Skip to main content

Week 12 [20.01-26.01.20] The future of computing technology

In 1965, a co-founder of Fairchild Semiconductor and a CEO of Intel at the time Gordon Moore published a paper in which he predicted that the number of transistors in microprocessors would double wich each passing year which in turn meant a promise of a continuous increase in performance of the CPUs. But with the time as individual elements of processors were becoming smaller, it became much harder to keep up with this speculation, and by many predictions, it would be almost impossible to achieve the increase in computing performance by the beginning of the next decade. In order to continue to make progress, silicon would have to be replaced by newer and better technology. So what the future of processing hold's for us?


The video below explores the problem and possible solutions to it.
Questions:

1. Do you think Moore's Law will stop working before the end of the decade?

2. Do you believe quantum computers can help the IT industry to circumvent this challenge?

3. Do you believe the "death" of silicon can spell the end to the fast improvements in computation performance?

Comments

1. Do you think Moore's Law will stop working before the end of the decade?

We are already slowly reaching the peak of our capabilities when it comes to the miniaturization of transistors. Therefore, I believe that the Moor's law will stop working by the end of this decade.

2. Do you believe quantum computers can help the IT industry to circumvent this challenge?

Quantum computers are a completely different technology, which is only in its infancy. However, as recent reports show, we are able to adjust current computing problems to take advantage of all the benefits of the new technology. I think it will still take some time before we can talk fully about the successor of silicon, the technology has to cut down and spread first among universities and then among ordinary people. Only then will we see the full potential we are able to achieve.

3. Do you believe the "death" of silicon can spell the end to the fast improvements in computation performance?

I think that improving performance in other technologies will not be as fast as with silicon. However, there will always be some way to optimize the calculation for a given new technology.
1. Do you think Moore's Law will stop working before the end of the decade?

As for now, we are slowly reaching the limits of our possibilities, so Moore's Law is working. As I know some works are going on to improve our possibilities and break Moore's Law, so maybe by the end of the decade, it will stop working.

2. Do you believe quantum computers can help the IT industry to circumvent this challenge?

I think yes. Even now, when the quantum computers are big and not so easy to use there are still way more powerful then the regular computers are, so with the time passes they will be more and more efficient as it was with regular computers.

3. Do you believe the "death" of silicon can spell the end to the fast improvements in computation performance?

I am not sure, I think everything is connected, so after the "death" of silicon, there will be a new material which will be used in the same way, it could be even way more efficient and better suited for its purpose than silicon.
1. It seems to me that it is possible although it will be very difficult. Current information shows that we are reaching the limit, which is confirmed by Moore's work
2. I think so, even the current test confirms this. We just have to wait for quantum computers to be available to home users.
3. It seems to me that apart from silicon we still have many possibilities thanks to which we can increase computing power but we are not yet able to use them.
Kyrylo said…
Quantum computers is mere result of progress and technology, I genuenley hope that they will push us way further into singularity, and potentially take over the world. Maybe they will realize that destroying the only planet you live on, and having for example nukes is not a wise decision.
Mehmet KONUK said…
1. Do you think Moore's Law will stop working before the end of the decade?
I think Moore's law will stop working at the end of these years. Many pieces are getting smaller.
2. Do you believe quantum computers can help the IT industry to circumvent this challenge?
I think even though it is big now, it works faster than current computers. When the first computer was huge and considering what we are using now. I'm sure it will shrink on quantum computers in the future
3. Do you believe the "death" of silicon can spell the end to the fast improvements in computation performance?
Yes, silicon is still popular because it's cheap, but in the future, stronger things like diamonds will be used instead.
Mykola Suprun said…
Not so long ago, I read an article that considered implementing programmable logic arrays to make it possible for processors to be optimized for a particular task on the hardware level when it is needed. I find it to be somewhat ironic that this technology was considered obsolete by many, but now many of the older technologies and ideas come to life again, often decades after being rejected.
Mykola Suprun said…
Just a little bit more than half a year ago, there was a very exciting publication in Nature about scientists managing to create a working prototype of the processor based on carbon nanotubes. Although it was extremely simple and only was able to generate the phrase "Hello world" on its output, which is by no means impressive, it still proves that the concept is realistic, and it is possible that carbon nanotubes are the next big thing in the industry.
Mykola Suprun said…
Considering the possibility of the future, you are presenting makes me wonder whether or not it is wise to hope that creating something that is potentially immeasurably smarter than we could ever be could lead us to the future we hope it will. I believe there is a good reason to be skeptical about whether or not the supreme intelligence will consider the world and its problems in the same way we do and will solve our problems in a way that would make us happy.
Mykola Suprun said…
Although I understand how incredibly fast technology was developing for the last century, I have a very hard time believing something as complicated and so strongly demanding for the right conditions in order to work properly as a quantum computer can ever be accessible by the average person from their home. I dare not even imagine what a big leap in almost every industry we have to achieve in order for something like that to ever be possible.
Mykola Suprun said…
After reading a little bit about diamond-based CPU, it seems to me that they not only can be faster but also promise to be much more energy-efficient than their silicon-based counterparts. Apparently, it is the kind of technology one would really want to have it inside his or her portable devices. How good could it be only to have to charge your smartphone or a laptop once per week or two?

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?