What is the credit crisis?
The founding fathers of the US wanted to
create a “flawless” financial system that would not allow private interests to
impact on fiscal policy. Nowadays we can call it worldwide financial fiasco
involving the best investment advisors in the world. What they created is so
amazing, so smart, but also really difficult to comprehend.
Dictionary
Few explanations just to make things easy
from here on out:
1)
Sub-prime mortgages – basically it means giving loans to people who might have difficulty
maintaining the repayment plan. These loans have higher interest rates, poor
quality collateral in order to compensate for higher credit risk.
2)
Collateralized debt
obligations – or CDOs, are a structured financial
product that gathers cash flow-generating assets and “repackages” these assets
into product that can be sold further to investors.
3)
Frozen credit markets - A period of time when banks either do not have enough money to give
loans to individuals or corporations or they implement strict rules and
limitations regarding loan qualification.
4)
Credit defaults swaps – or CDS is a financial swap agreement. The seller of the CDS will
compensate the buyer in the event of a loan default or other credit event
(further crisis). It was invented by Blythe Masters from JP Morgan in 1994.
So who is affected by this scheme?
Well, simply everyone. The credit crisis in
the early XXI brought two groups of people together: Home owners and Investors.
For simplicity, home owners represent their mortgages (or loans tbh) while
investors represent piles of $$ (pension funds, sovereign funds, insurance
companies, mutual funds……..). Both of them wouldn’t meet in normal world, but
hey we have bankers, brokers (the whole of Wall St.).
How did it start?
Years ago, the investors were literally
stacking piles and piles of $$, looking for possibilities to make even more.
Before, they would usually buy Treasure Bills with AAA rating (the safest
investment there is). But things changed after dot.com bust (and in extent
after 9/11) Federal Reserve chairman lowered the interest rates on these bills
to mere 1% (it was to keep the economy strong). Investors started looking for
other possibilities. On the other hand it meant that banks could borrow money
from the F.R. with only 1% interest. Every single bank was interested in this.
Hell, even offshore banks were interested! What did it do? It made easy for
everyone to get credit with very good conditions. Banks were crazy about them.
It allowed them to amplify their outcomes from international deals by hundreds.
Let me explain…
How does the leverage work???
In a normal situation, with a 10zł in
your pocket you could only buy 1 item for 10zł. But it is possible to sell this
item to someone else for 11zł. Profit of 1zł. Simple and easy. Let’s go
further. With that 10zł in your pocket, you go and borrow another 990zł (funny
fact, it was possible to get credit like that before this crisis). So now with
that you have 1000zł you go and buy 100 boxes and sell them to someone for
1100zł. So now, paying back your 990zł (with interest another 10zł) you made a
profit of (100zł minus you initial 10zł) 90zł. Leverage turns good deals into
better deals. This is one of the most common ways banks make their $$.
what now?
Wall St. takes all the money that it can
from the banking system, and they make even more money with leverage. Paying
back, leaves them with insane amount of profit. Investors (which I mentioned
before) started to get involved in this. Now this is where the brilliance of Walls
St. comes in. They figured out that they could connect investors with home
owners by mortgages. But how?
Exactly, how?
Newlyweds want their first house! So they
save some $$ for down payment (initial payment usually in cash as security) and
contact their mortgage broker which then connects them to a lender. The broker
(of course) makes some commission and the family buys a house. This is good
(and sometimes the only way) because housing prices were going up constantly
for years now. Now, the lender makes a deal with an investment banker who wants
to buy the mortgage. The lender sells then the mortgage for a very nice fee.
