Skip to main content

Week 9 (18.05-24.05) Would you appreciate being fooled, offended or scared so that other people can laugh?

Let’s talk about some of the prank videos we can see on websites like Youtube.
A prank video is a video which is a practical joke people make on another person or a group of people. This type of video is very popular and while many of them are really funny, some of them may be harmful in more than one way. Not all practical jokes are dangerous, but in this presentation I will focus on those that in my opinion are.

Some pranks are staged but even if they are someone may want to imitate it and then things may go terribly wrong.
I am also not saying that the videos are not funny, I’m just pointing out the side effects of such jokes.

What harm could come from an innocent practical joke? 
It depends on what kind of joke it is.

1. Scary jokes

Many people find it funny to watch other people run away or scream in terror because of things that aren’t really dangerous. The thing is that the pranked people don’t know that they are being pranked. Fear can block your reasoning and make you miss some details that make it clear that the danger is fake. People can have heart attacks, injure themselves while running or faint or have trauma for the rest of their lives.

Here we can see a very popular video made by a Polish prankster. Looks funny, but I really hope that none of those people had arachnophobia.


In this video people go through something like a horror movie, but in real life. No physical harm is done, but some of them may be afraid to use an elevator for a very long time.


Someone could break a leg while trying to escape this fake gorilla.

2. Practical jokes that trick other people into believing that the victim did something bad

A lot of things may go wrong here. You can damage a relationship between two people very easily.

Here we can see women tricked into thinking that their partners cheated on them in the dressing room. As far as I know, the women were told afterwards that it was just a joke but it doesn’t just void what happened in their heads during those moments when they didn’t know that. From my own experience I can tell you that if someone has been hurt before in a relationship and then someone tricks them into truly believing, even for a brief moment, that their current partner is doing the same thing by presenting some fake evidence, then it can bring some doubts in the future and it’s hard to forget the feeling of being hurt by a loved one.

3. Dangerous things

Some pranks do not directly harm anyone but are just dangerous for the performers or people that may try to imitate them. Just watch the video and think of what may happen if a young person sees a video like this and then tries to impress other kids by doing the same. I know that even crazier things happen in some movies or television shows, but then it’s clearly said there that it’s performed by actors and that people shouldn’t try it at home.


Comments

I completely understand people who are looking for a new way to exist in the virtual world. Some people are taking pictures, we have to deal with the endless variety of so-called fashion bloggers, aspiring singers and many others that are looking for a way to appear in front of large group of audience. Just as there are comedians or cabarets during political debates, so there are others trying to shock people by recording. If a person appearing on the recordings will be rewarded with cash and in writing confirms allow the use of their image for such purposes I do not see anything wrong in this, but I do not think that any of the listed examples was recorded in this way.
Unknown said…
First of all majority of the pranks are not real. Situations are staged and people shown in the videos are actors. You can often say by the camera angles. You need someone's permission to show their face in the video but even when they blur them out you can't be sure if the situations are real. And even if some of them are real and you see someone's face, it means that they are ok with it. Think about it, people could die of a heart attack or harm themselves or someone "pranking" them, so the best pranks are simply set up. And even if people don't know what they are up for, they know something is going to happen and they have to sign an agreement that they won't sue for any harm done.

There are also thousands of youtube channels with guys kiss supposedly "random" girls on the street. There are a lot of guys that do it more "subtly" than this one but it is just unbelievable that if you look at the comments or write "prankinvasion" into google, people are asking how is getting so many girls...seriously... - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCCWLKcCWXA

As for the last prank you posted (I'm not really a fan of Wardęga because I find US pranksters to be better and he often uses ideas I've seen before) he had a suit like stuntman in movies do and I'm sure they practiced it before. Here is a music video where they used a similar technique, unfortunately I didn't find a making of, that I once saw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px_3MerNhgQ

Anyway I've seen some far "worse" pranks. Here are some examples:

Probably everybody saw this one, "the zombie train" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D00GbdbSfc

Another zombie one, not that scary but it looks cool. I think Wardega used the same guy in one of his videos - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFMsqrG9RWg

And a really boorish one, bleh - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ9Tafx-x-w

There was a popular couple that used to prank themselves, I also not convinced that the pranks are real but they had some quite funny ideas - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWKDYMShIew
I really hope most of the pranks are recorded in a way that Paulina described, using actors. I often see fragments of prank compilation shows in TV and sometimes I'm really disgusted by them.

