Skip to main content

Week 9 (1-7.12.2014) Neuromarketing - hopes and doubts

    Perhaps many of you have heard about ‘Pepsi & Coke Challenge’, - the simple experiment in which there were two taste tests — one blind and one in which subjects knew which beverage was which. During the experiment researchers observed the corresponding brain activity. If volunteers were unaware of which brand’s beverage they were drinking, the fMRI showed more activation in a basic “reward centre” which is located in the prefrontal cortex. The winner was Pepsi, as it tasted better for the tester. However, when the person knew which drink was which, the winner was Coke. In this case the fMRI scans showed more brain activation in centres for memory and emotions [3]. So how is it possible that even though people prefer the taste of Pepsi, Coke dominates the market ? The answer is neuromarketing.

    Generally speaking neuromarketing is an emerging branch of neuroscience. Wikipedia defines it in more detail as ‘a new field of marketing research that studies consumers’ sensorimotor, cognitive, and affective response to marketing stimuli’ [1]. This field of study uses medical technology to determine consumer reactions to brands, slogans and advertisements. During the studies researches uses number of high-end technologies as fMRI, which measures the brain’s activity by looking at changes in blood flow, EEG, measuring brain signal using a swimming cap covered with electrodes, and also eye-tracking technology [2]. With all these devices researchers in labs can predict whether you’ll prefer McDonald’s or Burger King.


    Neuromarketing is rather expensive — single fMRI machine can cost hundreds of thousands of $, but there are many corporations that pay millions for researching this subject. Contrary to the situation in the '60s and '70s, when world renowned advertising agencies were forbidden to run ads with subliminal stimulus, today’s research results are used on a large scale by big companies, for example Google, P&G, Coca-Cola. An interesting fact to consider  is that this marketing research uses the equipment whose purpose is strictly medical, but in this case it serves as a tool for discovering the mysteries of our needs and desires. Unfortunately, these emotions are stripped and dissected in front of corporations, which do not hesitate to use them for reaching their marketing goals. Currently, sales do not come down to offering a good product. Instead it is driven by manipulation of man and his desires. A very good example how marketers works is shown in this video:


    There is also a better side of neuromarketing. As you may know, the brain is only 2% of our body mass and it burns about 20% of the energy. We still know very little about our brain, the way it works, the way we think. Thus, each test can be helpful as long as it follows the standards and review process imposed by academics [4]. We should also remember that there are many ads that do not have a commercial message, for example social campaigns for not texting while driving. In this case, thanks to neuromarketing we know that words won’t work but pictures will have a greater impact.

Do you think that discovering how our brain functions and using this knowledge is going in the right direction?
Will companies be able to manipulate our emotions with even bigger precision?
How can we protect ourselves from being targets of such marketing strategies?

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromarketing
http://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2013/02/01/neuromarketing-tapping-into-thepleasure- center-of-consumers/
http://www.marketing-schools.org/types-of-marketing/neuromarketing.html 
http://www.academia.edu/969189/Neuromarketing_The_New_Science_of_Consumer_Behavior http://www.neurosciencemarketing.com/blog/articles/google-neuromarketing.htm

Comments

Unknown said…
This footage was a little disturbing to me, I wish I haven't seen that.

I think people have made huge progress in neuromarketing and this area of development is going to always be the part of marketing that will have to go the right direction.

As far as I see the problem is not neuromarketing, but the type of treatment animals such as pigs, cows and chickens are recieving. Huge producers focus mostly on scaling their production and dont care enough about their animals, which brings a lot of attention to how can we optimise the size/capacity of the farms so that both consumers and producers could be happy? Maybe each animal should be grown on grass instead of concrete, and be able to go for daily walkarounds?

I'm not sure how to answer the second question because I don't know how to measure the effectiveness of companies' manipulation. It probably mostly depends on how reliable the information on the label and description of the product is - there are no strict laws forbidding or allowing anything.