This procedure is multiplied by thousands as the investor borrowed a pile of
money from banks (as explained somewhere higher). To imagine this, let’s say he
puts every mortgage he has in one item (a box). Now every month he gets a nice
payment from home/mortgage owners. Now, this box gets analyzed by the best
bankers in the world and put in three groups:
-
Safe
-
OK
-
Risky
Anyways, they put everything in one product
called CDO. Now, if some owners don’t pay their mortgage, or worse, default on
their mortgage, less and less money is being put into CBOs. To compensate for
higher risk, the “risky” group gets higher rate of return while “safe” receives
lower rate (but just to make little more out of the “safe” group, be safest
group can be insured for a small fee called CDS). Credit rating agencies will
grade each of the group AAA for safe, BBB for ok and unrated for rest.
The AAA is then sold to other investors,
safe and easy $$, the BBB are sold to other bankers while the worst and the
most dangerous are resold to hedge funds (or other feeling little braver than
usual) all while the initial banker get nice fees (usually more than 6 figures)
for sales. He then repays loans and makes pure profit.
Where did it go wrong?
Investors wanting more. That was the root
of the problem. Before this boom, there were not enough mortgages to supply a
steady line of investments, so the mortgage brokers and bankers had to find
other sources. They did have a solution. When a home owner defaults on his
mortgage, a lender gets the house. And since (like mentioned before) houses
constantly increase in value, and since they are covered if the home owner
defaults, they still make their money and can even further extend their work
areas. They began to add risk to mortgages, like no down payment, no proof of
income or anything just to increase the number of mortgages being paid.
Basically free money. Instead of stable and risk free mortgages (prime
mortgage), they started borrowing to less responsible groups of people
(sub-prime mortgage). The scheme of selling CDOs applies for both types of
mortgages. Everyone is getting money, until…
Until what?
Until, groups of home owners (sub-prime
mortgage CDOs) start to default on their mortgage. Bankers gets their house,
but since this CDO had higher risk, more and more owners default. No more
monthly payments from his investments, only houses. He can sell them at first,
but soon there are so many houses for sales that they are creating more supply
that there is demand. Now the house prices don’t increase anymore (when in fact
they went down like crazy, 60% to 80% in 12 months).
Now the homeowners that are still paying
their mortgage, their house doesn’t increase in value anymore. With other
prices going down, their house is no different. Think about it for a second –
home owner pays a mortgage for a house that he initially bought for 500.000zł
when now its value is around 100.000zł. Since their mortgage was so open with
no limitations, they just default on their mortgage. Simple as that.
Now, the investment banker has CDOs that
are worthless. Since they are not the best CDOs anymore, the investor doesn’t
want to buy them anymore. Banker is now in a big trouble. Why? He borrowed
millions sometimes even billions of dollars for CDOs which he cannot sell to
anyone.
What did happen next?
Investment banks couldn’t sell their CDOs,
they cannot even get rid of them. They’re not the only one. Investors had
previously bought thousands of such CDOs which they cannot turn into profits
and cannot sell to anyone either. The lender is trying to sell his mortgage,
but no investment banker will buy them anymore (mortgage brokers were fired by
tens of thousands throughout the US). The whole financial system FROZE. The
small ticking bombs were the nail in the coffin for most of the financial
system nodes. They started going bankrupt. But even worse, the home owners had
worthless mortgages that they were still paying off.
Question time!
1)
What happens next?
2)
How would you react as a home
owner during the mortgage crisis?
3)
Naah it’s just these two, don’
worry.
Comments
Personally I do not have a mortgage and no one from my closest family has. I hope I will never have to take one. Of course I'm dreaming of my own place, but I don't want to achieving it with bank help. I'm aware that without it, it might be hard to fullfil this dream. However decades before us people did it. Even my grandparents build their house without mortage. It takes more time, but it is possible.
What's more I also see advantages of not having a house or flat especially with mortage. When posses one you are somehow stuck in one place. I know you can always sell it, but it's not so simple if you do not want to lose on this transaction. Without such property you can easly move from one place to the other. This solution fits me. I do not want to spend rest of my life in Warsaw. So its unlikely that I will ever have a house with mortage.
To sum up no one force you to take out a mortage, so the best solution is not to take it.