It's not that I'm against all pranks, but if you want to do something funny in public, do it in a way that doesn't threat or offend anyone. And I mean, anyone. Just think - you don't know everything about every stranger. What if a person has a weak heart and scaring him can cause him to have an attack? What if a person has a phobia over particular thing and you'll cause trauma? And even if person is 100% healthy and mentally stable, it's still not a reason to do anything that can hurt his feelings, offend them or make any harm.

I can't remember the name of the guy, but I've seen a particularly stupid so-called pranks he made by destroying various items in shops (maybe you remember this guy, he was quite popular some time ago) - spilling milk, crashing TVs etc.

The pranks I like the most are the ones that cause laugh not only in viewers, but also in the people 'pranked'. You can do a lot of funny things without mocking anyone.
rf. said…
Well, do you know that Wardęga is simply copycatting Remi (Remi Gaillard)? I mean, it's nice to have our national YouTube comedian but some pranks are simply one to one adaptations of something already done...
I mostly agree with you, but consider one thing: Would you be happy if someone scared you or someone from your family like in the elevator and then gave you let's say 20 dollars? Wouldn't you feel like hitting him or something? I think that many people would pass on the money just to be spared the scary part, but if they are asked when the prank is already done then it's too late.
First of all I agree with you about many pranks being scripted, but not all of them are. Also, pranksters (both professional and amateur) often copy popular prankster's pranks, one of them may do it without script and actors.
About needing permission for showing somebody's face - That's true IN POLAND, I haven't studied law in Brazil and other countries, but I wouldn't be so sure that it is the case everywhere.
Besides, the face is not the only thing you can recognise a person by. You can do it just seeing their body and hearing their voice. If someone pranked you and then you were recognised by a colleague or family even with blurred face, wouldn't you be embarrassed just the same?
About the last video - I'm afraid you missed my point there. Wardęga was prepared for the video, that's true. I know that he has been hurt on one of his videos, I'm not sure if it wasn't the accident on this one, but it doesn't matter. A young viewer doesn't necessarily know that it was all professionally done, he or she may think that it's a good idea to try to do something similar to impress the others - except that the kid won't have the professional equipment necessary to survive it. I'm not saying that the pranksters are bad people, I just think that sometimes they should think about the possible consequences of their public actions.
Many pranks are recorded the way Paulina described, but not all of them. Sometimes a person just wants to be popular and does something like offending or scaring random people. They appear that 'It's a prank.' is explanation enough and voids the harm done. Unfortunately people like to watch it.
Not all of his pranks are copied from Remi. Besides, if you look at television or music industry you can see that people copy each others work all the time, that's normal. If the performer copies a thing wisely and adds some value from himself to the performance then I think it's ok. What do you think?
MartaSB said…
I'm not a big fan of pranks, doesn't matter whether they are primitive like these in public television or more sophisticated like these made by Remi or Wardęga. I have seen maybe one or two that were ok, it's just not my thing. For sure they shouldn't be offensive but how can you tell how a person will react and which joke is appropriate? It's very subjective.
Unknown said…
It just didn't occur to me that someone might be stupid enough to set themselves on fire and copy that prank.
I think that's the point - if you're not sure how a person will react, don't do it. It's way better to assume they can be offended than the other way round.
Someone can be young... or drunk... and trying to impress others. Many things seem too stupid to be done but there are people who do those things anyway.
Exactly, unfortunately there are also pranksters who deliberately offend people in order to make them get very angry and yell because it's "so funny"... Well, in some cases it is, but is it worth it?
Unknown said…
I'm a big fan of those kind of pranks. I am following many channels on youtube posting such regularly. Although the main idea was very unique, with time those pranks started getting more and more similar, though now they are not so much fun for me as they were initially.

