Skip to main content

Week 6: THE CREDIT/MORTGAGE CRISIS

What is the credit crisis?

The founding fathers of the US wanted to create a “flawless” financial system that would not allow private interests to impact on fiscal policy. Nowadays we can call it worldwide financial fiasco involving the best investment advisors in the world. What they created is so amazing, so smart, but also really difficult to comprehend.

Dictionary

Few explanations just to make things easy from here on out:
1)       Sub-prime mortgages – basically it means giving loans to people who might have difficulty maintaining the repayment plan. These loans have higher interest rates, poor quality collateral in order to compensate for higher credit risk.
2)       Collateralized debt obligations – or CDOs, are a structured financial product that gathers cash flow-generating assets and “repackages” these assets into product that can be sold further to investors.
3)       Frozen credit markets - A period of time when banks either do not have enough money to give loans to individuals or corporations or they implement strict rules and limitations regarding loan qualification.
4)       Credit defaults swaps – or CDS is a financial swap agreement. The seller of the CDS will compensate the buyer in the event of a loan default or other credit event (further crisis). It was invented by Blythe Masters from JP Morgan in 1994.

So who is affected by this scheme?

Well, simply everyone. The credit crisis in the early XXI brought two groups of people together: Home owners and Investors. For simplicity, home owners represent their mortgages (or loans tbh) while investors represent piles of $$ (pension funds, sovereign funds, insurance companies, mutual funds……..). Both of them wouldn’t meet in normal world, but hey we have bankers, brokers (the whole of Wall St.).

How did it start?

Years ago, the investors were literally stacking piles and piles of $$, looking for possibilities to make even more. Before, they would usually buy Treasure Bills with AAA rating (the safest investment there is). But things changed after dot.com bust (and in extent after 9/11) Federal Reserve chairman lowered the interest rates on these bills to mere 1% (it was to keep the economy strong). Investors started looking for other possibilities. On the other hand it meant that banks could borrow money from the F.R. with only 1% interest. Every single bank was interested in this. Hell, even offshore banks were interested! What did it do? It made easy for everyone to get credit with very good conditions. Banks were crazy about them. It allowed them to amplify their outcomes from international deals by hundreds. Let me explain…

How does the leverage work???

In a normal situation, with a 10zł in your pocket you could only buy 1 item for 10zł. But it is possible to sell this item to someone else for 11zł. Profit of 1zł. Simple and easy. Let’s go further. With that 10zł in your pocket, you go and borrow another 990zł (funny fact, it was possible to get credit like that before this crisis). So now with that you have 1000zł you go and buy 100 boxes and sell them to someone for 1100zł. So now, paying back your 990zł (with interest another 10zł) you made a profit of (100zł minus you initial 10zł) 90zł. Leverage turns good deals into better deals. This is one of the most common ways banks make their $$.

what now?

Wall St. takes all the money that it can from the banking system, and they make even more money with leverage. Paying back, leaves them with insane amount of profit. Investors (which I mentioned before) started to get involved in this. Now this is where the brilliance of Walls St. comes in. They figured out that they could connect investors with home owners by mortgages. But how?

Exactly, how?

Newlyweds want their first house! So they save some $$ for down payment (initial payment usually in cash as security) and contact their mortgage broker which then connects them to a lender. The broker (of course) makes some commission and the family buys a house. This is good (and sometimes the only way) because housing prices were going up constantly for years now. Now, the lender makes a deal with an investment banker who wants to buy the mortgage. The lender sells then the mortgage for a very nice fee. This procedure is multiplied by thousands as the investor borrowed a pile of money from banks (as explained somewhere higher). To imagine this, let’s say he puts every mortgage he has in one item (a box). Now every month he gets a nice payment from home/mortgage owners. Now, this box gets analyzed by the best bankers in the world and put in three groups:
-          Safe
-          OK
-          Risky
Anyways, they put everything in one product called CDO. Now, if some owners don’t pay their mortgage, or worse, default on their mortgage, less and less money is being put into CBOs. To compensate for higher risk, the “risky” group gets higher rate of return while “safe” receives lower rate (but just to make little more out of the “safe” group, be safest group can be insured for a small fee called CDS). Credit rating agencies will grade each of the group AAA for safe, BBB for ok and unrated for rest.
The AAA is then sold to other investors, safe and easy $$, the BBB are sold to other bankers while the worst and the most dangerous are resold to hedge funds (or other feeling little braver than usual) all while the initial banker get nice fees (usually more than 6 figures) for sales. He then repays loans and makes pure profit.

Where did it go wrong?

Investors wanting more. That was the root of the problem. Before this boom, there were not enough mortgages to supply a steady line of investments, so the mortgage brokers and bankers had to find other sources. They did have a solution. When a home owner defaults on his mortgage, a lender gets the house. And since (like mentioned before) houses constantly increase in value, and since they are covered if the home owner defaults, they still make their money and can even further extend their work areas. They began to add risk to mortgages, like no down payment, no proof of income or anything just to increase the number of mortgages being paid. Basically free money. Instead of stable and risk free mortgages (prime mortgage), they started borrowing to less responsible groups of people (sub-prime mortgage). The scheme of selling CDOs applies for both types of mortgages. Everyone is getting money, until…

Until what?

