Skip to main content

Week 10 [08.01 - 14.01.2018] Do we still need to have our own cars ?

If you have your own car,  then have you ever wondered how much time do you actually use one ? Answers can be different depending on people’s job, lifestyle, living place etc. but according to transportation advisers [1], on average, cars are parked 95 % of the time. Every car owner knows that car ownership costs are significant or even high compared to average household spending. These facts can lead to a question: “Why buy a car when you can borrow it ?” Additionally, when we take big cities into consideration where transport is of great importance, there are number of scenarios when people need cars occasionally or for short periods of time e.g.: only when they can’t or don’t want to use public transport.  

Of course we all know about car rentals, however, traditional car rental model is too expensive and not convenient enough to be an alternative for car ownership or public transport. This is the area where car sharing concept is coming into play as a part of sharing economy and future of mobility services. Car sharing is a car rental model primarily designed for short-time and short-distance usage in big cities. According to "Car Sharing In Europe" Deloitte report [2] there are at least three major car sharing business models which differ in flexibility, cost, vehicle types and entities involved:


  • Free floating car sharing  
This is a car sharing model where customers can pick up and return cars in any place within a special zone, most often in central parts of the cities and near airports or railway stations. Once you are registered  in the car sharing provider’s system and have mobile app installed, you just search for the nearest car, reserve it and you have 15-30 minutes to pick it up from the place where it is currently parked e.g.: a street, public parking or an airport. You usually open a selected car’s door using mobile app and keys are usually in the glove box with its registration and insurance documents. There are two pricing models: first based on time only and second combining time and distance. Car sharing providers cover parking fees in metered parking zones so you don’t have to worry about tickets. It is also quite easy to park such a car as providers usually offer small city cars like Smart or Toyota Yaris. You can leave a car at any place which is inside the provider’s zone and is in compliance with parking laws and regulations in a particular area. Fuel costs are also covered by a car sharing provider and usually there is a fuel card provided in the glove box next to the car keys.

This is the most flexible and convenient model of car sharing. You pay only for time and/or distance that you actually used the car for and you can return it at a place of your choice. There are many car sharing providers operating in free floating model and the biggest ones are: car2go(Germany, USA, Canada, China, Austria, Italy, Netherlands and Spain) and recently zipcar(USA, Canada, Belgium, France, Spain, UK). In Warsaw there are already three free-floating car sharing providers: PANEK CarSharing, Traficar and 4Mobility

http://media.daimler.com/marsMediaSite/en/instance/picture/Berlin-Car2Go.xhtml?oid=7580994


  • Stationary car sharing
Stationary car sharing services are more like traditional car rentals and are meant for longer distances e.g.: between different cities or during weekend tours around a particular region. The main difference and main disadvantage is that we can’t pick up and return cars at random locations but only in designated parking lots or fixed rental stations. It is inflexible for customers as they have to plan their trips with respect to rental station locations and in fact they can’t use cars in the way they would like to. The biggest players are: Flinkster(Germany, Switzerland) and Stadtmobil(Germany). In Warsaw 4Mobility uses also this operating model and offers a bit more prestigious cars (compared to to their free-floating offer) like Mini and BMW 1 and 3 series as well as fancy electric BMW i3

http://polskaparkuje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/4Mobility_electric_view1.jpg


  • P2P car sharing
Unlike the free-floating and stationary models, in which operators provide cars, peer-to-peer model is based on cars belonging to private users. P2P car sharing systems only provide a platform which connects car owners with users, providing insurance and enabling cars to be tracked. The main advantage compared to car sharing providers is the variety of cars available to the user. The process of renting a car is also different here and is usually based on planning your trip in advance with specific dates and a car of your choice. As a next step, platform matches the best offer from available private car owners and  after booking, you have to meet the car owner and sign the rental agreement. Its pricing model is also different here and usually a user pays for days he uses a car. This kind of service is rapidly gaining popularity in USA and Canada and the biggest P2P car sharing platform there is Turo. In my opinion this is an advantageous  alternative for traditional car rentals e.g.: when you are planning to travel across USA or Canada. This is also a great opportunity to drive some really cool cars like Tesla, Porsche 911 or Nissan GT-R for a reasonable price.

