Skip to main content

Week 12 [22.01.2018 - 28.01.2018] What made Sheryl Sandberg successful?


            Sheryl Sandberg is listed first on Forbes’ list of world’s most powerful women. She started conquering technology industry by working at Google after that she’s gone to work for Facebook where she holds a position of Chief Operating Officer. She is also a first woman to be elected as a member of Facebook’s board of directors. Sandberg put on paper her journey to success and her will to lead in a book called “Lean in” where she gives many pointers on how to be apart of this game and how to get to the top.

             The book is called “Lean in” and that is a piece of advice she would give to anyone no matter what. It simply means be involved, go out and get to know people and let’s be honest it’s good piece of advice it’s not that common for computer scientists to socialize. But it’s even more than that it’s not only for your own good you should lean in so you would be recognized so people would say “oh yea I remember her she was in my chess club”.

source: npr.com

            A significant amount of this book is dedicated to speaking up and seizing the opportunity not waiting for it to be offered to you – that may never happen. Even when you feel under qualified and think your CV is not good enough for a position that you really want there’s no harm in trying. But is also about speaking up figuratively you want something – do something.

            As always to succeed you have to be well –organized and you have to be able to plan ahead. Sheryl Sandberg also didn’t leave this part out. She suggests having both long and short - term plan. Long - term plan being dreams for the future meanwhile the 18-month plan being more about goals that you can start achieving right this moment.


            The part that shocked me the most was that getting to the top is not about saying “yes” it’s more about saying “no” to yourself and to others. You can’t peruse every idea that pops into your head and also you can’t agree to do everything other people ask you to do. Sandberg confesses that it was Mark Zuckerberg that told her during her first formal meeting that desire to be liked by everyone would hold her back.

            This powerful woman visualizes career path not as ladder but as something more of a jungle gym and she encourages everyone to do so as well. This way you won’t get stuck at some kind of dead end and you won’t be perusing the conventional path. Sandberg writes: “Jungle gyms offer more creative exploration”. There are many ways to get to the top and that gives all of us a little bit of hope.

  1. Have you read Sandberg’s book? Do you recommend any other books on self-development?
  2. Do you agree that saying “yes” to one idea means saying “no” to other opportunities?
  3. What type of planning do you prefer? Do you think that having both a short-term and long-term plan is a good idea?  


Comments

Unfortunately, I have not read any of Sheryl's books.
Answering to second question: yeah I agree with that. A lot of people are not very confident and they agree for everything. Having skill of saying no and being able to discuss it's something really useful.
Every person is different so for one person having both short-term and long-term plans may be a good thing and for others it will not work.
Unknown said…
Why did you change your mind to posting this article instead of the one about the Grand Central Terminal you showed me before? It was super interesting and I looked forward to seeing it here!

When it comes to planning, I do think that it is super important to both have a short and long term plan, and have them work together.

