Skip to main content

Week 12 [16.01-22.01] DARPA Has Huge Things Planned in Biotech


BIG BUDGET = BIG BREAKTHROUGHS
Although originally established 50 years ago, to spearhead military research and development, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has been the creative force behind many things civilians now take for granted, such as the internet and GPS, and for the past three years, DARPA has been busy working on other types of projects that could also have major repercussions beyond the battlefield.

Fot1. https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Luke-Arms-DARPA-1200x800.jpg

In April 2014, DARPA established the Biological Technologies Office (BTO) with a mission to “harness the power of biological systems” to help design defense technology. Although the agency was already involved in research at the intersection of biology and engineering, with the establishment of the BTO, DARPA’s biological work found a dedicated home.
With a budget of about $296 million last year, researchers at the BTO have been doing work in areas such as memory improvement, human-machine symbiosis, and how to speed up disease detection and response. In a recent interview with Scientific American, BTO chief Justin Sanchez said he hopes to see the fruits of the office’s labor soon and shared details on what we can expect for 2017.


BIOTECH ON THE HORIZON

Fot2. http://marketexclusive.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/shutterstock_160259612_2.jpg

One project, Living Foundries, aims to develop programmable microbes. Essentially, the goal is to be able to program microbes in bacteria and yeast to produce compounds needed to develop medications on the fly. “That program set out to produce 1,000 new molecules throughout the duration of the program [which has three years left], and the teams are well on their way,” said Sanchez. “I believe they have produced close to 100 new compounds already using these new pathways.”

Still other projects are on their way for 2017, including ones focused on what Sanchez calls “Outpacing Infectious Disease,” which has been pioneering new work in DNA and RNA approaches to immunization. “The idea is that you can tell your cells that produce antibodies what the right code is for producing the antibodies that would be effective against a pathogen,” Sanchez explained. It’s something DARPA hopes to make important announcements on this year.

Fot 3. https://i0.wp.com/cdn.makezine.com/uploads/2014/05/arm.jpg
Then there are the Luke prosthetic arms with the obviously “Star Wars”-inspired name. Recently, DARPA delivered the first two commercially available Luke’s to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. This project sets the foundation for developing a “wide variety of devices that can be controlled via neural activity,” says Sanchez. Specifically, the BTO is exploring cognitive assistance.

What do you think about the future of Bioweapons?
Do you think that development of biological warfare will benefit civil areas and live of common folk?

Resources:



Comments

Ihor Ahnianikov said…
I hope that these technologies will help regular people (like Internet and GPS), modifying soldiers biologically doesn't seem like a good idea, why would you modify a complex human organism instead of creating robots from scratch? Then wars may look like "who has a huge amount of robots wins", like it is now with nuclear missiles.
I believe that it will bring benefit to regular people.
Biotechnology is a field which may our lives much easier but also can have some unexpected negative effects.
I hope that this inventions will bring only the positive effects.
Unknown said…
Well world, rolls as it used to do, everything is in perfect order. From the beggining of time military finds use for some science based phenomenon, some years later it is depraceted, so it is introducet on public market. Lets hope we will see those technologies soon, because, as experience shows some open minded civilians might make much better use of such things than army.
Maybe in some day biotech can save the daily life of many people who lost body parts in the unfortunate cases but I'm afraid it does not happen too fast. Personally, I do not see the use of this technology during the armed conflict because of the huge cost of each bio-technic soldier.
Unknown said…
As a girl I have never thought of such things, but it reminds of those sci-fi films, where the new technologies go out of control. I am not sure that we will ever have the full information about what is going on in those laboratories and it scares me a little. I just want to see the peace on Earth and not to talk about wars and army.
Adam Nowak said…
As usual, war is the key to progress. A lot of new inventions are made because of human will to murder. DARPA's projects will have a positive impact on everyday life, assuming their work won't be used in a possible future war. Who knows what are they doing? If it is something like "doom machine" from "dr. Strangelove", then i'm afraid.
Unknown said…
It seems to me that the first biotechnology great inventions will find its place in ordinary life of ordinary people. In the army, will only be machines controlled by humans, for now and in the neat future. This topic is very interesting and forward-looking and biotechnology, which will change our lives in future. Thanks to the development of this science many diseases and disability will be defeated and it will improve the overall quality of our lives and we will even live much longer. I am very impresed with all of this.
kondrat said…
If you havent- check out DARPA's military robots- they're awesome!
Bartosz Łyżwa said…
Personally I think that those projects can help us(as usual people) in many ways like arm or leg prostheses end even more. I have no many informations about DARPA's researches but I've heard about electric eye retinas that provide seeing in few colors for blind people. It's one of the best invention in my opinion.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and naturally.

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?