http://www.ineedmoneyasap.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Tesla-on-Turo-Airbnb-for-Cars.jpg



Questions:
1.    Have you ever used any car sharing service ?
2.    What kind of advantages can car sharing bring ?
3.    Would you consider replacing having your own car with using car sharing services in the future ? Please give some cons and pros of such a solution

References:
 

Comments

Unknown said…
I have never used any car sharing service.
Car sharing has got some pros, like it may be cheaper than buying ang maintain a car. It may be good especially for someone, who need car from time to time. It also give a chance to ude many different cars, so you can decide what you like - maybe some parameters of cars, maybe some brands.
Pros of replacing own car for car sharing are mentioned above, but there are also a cons, like: you may not have a car when you'll need it. There is limited number of sharing car and there may be nothing for you left. You don't know who was using it before you - maybe he/she had commited some crime and this car is being searched by police? Maybe person before you is messy type and there is a great mess inside, so you have to clean it even a little, so you can enjoy your ride? There may be no valid information about when it was the last at mechanican, what had happened to this car, it there is something wrong with it or id there may be any problems.
I thing that I would ude such solution for example abroad, when taking taxis is too expansive, and I'm there for some limited time.
Unknown said…
Paulina, thanks for sharing your thoughts. I totally agree with you that this kind of cars can be easily used to commit crimes. Although all car sharing providers track their cars and exact time you use it, there is always a risk of getting into troubles after renting a car which had been used for crime few moment earlier.
Arguments concerning condition of the cars are also valid and I think it will be one of the biggest challenges for providers to keep their cars clean and roadworthy.
Unknown said…
There are some cases in which cars are used every day. There are a lot of countries that don't have strong public transport system. As an example - Kiev, Ukraine. This is a large city with about 3 million registered citizens(actually there are more then 6 millions), in which you either have to use terrible metro or own a car. All other types of transport like buses, trolleybuses and trams are underdeveloped.
But personally I'd rather rent a car than buy it, since I prefer bicycle as a primary vehicle in a city.
Anonymous said…
I have never used this sharing system. A couple of times I rent a car, but it's not the same.
In my opinion the main advantage is that you can leave a car whenever you want to. It could be a great solution for driving a cor to a party and then come back home by taxi and not have to worry about your car.
I would never consider resigning of having a car. Just because I love having a car. I'm caring about it, I wash it, I can leave my stuff in it. I'm just used to having a car.
I haven't used any of car sharing services, unfortunately. I think that it may save money sometimes, for example when you are using bla bla car. Despite car sharing, there is a thing called public transport. During times when you can have 100 books on your kindle, watch tv series on your phone or have gaming console like Nintendo Switch, I don't get it why so many people does not use public transport.
Unknown said…
What a wonderful article! I was just thinking about cars yesterday, I would like to have one, but I'm not sure whether I wanna live for a long period of time in the same city/country. And it's easier to sell a car than move it to another country or even mainland.
But when it comes to big cities, it's not that convenient and even reasonable to have a car. Especially in rush hour.
I like the first idea about Free floating car sharing. It remindes me of Veturilo system with bicycles.
I’ve never used any of the car sharing services you’ve mentioned. I’ve used a bla bla car though. It was very convenient considering it was Sunday and no bus was leaving from this middle of nowhere town I was in. Although from the point of view of a person living in the suburbs car sharing services aren’t that great. There are no cars or stations around and car is actually needed quite often. Therefore no - I would not replace my car with using those services. Apart from reasons I’ve mentioned above there are more disadvantages like really bad insurance policy or unnecessary stress related to using different car every time. I guess it’s a good solutions for people living in the city when they need a car now and then but I wouldn’t treat it as an alternative for public transport.
Unknown said…
Thank you for sharing your opinion, also from my experience living in suburbs can be a painful when it comes to commuting and in such a case car sharing services can’t help. I agree that car sharing cannot be considered as public transport alternative in big cities, however, it is significantly cheaper than owning a car assuming occasional usage.
Unknown said…
Thanks for commenting on my article. I get your point with preferring bicycle over other means of transport, but we all know that sometimes it is just not possible to go somewhere by bike. You’ve mentioned that public transport in Kiev is not efficient enough, so do you think car sharing services would be a good fit in this case ?
Unknown said…