I don't necessary agree that "yes" for one idea means "no" to another, but I do agree that it's important to be able to say no. After all, it's important to do what's important/profitable/what you want to do, instead to do what others what you to do.
sasha | s14611 said…
Yes, it's good idea to have both a short-term and long-term plan. You short-term plan should always help you to achieve long-term target. The same principle is used in scrum framework. Based on scrum, you have sprint (it's 1-4 week period of time) when you focus on some goal. On each day of the sprint you plan what to do to achieve the main goal of the sprint, and step by step, day by day the sprint goal become achieved. Using the same principle in real life could really change your life.
Unknown said…
I have never read this book, but thanks to you it sounds interesting.
I totally agree to saying 'yes' to opportunities - this is how I got my first job. My CV was poor, but I did good at interview and they hired me. Now, I can develop my skills and take up new challenges
I've got few plans - short ones, as for now, and long term one - but this one is high level plan (no details)
I agree with you that by saying ‘yes’ we become more open to new ideas experiences.
Wow what an interesting idea of implementing scrum framework into your everyday life.
Unfortunately it wasn’t up to me. I’m glad you found the other article interesting. Grand Central Terminal has many more secrets - you should definitely check them out!
I think saying 'no' is an important skill if you have limited resources. Otherwise why not say 'yes' to everything you find interesting?
Yevhen Shymko said…
Haven't heard about the book before but would love to read it. Last book about productivity that I've read was a classic one "Getting things done". It's been written something like 20 years abo but the method of organizing things still sufficient. It helped me organize all the staff that was floating around my head and put it into writing in organize way. Actually polish application Nozbe is one of the tool created with GTD in mind and would recommend to all of you who need some tool to manage your tasks.
Marcin Górski said…
I have never read any Sheryl Sandberg's book but this one sounds great. I agree that saying “yes” to one idea means saying “no” to other opportunities. I think that we should choose what is the most important for us. I don't have best way to planning my life. I like to have a lot of short-term and some long-term plans. Thanks for that I can do my best.
1. I’ve read Sandberg’s book and I’ve read about her. She is one of the most inspiring person I’ve ever heard. Her strength comes from her open-mindness and the ability to go farther without looking back, but looking ahead.
2. Actually I try to act consequently in my life, because I believe that it is important to concentrate energy on one aim, rather than to spread it for many targets. However, sometimes exceptionally I can work on compromising, if I can feel it doesn’t disturb my internal rules.
3. My long-term plans usually are free from any details. They concern general idea of the targets I want to achieve. In this respect definitely I need such plans to have full picture of my “milestones” in my mind. However, for everyday life, those big plans have to indicate particular steps to be taken, so as gaining “milestones” could be possible. But the difference is in a way I treat the assumptions – I try to keep the big plans, while the everyday ones I can adapt to the dynamic situation, if it happens.
I’m really glad to hear that you’ve read this book! I find her very inspiring as well that’s why i’ve written this post :) I think it’s a good idea not to put details into you long-term plan - you avoid being disappointed when thing turn out not the way you’ve planned.
I’ve heard great things about “Getting things done”. Your review definitely convinced me to read it. Thanks! :)
Alicja said…
I haven't read Sandberg’s book. I don't have interest in this kind of books.

Your second question remained be about what Steve Jobs said on a conference:
“People think focus means saying yes to the thing you've got to focus on. But that's not what it means at all. It means saying no to the hundred other good ideas that there are. You have to pick carefully. I'm actually as proud of the things we haven't done as the things I have done. Innovation is saying no to 1,000 things.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8eP99neOVs

I have a zen approach to planning: have an awareness to seize the opportunities and go with the flow. I plan how to complete particular tasks and achieve goals but I don't try to plan too far into the future.
Unknown said…
I havent read her book and I rather don't have a problem with motivation to self-development so i don't read book in this type.
If it comes to your second question i think it's true. We always have many opportunities. When we choose one option then we lose other. It's worth to think what we can loose but I think that the best way is think about optiosn, choose one and never back to lost opportunities. I often think back to my past choices and I wonder what would happen if I chose differently. It's really unfavorable and disruptive. Thinking like mine hinders focusing on the present and my goal. So why i try to stop think about the past like that.

I love planning and i always have a plan for my further and closer future. I often update my plans and change them so that they are the best in relation to the current situation.
Unknown said…
I haven't read Sandberg’s book. I don't read books about self development. I rather read special informatics literature. When I was young I read Harry Potter. I think saying “yes” to one idea means saying “no” to other ideas is not corrent. You can always say "yes" to many ideas. But sometimes they are different and in such situations you can't say "yes" to all of them. I think having as many as you can remember plans is a good idea. If you can have more plans then why not having them?
Jakub Lisicki said…
I haven't read any of her books, but after reading this article, I'm pretty sure that I'll look into one of them. She sounds to be a pretty well-organised and successful figure, but it's worth verifying if that's as true as it sounds by reading what she has to say.
It's pretty often true that saying "yes" to one thing means saying "no" to another. It's worth time to plan ahead and decide what's better for us in a long-term arrangements instead of accepting the inevitable after it's too late.
I think that having both long-term and short-term plan isn't just a good idea - it's a neccessity. We can't just live our lives with having only long or short-term plans. (Or maybe we can? I believe it's a bad idea, though.)
Having short-term and long-terms goals is very important. We work the best if we divide complex matters into a simple milestones that our brain is capable of getting a grasp on. This is especially visible in programming, where you're forced to think like that, simply because you're not capable of keeping in mind all complex details of the target program, you have to focus on small independent parts of it, and then connect all of them in one bigger thing that makes use of them. Otherwise, you're bound to fail.
Unfortunately, I didn't read any of Sandberg's books. Yes, I agree with the second statement, when people do not have their opinion and follow in the footsteps of the leader. I think that you should plan both in the long-term and in the short-term.
If only I was as driven as I am lazy...
Obviously you need to put your own good first to climb so high up the corporation ladder. People you meet along the way can help you in some manner, but a fellow night-shift basic level Java programmer probably won't help you get all the way to the top.