Marketing is everywhere, you can't get away with it. You are and you will be targeted by campaigns. Honestly, I think there's no need for protection as the quality of products you recieve is percisely measured. The other thing is the quality of life those animals are getting and what can we do about it? Again, I suggest to think about farm optimisation mechanisms.
Unknown said…
We’ve made a huge progress in discovering how brain works in last years and I definitely think that we should keep on working to find out more information about brain functions and ways it reacts to different impulses. I think that companies will be able to manipulate people more because they already are doing a “great” job. We can see an example every year on Black Friday in United States when people literally walk all over others to get a few dollars discount on something and spend the whole day waiting in front of the store. I imagine that in the future we will be able to order anything we want instantly. I already saw something like that on the Warsaw underground – you could scan a QR code of a product you wanted and they would deliver it to your home. And in my opinion in the future we could be able to that via television. Imagine watching a commercial for a chocolate bar and you really feel like eating it after watching the ad, so you press a button/scan a code or whatever and somebody brings it to your home or you’ve got a tube from which it just falls out. We already try to make everything available from home, we love online shopping because it’s convenient and easy. There are already companies that will bring you stuff, for example clothes and if you don’t like them they will come and take them back. You can order food to your house. It just needs "improvement". All the websites we use gather information about what we are looking for and then show us specific ads. I think that everybody should have some common sense and just try to be an aware consumer and try not to make too many impulse purchases.

Considering farming, I personally only buy eggs that are from free ranged chicken or even from chickens called “Zielononużka kuropatwia” – you can read about it online - they can only live in very small herds and if their number gets higher than 50 they would kill each other. They also can’t live in cages so you can be sure that these chickens had to be treated well. I also try to eat less meat nowadays and I hope that people will be able to develop artificial meat that has the same nutritional values so people could stop farming animals at all.
Unknown said…
Neuromarketing is really interesting branch of marketing an psychology. The funny fact is that it is not only about our perception of the brand itself but it is also connected with many other factors. For example I have seen an neuromarketing survey that was analysing a TV commercial. The purpose was to observe how our brains are responding to things that were showed in the screen. Very interesting observation was how they react on many different things - for example women's brain responses absolutely differently when "it" sees another woman, than when a man sees exactly same scene (not really revealing tho :p ). But when we broadcast and ad we need to be conscious how the WHOLE audience responses, I mean our target which often contain both - women and men.
Unknown said…
Artificial meat ? Sound like science fi tion. As long as Im against anything artificial I hope none would ever invent artificial meat. But, yes I've heard about that first burger made not out of cow. I also ties to limit meat, mainly becouse of all chemistry and hormons inside...
Unknown said…
I was thinking more about a "perfect" solution. That the meat would be artificial but it would taste the same and it would be healthy for you and we wouldn't have to kill anything to get it. Think about being able to eat your favorite food every day like chocolate for example and it would taste great but it would be healthy like a plate of vegetables. I know that's highly unlikely to become true. But people should start thinking about producing different source of food because some day we could run out.
Unknown said…
Interesting concept... But I bet it would be carcinogenic :P
MartaSB said…
Do you think that discovering how our brain functions and using this knowledge is going in the right direction?

And what is this right direction? I'm pretty sure we can find some benefit for the military in every discovery... :)


Will companies be able to manipulate our emotions with even bigger precision?

I believe this is possible. There are many ways of affecting human brain still to be discovered.


How can we protect ourselves from being targets of such marketing strategies?

