Skip to main content

Week 13 (19.01-25.01.15) How recording changed music


How recording changed music



Imagine the world with no vinyl records, cd's, mp3 players, streaming music etc.. For most of us, living that world would be tough. We got accustomed to broad availabily of music. While we all know that it wasn't always like this, I think there's something interesting about how the possibility of recording music changed the musical world.

In 1906 a music composer John Philip Sousa said that technology would eventually destroy music. He is known for saying „These talking machines are going to ruin the artistic development of music in this country. When I was a boy in front of every house in the summer evening you would find young people together singing the songs of the day or the old songs. Today you hear these infernal machines going night and day. We will not have a vocal cord left”. He's apocalyptic predictions may sound funny these days, but rapid development of technology definitely changed how people perceive and play music. Nowadays we hear music on almost every corner, but almost none of it is „live”.

Thomas Edison and his phonograph


One of the most positive and obvious outcomes is availability. As audio technology developed since Edisons invention of phonograph, music has become more and more available. Now, with mobile internet access, we can play instantly almost every song we know. With streaming services like Spotify or Deezer, people around the world can get most of them with decent quality. You might say that Beethoven's dream of great music being available to masses ironically has come true.

Mentioned availability also works well for performers – there's a lot of musicians, for whom the internet has created the opportunity of publishing music and selling it (and some of them earn a lot more that way).

The development of technology has also drastically changed the way people perform music. As far as I know, since the invention of electric guitar, people keep complaining about music being „dehumanized”, sounds of instruments losing their souls etc. Thanks to inventions of second half of recent century, music has become easier to compose and easier to perform. Pro Tools and Autotune are used to re-adjust not only out of tune singing but also sound of instruments. On the other hand, performers now can re-listen music they produce and hear their own mistakes.

Personally, I don’t feel that technology „spoiled” the music. Nor I think that it will eventually make people abandon concert halls. There's something about live performances, about „being the part of the music”, which cannot be recorded.


Questions:

What do you think about how technology changed the music?
Do you like live performances?
Do you use any music streaming service?


Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonograph
Alex Ross, Infernal Machines, Listen to This, Picardor 2011

Comments

Unknown said…
What do you think about how technology changed the music?

I think technology playes even bigger role in music industry than ever before. Nowadays most of the celebrities such as Miley Cyrus, Katy Perry, Lady Gaga, Rihanna, Will.I.Am, Iggy Azalea, etc.. use additional software to create sounds and effects.

Do you like live performances?

I do like it but I prefer it recorded in recording studio. The quality of the sound is much better, on the other hand you cannot see the artist's live performance on stage.

Do you use any music streaming service?

I use youtube all the time. I listen to the latest trends and I enjoy modern music. Here are some links to my favourite tracks:

The Fault In Our Stars - Charli XCX - Boom Clap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOPMlIIg_38

Katy Perry - This Is How We Do (Official)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RMQksXpQSk

Ariana Grande - Break Free ft. Zedd
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8eRzOYhLuw

Taylor Swift - Shake It Off
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWlot6h_JM

Calvin Harris - Summer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebXbLfLACGM

Those are just first few examples from my list, please contant me if you want additional.
Unknown said…
I really like live music performance, although I haven't got chance to participate in many of them. I remember many of jazz/ jam sessions, organised in my home town, during high school. With group of music enthusiasts we used to spend many time on those concerts.

I'm familiar with many streaming services. For long time my favourite one was 8tracks, witch allows user to browse playlists according to tags and moods. I recently started using spotify, because of wider variety of musicians and composers. It has just better sellection of music.

