps on iPad, that would be a huge deal. Even now, there are code editors for iPad and I saw people use them sometimes. Mostly beginners but hey — lowering the bar for entering the programming industry is always cool.
ARM is not a company selling chips, like Intel. They only license the architecture specification as intellectual property and then Apple and other chip makers produce the chips themselves.
Do you have any data to back up your claim that nobody uses tablets? I think this generalization is completely wrong — tablet sales have been steady for a long time, with more than 150 milion devices sold every year since 2013.
I specifically asked for any tablet, not any Apple device. Based on your answer, it seems you haven't read the article or watched the video.
Yes, I completely agree. iPad definitely has better hardware than software. iOS on iPad is not using its full potential to the highest level, which is annoying. I hope Apple has recognized the problem and will present a solution in the near future (iOS 13?).
How do you like drawing on iPad with Apple Pencil? Would you recommend it as a device for illustrators and designers?
I asked whether you own a tablet, not a convertible computer (and specifically mentioned that Surface is one of them) for a reason. Convertible computers are not tablets and they are not iPad's competition.

I'm pretty confident that your claims about not moving the industry, performance and cost are not backed by any data, just negative emotions towards Apple. One googling would be enough to find counterevidence.
I'm very happy to finally see a comment from a person who is familiar with the industry. I'm familiar with the video you linked and I fully agree with you and Rene.
You're not a fan of big screens but own a 15" laptop? How's that? :D

The gaming aspect you mentioned is a very valid argument. The fact that you put (or attach) a high performance GPU in your PC is a huge deal.
It took me one googling to find that the best consumer laptop CPU from Intel (6-core i9-8950HK 4.2GHz) does 302 bilion operations per second. That's over 16 times less. The best consumer desktop CPU (18-core i9-7980XE 4.79GHz) does 1 trilion operations per second. That's 5 times less. I see you didn't bother to find any evidence to support your claims.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and natura...

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds...

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?