I believe we are targets of so many marketing strategies that even if we are aware of some of them and feel free from manipulation, there are some that we overlook.
rf. said…
Oh come on. Pepsi has more sugar than Coke, so it tastes better in the short run. EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT RIGHT? :)
Anyways, I'm trying to be a conscious buyer, and honestly I'm more concerned about Russian long-range missile weaponry in Crimea than that someone is going to think that he knows whether i prefer McDonald’s or Burger King.
Unknown said…
It is well known that people choose things which they have good memories, like a beverage form a dinner with their loved one. That is basic strategic to retain a customer. Here you can find some examples:
http://www.wikihow.com/Retain-Customers
The science behind it is quite complex, and I think it can bring some more knowledge how our brain works.
In my opinion sometimes it is hard to tell whether something is going in the right direction. Simply, I think that we still know too little about brain and how it exactly functions in order to tell whether the process is going the right direction. Perhaps, by accident during these tests, the scientists can discover something more interesting and revolutionary about the brain.
Unfortunately, I am afraid that in order to get more information about brain we have to let big companies continue their work even if it means that they can use this knowledge.
Cola is better for me :) I was interested in marketing a little, some times ago. This is a very broad field. In general marketing based on various studies and tests. Each product in the supermarket has its specific place. Monitoring and IT systems observe consumer behavior for example in shop. All behaviors are analyzed. Companies pay to have the best place for their products - in front of the human eyes. I'm think that discovering human brain is going in probably right direction. Everything needs to develop, to move forward. I only hope that the companies will never know better than me my needs.
Anonymous said…
Do you think that discovering how our brain functions and using this knowledge is going in the right direction?
It doesn't matter, any knowledge will be used in a good and a bad way, but it shouldn't stop us from learning.

Will companies be able to manipulate our emotions with even bigger precision?
As far as I know the people as a whole get better in [insert here whatever you want] every year.

How can we protect ourselves from being targets of such marketing strategies?
As usual, just don't watch TV, don't believe advertisments, install Adblock and again don't believe everything you read on the forum.
Unknown said…
This video left me speechless. I agree with this lady that our ignorance is the secret weapon of marketing. It is so sad that many people are so busy with their own lives that do not want to see world’s problems around them. I always try to buy meat from ecological farms. I think it is time to start respecting animals.
Neuromarketing seems to be very interesting part of marketing. Nowadays technology changes almost every field of life so it is not surprising that also marketing.
Unknown said…
Really interesting video, it gave me something to think about. Regarding your first question, neurobiology just like any other branch of knowledge can be used in both right and wrong intentions. :) Will the big companies use this knowledge to market their products more effectively? I believe so. They do this already, why would they cease that practice? I'm not entirely sure, but I think the best way we can "protect" ourselves is simply understanding the mechanisms behind the marketing strategies and... by being cautious.
Julia Osiak said…
I have mixed feelings about neuromarketing. On one hand it creates opportunity for a very aggressive and forceful campaigns. On the other hand though, any research done by the companies can be very insightful and bring us more knowledge about how the human brain functions. The provided footage was really disturbing but what hit me the most after watching it, was the level of our ignorance and the tendency to 'look away'. As they say, ignorance is bliss...
As to protecting ourselves, I think that unfortunately this might not be a fair fight. The companies will be getting better at targeting and reaching for our feelings and desires. What is left, is being aware of their actions and at least trying to filter through them to make more rational and thought through decisions.
Unknown said…
Do you think that discovering how our brain functions and using this knowledge is going in the right direction?
For sure this kind of research is useful for people but I am not sure if it is going right direction.
Will companies be able to manipulate our emotions with even bigger precision?
They are able to do that even now but in the future this kind of practices will be more popular for sure.
How can we protect ourselves from being targets of such marketing strategies?
I think we can’t protect ourselves completely but we can try to avoid all sort of commercials :)
I believe that such research can bring many benefits to humanity, however like any other research it has to be controlled wisely. Like many other discoveries, good technology can have terrible effects when used the wrong way (vide nuclear power). Unfortunately companies won't stop at nothing to make us feel like we need their products, but that's that's how the free market works. The bottom line is that we need to limit business by enforcing laws and try to find a comprise between liberty and decency.
Unknown said…
It is also interesting that people tend to identify themselves with brands, forgetting that companies are not their friends. Usually when someone say bad things about product, owners would blindly defend it, because they take it personally.
I think the best strategy is to make army of loyal fans that will do the marketing of your products for free, and I'm sure that companies do a lot of research on it.
Sylwia said…
In my opinion there is nothing wrong in neuromarketing. This is a consequence of development, which is a good thing. Of course it can be used wrongly, however people awareness is growing as well. If companies want to invest money to develop such knowledge is fine, as long as at the same time people develop their knowledge and awareness too. We have to achieve balance. This somehow prevents us to be completely dependent.