I also recomned you looking at streaming service: https://www.stereodose.com . It's a little bit controversial because, user is chosing music according to presumable "high" feeling.
PrzemekM said…
For sure new technologies, are new opportunities for musicians. Nobody is perfect so some corrections are always good i think. In my opinion most of actual sounds effects won't be possible if we don't have technology, so yes technology changed music industry.
Live performances for me are very interesting. I often see that artists try to show me something new. New way singing old song what is great.
I don't use any streaming service right now.
Unknown said…
Just like Tomek I really enjoy live music performances. I often go to a jazz club in Łomianki called "Jazz cafe" (which I highly, highly recommend) where a lot of really well know musicians come to play (and not only jazz musicians) and I really love the atmosphere of a live performance and of a small cafe concert.

I don't really use streaming services apart from youtube. I just mostly download my music from torrents and listen it from my ipod or computer ;)
Unknown said…
The very significant aspect of technology in music is possibility of, let's call it, changing the nature... And we have to say it out loud - everybody can sing now. Even when your not good enough, you can still make 298374 attempts at the studio, and even when this is not enough - you can change false tones in computer program. Nowadays it is so common to go for a gig and find out that an artist is really bad "live".
This might be good or bad thing, depending on our point of view :) it might be good, because in this case almost everybody can sing or somehow do music. You don't need to be an expert anymore, have perfect ear (?), you even don't need to sing nor play an instrument. Now "musicians" are also dj, who are only finding nice music and remix it a little bit – hardly simplifying, I am a big fan of all those remixes and electronic music in general :) But really it is quite hard to compare it to virtuosos who have sacrificed all their life to be infallible and to perform alive as perfect as it is possible :)
So here comes the bad thing - we are flooded by hours of not really valuable music, that we need to weed out :) And as you said, it might somehow losing the soul, you feel way different on a gig (that is good, not one from bad ones :D ) than when you're listening a cd in your home. But in my opinion gigs are even better if you know every single song and lyrics, and you absolutely in love with them! Without recording it would be quite impossible :D

But in general - the possibility of having our beloved music with us everywhere, not only in the concert hall is absolutely amazing, I cannot imagine my life without it, really :D
MartaSB said…
The changes in techonology in regard to music are very beneficial for me as they all tend to make music more available in any situation and with even better quality.

As for live performances, I like jazz concerts a lot. I can sit at the table, sip my drink and listen to some jazz music all evening :)
I also like latino music playing live.

As for music streaming services, I don't use any.
rf. said…
How in the world could technology spoil music, if music is technology itself. From the very first instruments, up till current digital voice edition - it's all the same thing. As people discover the world, and physics that is basics for music, we can understand it all better. Famous notes are based on mathematical series and is there anything wrong with that? We used to record music in our memory and that surely made it more valuable because we were only able to remember some of the songs. I could agree that recording music would 'ruin the artistic development' but only if people would sing less. But then again we have karaoke so it's all good :)
Unknown said…
I think that most important value of technology is distributing music to every home or single person. Radio, walkman, cd players and now mp3 players. Those are but greatest inventions that most advanced population can't live without, i am damn sure can't live without music player. Also you can't forget about the internet, since it helps lots of indie composers to start somewhere and get popularity at faster rate than before.
As for live music, i really enjoy going on jazz/classical perfomances, since this music is less depended on technology and is best to hear live. Just like Paulina mentioned, i highly suggest visiting Jazz Caffee as the expierence is completely outsanding.
In case of streaming services, i must say that i've been waiting for this since i discovered some russian site, which was experimenting with such feature (later to be banned for legal reasons) I used groove shark, bandcamp and souncloud to found new and less mainstream bands or music. Now i am using Spotify because it is so much easy for me to keep track on what i am listening now, since my music tastes are vast. Other than that i am using Youtube.
Unknown said…
I think technology helped music become part of our everyday lives. It's great that I can listen to music for example when I'm in subway so I don't need to hear only the train noises or especially when I'm driving, because I don't have many options left to entertain myself.
And even music is a very common thing in our lives, there is always something magical in hearing it live.
Unknown said…
I've never heard of 8tracks before - it looks interesting . As for searching for music by tags, I always used mix of spotify and allmusic / rateyourmusic services.