I have seen all the videos that you presented here, before.

Some of the pranks I have found funny, but I sometimes do encounter stupid or dangerous ones.
I wouldn't enjoyed being pranked even after the fact. I generally don't like watching pranks because 99% of them are totally lame and staged. If I were pranked, I would sue the prankster for foolishness : P. RBK said above that "it's a prank" is the explanation for everything, it reminden me of scene in Chappie where Hugh Jackman uses the same explanation.
Unknown said…
I kinda like this kind of pranks. Unfortunately, there are not many great, creative pranksters in the Internet. Most of them are just copycats, or people who just want to gain popularity by humiliating other people. I don't think a good prank could cause any harm, it should be funny not only to prankster but also for the pranked person. It's important to know the boundary where joke ends.
I love prank with elevator. Personally I like watch this video but I don't like to be part of it. I know two videos Mortal Combat and lift :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W8hsVvyKt4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W8hsVvyKt4
Unknown said…
I like SA Wardega because of his engagement in helping animals. He created a CarDog, a van that looks like a big, fluffy dog. I guess his inspiration was car from Dumb and Dumber movie. CarDog drives around Poland and helps animals in need. In the video Wardega is dressed up as a big Disney’s Pluto and feeds animals and walks dogs. Video is very touching and it is impossible to not cry at the end of it. Additionally, he gave all earnings from this clip to help animals in the shelters. For me he is a role model because he makes use of his fame to help others.
You can watch this video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaKRodc6DCY
I do not know other pranksters because I watch YouTube movies very rarely.

rf. said…
I think you're right :)
IzabelaSzumen said…
Ok, I'm not really a fan of this Internet trend, but the ideas are sometimes beautiful. I'm not talking about movies where frightens people are running around but I am a great admirer of anonymous urban jokes. I do them myself sometimes, like preparing dinner on a fully set table among the bushes in the park and wait in hiding to see who sits and how he will behave, or fulfilling elevators with balloons filled with helium for my neighbor from building who is old and sad. I hope that this kind of activities can start be popular because of those movies too. I recommend you to do some this summer :)
Unknown said…
I wouldn't want to be a target of such pranks, but I know most of them are staged so the chance that this will happen is very slim. Fortunately. :D Besides that I think this kind of tricks aren't really my kind of thing, I have a different sense of humour and such jokes rarely entertain me. Some are funny I agree, but most of them are plain stupid.

I also agree with what Patrycja mentioned in her comment. You should be careful who you're going to surprise because you may unwillingly offend or harm them. But as I mentioned above, most of these are staged, so the actors know what they are doing.
Do you really think that someone would?:P
I heard about him but actually I didn't know about alle the charitiy he does, now I have different perspective. Thans for sharing
Unknown said…
Practical jokes are the best if they don’t go to far. There are plenty of dumb pranks which I don’t like e.g. those with a crime pretending.
I don’t know if that really took place but this is a kind of joke that I really enjoy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbppTv4pCGQ
Unknown said…

