Skip to main content

Week 12 [20.01-26.01.20] An argument which created Lamborghini’s first supercar.



There are not many people nowadays who wouldn’t recognize a beautiful golden bull on a black shield.
This magnificent raging taurus became a symbol of speed, wildness and luxury – everything
that Lamborghini is known for.
What if I say that it might have never been that way.
Would you believe that such a huge company wouldn’t be what it is now if one silly argument
hadn't happen?
Some people might not know that the same name and the same bull appears not only on the
hoods of some of the world’s fastest supercars but also on… tractors.
Those people might also be surprised that Ferruccio Lamborghini (the company’s founder)
had been making tractors for many years before their first sports car left the factory.


While he was serving with the Air Force mechanics corps during WWII,
he became well known for his engineering skills among his colleagues.
After the war Ferruccio decided to keep his mechanic career going so he opened a small repair shop.
Later he came up with an idea to buy and make use of military machines by turning them into tractors.
This might have had something to do with the fact that Lamborghini’s family
had a long history of farming.
His business turned out to be a huge success, which allowed him to expand and make a fortune.
As every wealthy man, Ferruccio loved spending his money on cars.
Of course Lamborghini was a very aware client so he knew when something
could have been done better when it comes to mechanics.
One of the cars which he bought and disappointed Ferruccio the most was Ferrari 250 GT.


The car’s roughness, loudness and constant problems with a clutch kept on irritating him.
Ferruccio was so frustrated that he decided to address his feelings straight to the man responsible
for all this - Enzo Ferrari. Lamborghini hoped that his opinion would be considered
helpful and would cause some sort of improvement in Ferrari’s quality.
He couldn’t have been more wrong. Enzo said that he didn't need any advice from a tractor mechanic
who had no idea what he was talking about and “the problem is not with the car but with driver!”.


Thanks to his wealth and skills Lamborghini was able to start the development of his own sports car
which had only one purpose - to show Ferrari that he could do it better.
He managed to assemble a team made of former Ferrari employees,
whose task was to make a Gran Turismo car powered by a V12 engine
which would be able to reach 250 km/h on the Autostrada del Sole.
The development began in 1962 and in May 1963 Automobilli Ferruccio Lamborghini was founded.


Lamborghini’s first supercar - 350 GT - was presented to the public in 1964
and it managed to fulfill every task it was supposed to accomplish.
It reached 250 km/h on a motorway but most importantly it made Enzo Ferrari furious. 


Questions:

1. Which other two companies come to your mind when you think of such rivalry?
2. Do you think that Ferrari as a company would be where it is now if there
wasn’t any competition from Lamborghini?
3. Have you ever been treated as if you were incompetent despite knowing the subject very well?


Sources:

Comments

Olga Przytula said…
1. I think a good example would be Apple and Windows. They are known for being main competitors to the throne of computer and IT industry. Probably that rivalry was much more intense while Steve Jobs lived, as he was probably one of the most recognizable Apple co founders, but I think this conflict is still current.

2. Oh, I think it's hard to tell, but I would say that rivalry usually boosts our will to work and create something important and impressive. Of course there are people, that prefer to back out when facing an opponent, but if you are an owner and founder of a specific company you are willing to fight to be the best and show everyone what you are capable of. So I would say .. yes, thanks to this competition they are where they are.

3. Yes, I have. People often think that if you are an animator (or artist in general I guess) you just have to “move stuff” and they tend to ignore your suggestions. I had this situation few days ago when we had to tell the client that from now on, any change would cost him double the price. That’s because they asked us to implement changes that we have suggested at the beginning of the project, which they chose to ignore. It took us 16 hours to do something, that could take around 2h if theyonly had listened.
I feel your pain. Everytime I hear that there are few "small, final changes" which shouldn't take "much of my time" my bloods seems to start boiling. How long do we have to wait for people to realise that creative work is not only about clicking buttons and having a half an hour long animation done in five minutes.
Bartosz Waś said…
1. First and obwious thing that comes to my mind is the rivarly between Microsoft and Apple.

2. I don't thing so. Rivarly is something that boosts development. When there are no competitors on the market and a company has a monopoly they dont have to try hard to get customers. When competition arrives they mus suddenly struggle and think a lot to stay on top.

3. No nothing like this ever happened to me.
1. Coca Cola and Pepsi, Boeing and Airbus. It is harder to remember if there is any company that has no competition.
2. It is not known but competition is a natural thing and sooner or later another player would probably appear on the market. If there wasn't lambo, ferrari could grow more slowly
3. Sometimes, probably because of age, people may think that I do not know a given topic. This is often the case with a mechanic when I give the car to the service, at first you can see that they will behave as if I could not know what I am talking about only after a short conversation, it turns out that I know something there.
That must mean that you are a very competent person if you have never been underestimated.
I have the same experience anytime I visit car service. That gets on my nerves each time.
1. I think of Audi and BMW that have always competed when it comes to the sports sedan segment.
2. I think so because the cars of both manufacturers have a sportiness but a completely different character.
3. Luck has never happened to me.
That's a great example. Their rivalry has been known for many, many, years.
Nike and Puma. Created by two brothers after they split up.

I don't think so.

No, it never happened to me.
1. It's not so much competition, but the big rivalry was between subaru event and mitsubishi lancer evo.
2. Certainly, competition is always beneficial for growth, without competition they would not have developed so quickly.
3. It often happened when I was a kayaking instructor at the age of 16.
1. There are a lot of examples. The first one which come to my mind is Apple and Microsoft, Intel and AMD, Uber and Bolt. There are plenty of companies which is a good example, but in my opinion it is good, because the competition makes them raise faster.

2. It is hard to say, but propably no. It was a good move, good competition is a positive. There are a lot of advantages. As I wrote before, you are growing faster because you have to be better than the others.

3. Not really, If I know the topic very well it is hard to make it look unprofessional. What is more if you have a good "talk" it is easier to looks like professional even if you do not know much.
Paweł Hadacz said…
1. Which other two companies come to your mind when you think of such rivalry?
I think a good example can be DC rivalry with Marvel. Both companies publish comics about superheroes and fight for popularity among fans.

2. Do you think that Ferrari as a company would be where it is now if there
wasn’t any competition from Lamborghini?
I believe that competition brings positive results because it forces continuous development.


3. Have you ever been treated as if you were incompetent despite knowing the subject very well?
This has never happened to me.
From what I remember those brothers created Adidas and Puma, but I get your point.
I can only imagine how people reacted when a teenager was trying to Reach them something.
Sometimes being professional or unprofessional is not the case. People tend to like making others feel incompetent even when they know nothing.
DC and Marvel is a great example, but nowadays their position is not that equal as it used to be.
1. The first thing that came to my mind was Sony and Microsoft. Their eternal struggle for players has been going on for a long time and I'm curious who will finally win it. Many of the technologies that can be used for the console are still being developed so we can soon witness very interesting events.
2. The rivalry and competition on the market are the factors that make the companies grow dynamically. So, my answer is: definitely yes. If Lamborghini hadn’t had new ideas, Ferrari wouldn’t have developed to its current state.
3. I often face such situations in car repair garage and during overhaul. The employees often look down on me, especially when I'm not familiar with the subject.
Microsoft vs Sony fight might have it's defining moment due to their new consoles on the way.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?