I have never used any car sharing aps but recently I downloaded Traficar. I think it is a very good idea . It's alternative way to UBER. I saw that this kind of city transport is too expensive during the day. I mean traffic jams. I still prefer Uber but maybe in the near future this kind of transport will be developed. Who knows? When I heard about it for the first time I was very surprised. And I asked how it worked? It happened when my friend used this kind of car. I asked him where he left the car keys and he told me that in the car compartment.
Unknown said…
Thanks for speaking your mind Sylwia. I totally agree with your last three sentences and I just can’t imagine not having my own car even though it is not cost-effective. However, there are many people for whom car is a just another mean of transport and in my opinion they are more likely to switch to this kind of services as soon as it will suit their needs.
Unknown said…
Thanks for your feedback and I am glad that you liked the article. In addition to what you’ve mentioned in the second sentence, in my opinion, car sharing services can be a perfect solution for people who are temporarily living abroad e.g.: during student exchanges or temporary job assignments.
Unknown said…
I have never used any car sharing service and I don't think I will.
It probably may help to reduce the amount of cars in big cities. Some people only need cars from time to time. The other advantage is that you don't have to pay for repairs and maintenance of the vehicle. Sharing companies would probably buy electric cars and it would reduce the pollution in the cities.
When it comes to me, I wouldn't replace my car. Having your own car makes you independent. You don't rely on anybody. Also you are sure that your car is in a good condition, because your care about it. Cars from sharing services might be damaged or stop working during the ride. Only disadvantage of having your own car is that you have to care about it, but in my opinion it's not a big deal.
Unknown said…
I used "Panek" car sharing service one time for really short way. It was nice experience but not necessery. Of course, car sharing bring us this comfort that we don't need to think about car repairs and car reviews or even tire change. For people who hate things like that it's great option. But i love own a car beacuse for me it's like my second, very small home. Driving is my passion so i very often I get in the car and go for a ride unexpectedly. It makes me feel free so i can't imagine that i don't have my own car.
Marcin Górski said…
I have never used sharing system because I have my own car. In my opinion the most important advantage is price. You don't have pay everyday, only when you want to drive. Secondly, it may have a good effect on environment because systems like that often use electric cars.
I would never change my car. It's the same situation like renting a flat. You have to think about everything (repairs etc.) and pay more but it's your own.
I have never used any car sharing services.
Can sharing can reduce the air pollution in cities (electric cars). Sharing a car instead of having one has the advantage of not worring about renting a garage/ renting parking space near your house.
Renting a car in big cities is convenient so maybe I will decide to rent a car.
Maciej Główka said…
I have never used car sharing services, although there are 3? in Warsaw. As you mentioned in article, the biggest advantage is having a car without extra expenses like car service, parking rent etc. I am a petrol head, so cars I drive and own are quite important for me. That's why in near future I'm sure I won't use any car sharing service. Cars you can rent in Warsaw are to boring for me ;)
Unknown said…
I think that car sharing would be more expensive, because without transport system you have to drive to your work and back to home every working day, not mentioning any other places you want to visit. And the distances between two points can be really large. So it is easier to buy your own car and pay for fuel and parking only.
1. Never. I've never even seen one of those free floating or stationary ones. I don't rly know how it works etc.
2. As i don't really understand i can think of any advantages. Only one is this p2p which is kinda cool. Somthing like AirBnb for cars.
3. Never, i like to have my own so i can have it on every hour everywhere and im the only one responsible for it so i know it wont break down etc. Also i like just to tinker around it sometimes.
I havent used any car sharing services yet but id imagine it being nothing more than a taxi without a driver most of the time more costly too.
Bring the advantages are already here - Services like Turo strive on foreginers who come for a short peroids of time and need a mean of convinient transportation. Also u can check out used versions of a car u might be planning to buy in near future.
I would never replace my car with such service:
Cons:
- You are dependant on the service otherwise you are without the car(they might be out of cars in your area im not talking about car breaking)
- You have no control over to what standart the cars are being taken care of - with my car i have knowledge of what's fine and what's wrong, what the car have been through etc with a loaner u have no idea .
- Having own car (while market dependant)is more economical than using a loaner. You are likely to recoup part of the car costs on its sale balancing whole investment out. With a loaner u re basically using a taxi in wich u have to pay attention, and you are responsible for damages. And u have to tank it.