But from personal and maybe a bit more ideological point of view, I don't like the whole "credit culture" we observe in western countries. For me it's very strange and maybe even more terrifying that for most people it seems perfectly ok to buy and own things (let it be houses, cars or whatever) they cannot afford, and they're allowed to do so only because some third party (bank) would profit from this!
Maybe houses should be treated different here, but things like new TV sets, cars etc, it just seems like "hey, let's take a credit and buy this new TV to spend our free time watching it instead of use this free time to work and earn some extra money to afford new TV faster". How is that ok?
It's like people couldn't be patient anymore and simply couldn't wait till they save enough money to be able to buy something they want. They want to have it right now, regardless of whether they can afford it right now or not. And such haste is so profitable for others.
As for houses, I grew up seeing my parents working extremely hard and saving money to build their own house from scratch (including buying ground). It took of course very very long time, and we had to put up with some inconveniences, but still I think this is the right way to go.
I agree with those posted their comments earlier that answering to that question requires expert knowledge that none of us (I’m sorry if I offend someone) poses. And even if we had that knowledge, global economy depends on so many variables that it is more guessing (or estimating if you prefer that term) that knowing what will happen next. The one thing I’m sure about is that financial crisis we now face proved that free market without any form of government control will eventually in some point lead us to a crisis like the one we face right now. That something has to change. I don’t know how or in which direction, but the system that banks grew “too big to fall” is not good for the entire society but only to the few.
As for the second question the answer id pretty simple. If you can afford to live in a house you buy a house. If you can’t afford it don’t buy! I think that many people forget this simple rule.
These advisors, known under the informal name of "Psingwin" were supposed to develop a recovery plan for the US to swiftly repair all the damage caused by the crisis. However to the cow strike that took place not long after the specialists were hired, a tremendous lack of beef shocked the US, leaving the people only with chicken meat:
http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/484147/731152.jpg
This might not seem as much of a problem, however Psingwins eat exclusively beef. When presented with chicken meat, the specialists were outraged by such mistreatment and refused to work anymore. The offical spokesman of the Psingwin kind, Reginald McKlusky, said: "This shall not stand. We Psignwin are specialists of the highest skill and we refuse to work under such inhumane conditions". From that moment on the US government was left alone with the financial problem and so the world was left on the mercy of fate. May the Ancient Ones have mercy upon us, all hail the great Cthulhu.
---------------------------
I've heard and read about this topic many times and honesty I'm quite bored with it. :P I must say that Konrad expressed pretty much everything I could have to say on the matter, so I decided to write something that could be at least mildly amusing. Hope it was. Anyways, people do stupid things and then stuff like this happens. Enough said.
But personally I think one of two things could happen "next" (of course after domestic war/revolution):
- We will have to go back to situation where people exchange things by another things not money.
- Gold will be the only method of payment. - Gold like any other reliable thing on the earth is finite, unlike the paper money.
How would I react? I don't know and I hope I'll never have to know.
I have no idea, it's very difficult to see the future in economy.
2. How would you react as a home owner during the mortgage crisis?
I'm very resistant to taking mortgages in the first place, but if I had situation like that, I'd involve my family to help me get out of this situation, because very quickly it gets ugly.
If I knew I would be billionaire or billionaire x 10. Seriously what can I say about economic situation of US… I know that $ is going down and I am happy about it because its shopping time ;)
How would you react as a home owner during the mortgage crisis?
I love hypothetical questions with hypothetical answers… I don’t know what in this situation should be done. I know that I would try to keep home at all costs.
- Aleksander Towcik
China issues stored dollars onto market and we are in even bigger s.. problematic situation. Nah just kidding. I think everything goes back to normal, we had our crysis now is the time to get better and live on until the next crysis, the crysis 4.
How would you react as a home owner during the mortgage crisis?
Hard to imagine myself in such a situation really, but I'll go with what lukasz-anwajler said ask familly for help