I agree that having both a short and a long-term plan is vital. It allows you to prioritize, as well as split large tasks into smaller, easily achievable goals.
I haven’t read Sandberg’s book and to be honest I have never heard of her before.
I do not agree that “saying yes to one idea means saying no to other opportunities”, you should always say no to drugs for example :P
Long time planning can’t be really accomplished without a series of short term plans.
Frankly speaking, I hear the name of this woman first. Although the article is very interesting and makes you think about many things. I think I would gladly read the book that Sheryl wrote. Recently, I have huge problems with self-development, time planning, and discipline. Perhaps that statement that saying “yes” to one idea means saying “no” to other opportunities, is truthful. But we always make a choice, our whole life consists of a choice. When one door is closed, another door will open. I think that it is impossible to look into the future, and we do not know what will lead us to a certain path. But it is worthwhile to be rational and try to calculate your actions and prospects.
No I haven't read Scheryl's book yet and i don't any books about self-development. Yes i agree with that statement. I mean - it's obvious. When we choose to do something in some way it's hard to do that in other ways. I prefer short-term planning because it's always hard to plan yourself in long-term.
Unknown said…
No, I haven't read her books, however, I would like to try it once
I agree with this statement, because sometimes we have to focus on something particular to get the best results than to disprese
I think it's better to a have plan in any case because it helps to concentrate our effort on doing particular things
Magdalena Popek said…

I've never heard about the book "Lean in", but now I have to read it.
I somehow agree that saying "yes" to one idea is saying "no" to the other, but it's not always true. It's important to do what's important to you and not what others may find important or iteresting. So saying "yes" to one idea is saying "yes" to something you find important.

I think both short and long time planning is important. Long time planning, I mean your aim. Short term planning is what helps you achieve it.
Unknown said…
Unfortunately I haven't read any Sandberg's book or other books about self development...
I don't think that saying "yes" to one idea means saying "no" to other opportunities. You shouldn't be so limited. You have to check many possibilities.
In my opinion having short term and long term plan is a very good idea. Success in achieving short-term plans can set us positive on big goals. Step by step to make your dreams come true!
Zygmunt Z said…
I have never read Sandberg's books. I also can't recommend any other books about self-development as I am not interested in this type of books. I can't agree with the second question that saying "yes" to one idea means saying "no" to other opportunities, for example drugs. And finally I think that one type of planning depends on the other - without short goals, you rather don't achieve the long-term ones
Unknown said…
>Have you read Sandberg’s book? Do you recommend any other books on self-development?
Nope, I believe its best to find your own way of dealing with things and go your own path, of course if it's not anything dumb...
>Do you agree that saying “yes” to one idea means saying “no” to other opportunities?
Usually it does- radiobuttons for example, also some bigger decisions in your life can't be undone.
>What type of planning do you prefer? Do you think that having both a short-term and long-term plan is a good idea?
A short term plan should at least somehow lead to the long-term one, otherwise it won't work, at least for me. Define a long-term objective, make preparations for it during shot-term smaller objectives, and finish it without bigger effort thanks to the successes of your smaller plans.
Yes I definitely agree with you - you should always say “no” to drugs.
I’m really glad that my article convinced you to read this book. It’s very inspiring!
Yes I definitely agree with you - you should always say “no” to drugs.
I agree self development books are a good thing but there’s nothing better than learning from your own experiences.
It’s great to hear that you’ve read Harry Potter I really love those books. So many young people grew up reading them and fighting the bad people alongside Harry so I guess they are some kind of self-development books :)
She has many more interesting things to say so I definitely recommend that you read this book :)

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?