Those videos are really funny but in fact making most of them must have really hurt. Wardenga has a problem with the law because some of people shown in the video were hurt. Here is an example of really terrifying jokes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xSNiPx791A I wouldn’t totally want to be in their skin. This is so creepy and scary. When you watch this you can find this jokes a really fun but being in this person shoes can be really scary ! Those people who are making this are totally well prepare but the others are not.
Unknown said…
Personally, I think such pranks may be amusing to watch but I wouldn't like to be taken in in such a situation. What's more,some people may be more vulnerable to such unexpected and somehow stressful situations, which may result in some trauma or even a heart attack.
Unknown said…
Paulina, what a long comment! I choose to believe in all these videos, it doesn't change my life if they turn out to be fake, but I laugh harder if I think that they are real.
Unknown said…
I think that prank should be funny not dangerous. It is easy to make one's flesh creep but on my opinion prank relies on play, laughter. It should give people smile and fun. Terror can be dangerous even for our health. I like "verbal jokes"
Unknown said…
I always don't know what to think about such pranks. I laugh from every and each of SA Wardega films/pranks but I'm not exactly sure If I would like to be part of them. Some could be quite scary, the one with spider-dog for example. It was perfectly prepared with all those webs and body parts. If it happened to me I probably would be as scared as all the people pictured in this film.
Unknown said…
I often wonder who would publish an embarassing video of themselves online. There are thousands of clips of people who accidentally put themselves on fire when dancing or something and I always try to figure out why they would publish them. I am aware that some of them are fakes and some of them are published unwillingly by someone else (people often don't know that it is illegal to publish their images online without their consent).
These clips make me laugh, but it is curious that people build up this barrier and they distance themselves from any empathy. Why feel for some poor guy that may have hurt himself when we could laugh at him? It is somewhat cruel how insensitive and indifferent Internet makes us.
I would never let any embarassing clip or picture of me be published online and recently I more than ever think about these poor people that were scared to pee themselves or something.
A whole different thing is laughing at people whose stupidity is the reason of bad things that happened to them - for example a boy that jumps on a threadmill at a full speed, falls from it and looses his flip flops. I don't feel bad for them and I don't feel even tiny bit guilty for laughing at them.
Unknown said…
My favourite "professional'" prankster is Remi Gaillard. His pranks are usually "safe'" - the first prank in 2002 was taking part in the winners' celebrations in the Coupe de France. He still avoids pranks that can potentially cause harm to the public.
There are some young prankers, who wants to become king of youtube by making pranks that are dangerous, some of them waste the resources of emergency or police services. For me, the worst are "Baby kidnapping prank'" and "Drive-by Shooting Prank". It is just dangerous, reckless and stupid!
Jakub M said…
I have already seen most of videos mentioned both in your presentation and in comments and I’m shocked that no one have seen (or remembered) about this series – to be honest – one of my favourite ones. DmPranksProductions, in my opinion, are preparing the craziest and most horrifying pranks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHjGtBnSv50 or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FztNNH9_vI. They’re already famous for their “Killer Clown” and “Flamethrower Psycho”. Of course I wouldn’t like to be one of those victims, but lately I’ve been to “Horrorhouse” on the Old Town and I must say I enjoyed. Of course I went there willingly and I was aware it’s an act, but it was so good that when you see a man with a working chainsaw running after you, you do not think much.

There was a famous accident as well, when car driver was so afraid of the prankster that he hit another car, which was behind him. I don’t know how did it ended, but I’m sure that both vehicle owners weren’t having fun.
Vitaly – guy running naked during last Football World Cup – is also very well-known for his pranks:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFMsqrG9RWg . Some of them are scary, some are just funny, but I enjoy his style as well.

Some pranks, on the other hand, can go really wrong:
http://nypost.com/2013/09/08/teen-girl-shot-and-killed-in-tragic-prank-gone-wrong/
Unknown said…
Personally I like sometimes to see the "jokes" of these "YouTubers". Sometimes it is interesting to see what people come up with. Are these jokes funny? Sometimes. There must create a lot of boring movies with "jokes" that one was successful. I not ever wondered that scaring random people or taking them jokes it is good or bad. w I would not want to be a hero this type of film.
Unknown said…
I think that it is a big pity that those pranks are not conducted in the US areas where firearms could be used - less of those guys are on the streets better for the internet and for people. I don't find those jokes original, interesting or even funny, instead I think those guys should be treated as criminals and be brought to the law or at least beaten up - 35 IQ level and 50$ camera in the hands are not a reason to bother other people with childish jokes.
Yep, I wouldn't like that happening to me either.
I agree with you. About Chappie... I haven't seen it yet, no spoilers! ;)
I'm pretty distanced to myself and also don't have a problem with laughing at myslef.
If all is in good fun and nobody gets hurt I don't have anything against such pranks even if they are made on me.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?