The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust. The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog. What is smog? Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr
Comments
Interesting test, I'm SLE , really about me :)
I think It's psychology :) This test has questions from examples from life everyone. After pass this test, you can see psychology picture of yourself
i took a test,and i'm ESE and i don't agree with that. Even the fact, that i answered honestly, gives controversial result.
If i said that it is a tale, you would try to convince me, but i hope, that there is a small percentage of truth exists.
To conclude, i would say, that there are a huge amount of test like this and every 2nd will show different results.
I have taken the test and the result was ESFJ and ESFP (with equal number of points). I have never thought about myself as a bonvivant politician but who knows? I need to go home and rethink my life :)
There is a profound dispute about whether psychology and sociology can be considered science. I do not know enough about socionics' models, assumptions behind them and the statistics involved to comment on it.
I have passed the test and got directly the same answer and result that I am getting from other social tests. I think passing this kind of test is useless.
Personally I can`t call this a science, for me it is more like a tale, well written tale, because a lot of people who passed such test trust in it result.
I have heard about socionics but in fact I don’t use it for my dayli life so don’t remember it very well.
I feel rather like extravert human but now I start to think about it and I see that if it comes to my whole life I see certain way of my life where I’m like introvert.
For me it’s sure that socionics it’s a science. I see that it’s true but maybe I can’t use it in my life.
I'm ISFP and INFP. INFP more but I have something in common with ISFP.
I don't know it is a science or a tale... Many people says that it really describes them so maybe it is a science?
The result said that I'm ESFJ and that can be truth. Questions were really life-affecting.
For me, socionics can be a science.
https://www.16personalities.com/
as the one from the article, well.. It "reeks of quality", especially the textarea with question xD.
Turned out I'm ISTP/ESTJ type, which seem to correspond to some part of my personality. One part was especially true- living "now". I hate setting distant goals and when someone tells me about "bright distant future" (i.e. the famous "dis paper wil giv u 15k/month netto, even without job experience", if you know what I mean >;D) and I'm much more focused on doing tasks within time distance of 2 weeks, rather than one year.
Socionics might be a science, but it's more of a philosophy, that "we can categorize people based on what checkboxes they tick in a test".
My sociotype is ENTP-A - "The Debater personality type is the ultimate devil’s advocate, thriving on the process of shredding arguments and beliefs and letting the ribbons drift in the wind for all to see. ". I am not sure that I am "the debater", but there are some similarities between me and this personality. In my opinion, it's a very strange test, but overall, it's rather curious to find out results.
Personally, I don't think it's a science, on the other hand, it's also not just a tale.
2. I am extrovert, sensory, logical, rational type. I did that test many years ago and I was surprised with the results, because my opinion about myself didn’t correspond to the socionics analysis, which summarized my skills and features, giving me unexpected feedback, describing me as a person with “director’s talents”.
3. This is science, definitely. The analysis of our behavior and preferences, decisions’ motivations gained together give us total information explaining everyday behavior. This is very interesting knowledge, when you study this and try to understand it, it may be brilliant tool helping you in life and in interactions with other people, in both professional and private relationships.