Pros:
- You dont have to care about maintenance of a car.
- You can pull out of loaner as is not an investment (Taxi is still better though)
- You have control over your ride unlike in taxi - u want a stop at stabucks sure in taxi that will be 30pln/h
- You can behave and do what you want(to some extent)in the car unlike in the taxi.
- Great for foreginers, u dont need to worry about being scammed just type in location into gps and off you go.
-You can "loan" a car u wish to buy, think about buying with services like Turo
I've never used car sharing before, but it sounds quite interesting. I don't own a car. I live, worn and study in Warsaw, so I usually am able to get wherever I need to go to using city transport. It is however a bit inconvenient to do your Sunday shopping this way, so a rental car would be a great solution for me, certainly cheaper than using UBER.

Unfortunately I do foresee some problems with the free floating model, mostly the same ones we see with city bikes. The biggest one: People tend to go to certain places at certain times of the day (work, church, home). Its virtually impossible to always provide enough supply at the moment and place its needed (unless you'd hire people to move cars around to accommodate for expected future demand in specific areas).
Unknown said…
Thanks for commenting on my article. You’ve mentioned quite important issue – them impact car sharing services have on the environment. Beside the fact car sharing providers use hybrid or electric cars with reduced emissions, the second important aspect is that car sharing model can lead to reduction of the overall number of cars in big cities, which I think would be beneficial for all of us.
Unknown said…
Thanks for sharing your experience, did you encounter any problems with using Panek service e.g. registration, picking up or returning your car ? From the comments posted here and talks I have with different people, I think it all comes down to whether people treat cars in a practical way or more like a hobby/passion. Former would not have problems with not having own car or renting it occasionally as they are often used to public transport or bicycle, the latter value having own car and freedom it gives them, although it is not always the most cost-effective solution.
Unknown said…
Thanks for your comment. I am sure that there are more car sharing providers in Warsaw, those three mentioned are major players. I agree that cars offered are not that fancy, however BMWs offered by 4Mobility are good option if you want to play around with RWD without worrying about fuel consumption and tires :)
Wojtek Kania said…
I have never used any car sharing service, but I really like the idea of car sharing. I don't like any 'eco' ideas and fight against global warming, but I think car sharing will reduce the production of fumes. Users of car sharing service do not have to worry about car service. Well I wouldn't replacing my own car with using car sharing services.
Unknown said…
I agree that it would be too expensive to treat car sharing as replacement for public transport. It works best as a complement to public transport. In case of Kiev, where public transport quality is poor, there seem to be no other way than buying own car.
Magdalena Popek said…
I've never used any car sharing service. This is a great idea when you need a car once in a while for moving within a city. The great con is you don't have to pay for insurance or repair. The problem begins when you want to, for example, go on holidays. I woudn't replace my own car with rented one. I can use my car whenever I want and do not have to worry if it's available or not.
It all depends where you live. If you live in a big city like Warsaw with let's say >decent< public transport most of the time, then you REALLY don't need a car at all. I mean, I wanted to apply for car license back when I was 16, but then I realized that I just don't need a car in the first place. I still feel like I should apply for that license sooner or later, but I find absolutely no need. Whereever I want to go, there is usually a very good way to get there with public transport, and much cheaper too than not only buying but maintaining your own car in the first place.