Regarding the video, I agree with Piotr Chabros, that not neoromarketing is the problem itself. It is just development, knowledge to posses, which will make us all better. The problem are standards of production, which as acceptably by not only politicians, but also whole society. As it was said in the video presented in the article, while doing shopping we do not want to think about production standards, we prefer to ignore it (at least most of us).
I believe that such research can bring many benefits to humanity, however like any other research it has to be controlled wisely. Like many other discoveries, good technology can have terrible effects when used the wrong way (vide nuclear power). Unfortunately companies won't stop at nothing to make us feel like we need their products, but that's that's how the free market works. The bottom line is that we need to limit business by enforcing laws and try to find a comprise between liberty and decency.
Unknown said…
I think that the development of neuromarketing is really disturbing because a high number of companies will not even hesitate to use it against us. Even now one can see to which degree we are orientated on the suggestions of TV advertising, Internet, banners on the street and so on. They basically manipulate us displaying a virtual world. We cannot avoid advertising because otherwise we would have to stay at home all the time, which is rather impossible. I consider that we should limit the advertising down to minimum.
Unknown said…
I’m not sure that discovering how our brain functions and using this knowledge is going in the right direction. I have many doubts.
I’m afraid that companies will be able to manipulate our emotions with even bigger precision. We are too unconscious unfortunatelly. Minority of us know about neuromarketing and many people still are deceived.
I’m not sure that we can protect ourselves from being targets of such marketing strategies. All marketing is masterpiece and it’s very difficult to protect from it.
Marcin Lyzwa said…
I definitely have to agree with your point of view about treatment animals on farms. I support the 'open cage' idea. I like a taste of meat, I like eating meat but I can imagine living without eating meat. We should take care about what we eat and from comes our food.
Marcin Lyzwa said…
sometimes i feel like we've already have 'artificial food product' in supermarkets. Without any problem sometimes we can replace meat with tofu or soya.
Marcin Lyzwa said…
But if you're not afraid of that, it would be easier to make as believe what is true, what is good, what political option is correct?
Marcin Lyzwa said…
And the best example is Apple, they created a need for their products and then made up an army of people who identify themselves with this brand, and they are ready to kill you if you think different about those products.
Marcin Lyzwa said…
I really like your point fo view. But how we can grow our awareness ?
Unknown said…
Neuromarketing is new way to "check" consumers. This is really interesting. It's good to me that science is moving towards the knowledge of our brain. We don't know a lot about brain that is in my opinion the most important part of our body. Brain makes that we think, we make choices that influence to our whole life. In my opinion thanks to neuronarketing we can know what our brains really want to get, feel. Normal marketing impacts on our selection by logo, advertising. Ads usually cheat us and we make bad decisions. Moreover, we usually make mistake because we choose what other people choose. Sometimes we are conformists. Neuromarketing has indisputable advantage because consumers are getting to know their brain want without people opinion and advertisement.
Seisyll said…
What came into my mind after seeing this presentation was one episode of Futurama, where companies devised a way to advertise in the peoples dreams. I am all for the research of the brain, but this particular thing makes me feel uneasy.
Is there a way to protect yourself from that? Nope. Best example, subliminal messaging. What happens at the unconscious level, stays at unconscious level. Meaning you do what you are told without realizing it.
Unknown said…
In my opinion it is an interesting way for consumer-type society. I fond of technologies that could influence like that on the people's mind in simple way, however I don't think that it is something that new, as we can be victims of such thing in regular supermarkets just by standing in line. Means of protection against that things I think more in selfcontrole and understanding what you really need and what you want, this is difficult, but possible.
Unknown said…
Even that I wrote that it is possible to protect ourselfs from that, I agree with you about that fact, that what is going on subcontious is staying there. Such methods also were used by intelligence during Cold War 'sleeping agents', I don't remember were they are sucessful or not, but it is just another way to use our brain, so yeah, if someone with knowledge, money and possibility really wants to mess-up with your brain he will do it.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?