Stereodose music sounds "trippy" ;p. Yes, I bet for some it might sound controversial, but on the other hand - psychedelics inspired whole generations of artists in past century.
Having a music player with good isolating headphones in public the transportation is a bless for me. I hate having to hear people's conversation or even sounds of the bus or the train.

As for the live music, I believe that there will always be people that appreciate live music more. Sometimes the reason is the imperfection of live music.
Unknown said…
According to the first part of your post, I think that it mostly depends how you evaluate work of art. You might value it by performer's / composer's skills, but as well you might value it just by your personal experience with it. Contemporary music (and probably contemporary art in general) is full of works, whose composition (and performance) does not require special skills of composers/performers. That especially applies to aleatoric music (music of "chance" or simply - pieces which composition is in some part based on randomness). Does it mean it's "bad"? That depends on the point of view :)

"We are flooded by hours of not really valuable music, that we need to weed out " - I agree, but than again - there's a lot of good music to discover, and personally - I find the process of "discovering" very entertaining :P
Unknown said…
Thanks for recommendation. I love jazz and I surely will check it. I would also recommend "Pardon, To Tu" jazz club. You can find a lot of free jazz and avant garde music there.
przemekM said…
sometimes nice to stay surprised something new from the artist
przemekM said…
Thanks to technology, we also have a lot of new music styles. Without technology wouldnt be electro!
Anonymous said…

What do you think about how technology changed the music?
It obviously changed it a lot. Electronic effects give you freedom to create any sound you like. For example let have a look at pedalboard of modern guitarist:
https://jasondeberry.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/tumblr_mgha3pq8eo1s0mxs3o1_1280.jpg
Besides that there are few programs that let you create song from nought to song with choirs, with no exterior input.

Do you like live performances?
Yes, I do. It spoils the pleasure if I know that for instance vocalist fakes singing.

Do you use any music streaming service?
None, besides YouTube.
Anonymous said…
I am not fan of this particular style but I would like to agree that electronics made music much more interesting. The first big thing in my opinion was invention of electric guitar.
Seisyll said…
What do you think about how technology changed the music?
It made music more available.

Do you like live performances?
Yes, especially when music is really loud, that way you can really feel the music.

Do you use any music streaming service?
youtube, spotify, cmd.fm, soundcloud
Unknown said…
Thanks to new technologies everyone can listen to what he wants and likes – it is enough just to press “play” on the player. I think it is very good that today everyone has access to music. We do not have to drive hundreds kilometers to listen to our favorite singer. Quite often people did not have enough funds for that, and also time. I do not use such services as Deezer or Spotify. However, I heard a lot of positive comments in respect of those services.
Thanks to the technology allowining for digital recording discovering great artist is very easy. Now I only listen to my music throught the means of digital recordings, sometimes from a file in my collection and often through online streams, which became a very popular solution for listening music.
Unknown said…
That's good point :)
On one side I like that change. Because of it music has become more available. I can discover new artist so easily. Noawadays I mainly use Spotify. It is co so convenient. I pay 20 zlotych a month and I am able to listen to music of my choice both on my laptop and on my ipod, even when I don't have the Internet access so it is rather convenient. The technology also allows those talented ones, who cannot afford to be publised by real producers. They use their laptops and record at home and then they put it to the Internet.
On the other hand it is sad that because of the technology anyone can become a singer. You don't have to have a great voice. You just have to look nice, have the image. Maybe I am exaggerating but I'm sure you know what I mean...
To be honest I really enjoy live performances, as far as the performer is a good artist. Live performances have this incredible feeling....
Tomasz so you enjoy jazz hm?;) Not my kind of thing, but I also really enjoy live performances...
Natalka you are right, it can be so disappointing. I had such situation with Florence and the Machine...Were you yourself in such situation?
Unknown said…
As for the comparison of studio and live quality of sound - often in fact studio quality is better, but in some cases, live experience of sound is (in my opinion) much better.
For example, imagine hearing this in a concert hall:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYM54vhLYTU