So yes, car sharing is probably a good way to cut a little of those costs. At the same time I can't imagine this solution to people that live in less developed regions where car is a must - for example in smaller village.
Unknown said…
I didn't use such car sharing service yet but my friends have and it sounds very convenient. Most of the time there's always such car not far away when you need it, just walk up, open the app and off you go. You can leave it not worrying about paying for car park etc. Hop in, hop out. Still, I wouldn't replace having my own car with such services I depend too much on a car some days. Very interesting option nevertheless.
I have never tried any car sharing services but i see the advantages of it. Every time you can rent a different car and try it out and you can leave it whenever you want. However, i think it's way too much expensive for a common people. In my opinion car sharing services will never replace having your own car. It's all because human nature. People like to own things not just rent and be forced to return them if necessary.
Zygmunt Z said…
I have never used any car sharing service but I am aware that it is getting more and more popular in Warsaw. You can see that there are more and more colorful cars with services' logos on the streets of Warsaw. I think that the most obvious advantage of car sharing is the ability to grab and get into one anytime you want. It helps you deal with any urgent situations you may have to solve - just find a nearby parked car and go whereever you have to go. It also helps you when your private car is currently unavailable - whether it is at mechanics or someone from your family took it because he/she needed it very much. I don't think that I would consider switching from my car to car sharing service, I don't think it is the main purpose of it. First of all I am very attached to my car and secondly I think that if I were to use a car from sharing service as much as I use my own I think I would have to pay way more
Unknown said…
Yeah, I’ve used Panek before. It’s just great to have an option to just “borrow” a car for some time when you need it. I don’t see much of a reason to own a car while living in a city. For everyday commuting, public transport is just good enough and for the rare occasion that I’d need to transport something bigger or go to a place where public transport doesn’t make it easy I could just use one of the car sharing services.
For me having my own car is still more efficent and cheaper than lendning them. But sometimes I am lending a car when I need to leave it in a place of destination. Long term lending is a good thing for a person that wants to have a new car all the time - few of my friends are using this option and are quite happy about it.
Unknown said…
Thank you for your opinion, I like your idea of using car sharing as a replacement for your own car when it is under repair. This scenario shows that even if you have your own car and don't plan to use car sharing services, it is reasonable to be a registered user of such a service to be able to use shared car in an emergency case.
Unknown said…
Thanks for commenting on my article, I think this is one of the biggest disadvantages of car sharing model - you can never be sure if you will be able to rent a car when you really need one.
Unknown said…
I've never used it, because I got my car earlier than this has become popular.
As for advantages of sharing a car I think I can come up with two - you can leave it anywhere, and you can drive it like a company car (You know which car does 100kph on 1st gear and can ride across 30cm curb? The company one ;D).
I wouldn't replace my own car with a shared one, to me, it's private space, while shared cars are like buses, except for no stinking hobos and boozers. Besides, connect that to the 2nd advantage (grinding it on every gear), you can get yourself a nasty surprise, when you loose a gearbox on some intersection.
Patryk Pohnke said…
Yes I used to drive a lot with Traficar cause it was part of my job as I were working in a car renting company, which Traficar belonged to.
It can be very cheap. The amount paid for ride is a combination of distance travelled and time spent doing that. So the best conditions to use such services are weekends and evenings. Using carsharing is far cheaper than your own car, it is considerable cheaper than taxi and it is as cheap(or even slightly more) than public transport. There were rides, where I paid something like 2,5 zł for 2 or 3 kilometres of ride.
I would, but I can't since I'm travelling to my home town a lot which is 400 km from Warsaw. That is the only thing that prevent me from selling my own car.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?