There are hundreds of choral singers. The effect of sitting in front of them and hearing them singing is massive. It cannot be obtained in headphones or home sound-systems.
Marcin Lyzwa said…
it's obvious technology has changed music, the way music is recorded, performed and delivered to us. Nowadays almost everybody can become a famous dj or music producer. Personally I prefer more classical music where skills are still the most important. I love live performances, but sometimes band sounds better on CD then live. Concerts have specific atmosphere, tension, and this feeling when sound bursts inside your body is awesome.
Since Spotify is available in Poland I give up downloading music from torrents, I use it all the time. Before Spotify i used to use youtube.
Unknown said…
Oh I didn't know that Florence is bad at the gigs :o But her parts are reeeaally hard, really :D Maybe its stress, I don't know :D I personally don't have any really bad experience :)

Krzysiek - I agree with you, discovering music is really cool activity :) Especially finding something brilliant :D And yes, giving some kind of freedom is giving as a result something bad and something very innovative and amazing as well :)
Unknown said…
Damn, jazz jam sessions are really good, have you ever been in Cud Nad Wisłą? They have some kind of event every year for few weeks, where they invite jazzman to perform on live, for free :) Very relaxing and entertaining, highly recommended :)
Mateusz Frycie said…
Thanks to technology we are able to get to know artist we would otherwise never have heard about. We open an Internet browser and find singers from Africa, America, Australia. We are not limited by any borders, we can easily get to know music from different countries and cultures. Though, I still have to admit that I prefer live performances. During concerts you can feel the real connection with the artist. Nevertheless, I do not attend life performances that often, so I have to settle for using youtube or spotify.
Unknown said…
Although I like tradicional music, and instrumental music- not software and sound effect music, I think that technology is good for music and it playes big role in music. Most of us don’t think about music without computer and special software.
On the other hand technology gives us access to many other artis, etc. We can listen whatever we want whenever we want.
I use youtube and spotify. I love spotify- the quality of the sounds is really good.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
In my opinion the idea of music changed a lot. At first it was all about talent, determination and lots and lots of hard work. Besides, just a few could spend their time on develloping their musical skills and many just didn't know they had any because professional musical instruments were very expensive thus financially unavailable. Nowadays all one needs is a sense of rythm and a Mac computer. Last year we attended this class, we were composing our own music using some presets. After I finished my piece, my teacher asked me if I had finished a school of music. I had not and it proves that nowadays you don't have to be a genius to create music. It bothers me that everything may be altered and it doesn't matter how poor of a singer you are - you can always be great, unless you want to sing live. This month I saw Whiplash - a movie about a drum player who wants to be the best musician in the world and works REALLY hard to pursue his dreams. It reminds me of the times when only the best were stars and the average were unpopular or quickly forgotten. Now it is just not fair. I like the idea of portable music though - you can enjoy it everywhere and you don't bother everyone around you with noise. The soundproof headphones are a great invention too.
Julia Osiak said…
What do you think about how technology changed the music?
There are the good sides and the bad sides of technology changing the music. For once it provided more tools and opened up a whole new spectrum of possibilities. There are new genres of music, new instruments and the availability to the public has increased tremendously.

Do you like live performances?
Live performances are amazing. Mostly. The feeling and the experience that you get during a live performance is completely different than what you get listening to music at home. I love going to concerts because it gives me a new perspective on the music and I can also see if the artists is really as good as I thought.

Do you use any music streaming service?
Yes, I use Spotify on daily basis but I also like to come back to old CDs or vinyls.
Unknown said…
I see recording music very positive. Vinyls and tapes have usually very nice sound.
Level low with the mp3 era. Now I thing it's going better and better.
I like live performances, you can't compare it to recorded music.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and naturally.

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?