Until, groups of home owners (sub-prime mortgage CDOs) start to default on their mortgage. Bankers gets their house, but since this CDO had higher risk, more and more owners default. No more monthly payments from his investments, only houses. He can sell them at first, but soon there are so many houses for sales that they are creating more supply that there is demand. Now the house prices don’t increase anymore (when in fact they went down like crazy, 60% to 80% in 12 months).
Now the homeowners that are still paying their mortgage, their house doesn’t increase in value anymore. With other prices going down, their house is no different. Think about it for a second – home owner pays a mortgage for a house that he initially bought for 500.000zł when now its value is around 100.000zł. Since their mortgage was so open with no limitations, they just default on their mortgage. Simple as that.
Now, the investment banker has CDOs that are worthless. Since they are not the best CDOs anymore, the investor doesn’t want to buy them anymore. Banker is now in a big trouble. Why? He borrowed millions sometimes even billions of dollars for CDOs which he cannot sell to anyone.

What did happen next?

Investment banks couldn’t sell their CDOs, they cannot even get rid of them. They’re not the only one. Investors had previously bought thousands of such CDOs which they cannot turn into profits and cannot sell to anyone either. The lender is trying to sell his mortgage, but no investment banker will buy them anymore (mortgage brokers were fired by tens of thousands throughout the US). The whole financial system FROZE. The small ticking bombs were the nail in the coffin for most of the financial system nodes. They started going bankrupt. But even worse, the home owners had worthless mortgages that they were still paying off.

Question time!

1)       What happens next?
2)       How would you react as a home owner during the mortgage crisis?

3)       Naah it’s just these two, don’ worry. 

Comments

Unknown said…
That's a one very NOT interesting topic :P What happens next? We do know it. US pumped a ton of money to save their domestic economy from collapsing. The same happened during Wall Street Crush, but the reasons changed as far as i remember. As a house owner during the mortgage crisis I would do a deep research about things that can be done. My first thought would be maybe to try to sell the house to outside US. I am sure that there are lots of people who would love to move to US but dont have the money for it. Maybe during mortgage crisis houses would be cheep enough to buy them and the crisis never happen.
Sylwia said…
I do not know what will happen next and I'm not enought knowledgeable in finances to judge.
Personally I do not have a mortgage and no one from my closest family has. I hope I will never have to take one. Of course I'm dreaming of my own place, but I don't want to achieving it with bank help. I'm aware that without it, it might be hard to fullfil this dream. However decades before us people did it. Even my grandparents build their house without mortage. It takes more time, but it is possible.
What's more I also see advantages of not having a house or flat especially with mortage. When posses one you are somehow stuck in one place. I know you can always sell it, but it's not so simple if you do not want to lose on this transaction. Without such property you can easly move from one place to the other. This solution fits me. I do not want to spend rest of my life in Warsaw. So its unlikely that I will ever have a house with mortage.
To sum up no one force you to take out a mortage, so the best solution is not to take it.
diana said…
I don't think I can post any reasonable comment on this topic - it certainly requires much financial and economic knowledge, and I don't claim to have such.
But from personal and maybe a bit more ideological point of view, I don't like the whole "credit culture" we observe in western countries. For me it's very strange and maybe even more terrifying that for most people it seems perfectly ok to buy and own things (let it be houses, cars or whatever) they cannot afford, and they're allowed to do so only because some third party (bank) would profit from this!
Maybe houses should be treated different here, but things like new TV sets, cars etc, it just seems like "hey, let's take a credit and buy this new TV to spend our free time watching it instead of use this free time to work and earn some extra money to afford new TV faster". How is that ok?
It's like people couldn't be patient anymore and simply couldn't wait till they save enough money to be able to buy something they want. They want to have it right now, regardless of whether they can afford it right now or not. And such haste is so profitable for others.
As for houses, I grew up seeing my parents working extremely hard and saving money to build their own house from scratch (including buying ground). It took of course very very long time, and we had to put up with some inconveniences, but still I think this is the right way to go.
What will happen next is a million dollar question. I don’t really believe that there is someone in this world that knows the answer to this question. Of course after the fact there are many who state that they predicted everything.

I agree with those posted their comments earlier that answering to that question requires expert knowledge that none of us (I’m sorry if I offend someone) poses. And even if we had that knowledge, global economy depends on so many variables that it is more guessing (or estimating if you prefer that term) that knowing what will happen next. The one thing I’m sure about is that financial crisis we now face proved that free market without any form of government control will eventually in some point lead us to a crisis like the one we face right now. That something has to change. I don’t know how or in which direction, but the system that banks grew “too big to fall” is not good for the entire society but only to the few.

As for the second question the answer id pretty simple. If you can afford to live in a house you buy a house. If you can’t afford it don’t buy! I think that many people forget this simple rule.
Tomek Niezgoda said…
While i don’t know too much about this topic, I have watched some videos and read a few articles. One of the solutions suggested is regulation. Of course, American banks will oppose this but Canada has had heavy regulations for a long time now and their economy is more resistant. They didn’t have as many collapses in history because of this. “Too big to jail” is a phrase often associated with the current situation. For a long time after the start of the crisis no one paid the consequences although it seemed obvious who was to blame. Today, there is still a lot of discussion about it and what price will that be.
To calculate an accurate prediction of what will happen next, we must consider the many various factors, that may (or may not) have impact on the matter in question. As we all now, after the financial system had frozen the US government hired polish financial advisors working in Antarctica, specialised in the matter of freeze: http://i1.kwejk.pl/site_media/obrazki/2012/02/652fa50a985c4cad6cfcc72cfb02bb31.jpg?1329394368
These advisors, known under the informal name of "Psingwin" were supposed to develop a recovery plan for the US to swiftly repair all the damage caused by the crisis. However to the cow strike that took place not long after the specialists were hired, a tremendous lack of beef shocked the US, leaving the people only with chicken meat:
http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/484147/731152.jpg
This might not seem as much of a problem, however Psingwins eat exclusively beef. When presented with chicken meat, the specialists were outraged by such mistreatment and refused to work anymore. The offical spokesman of the Psingwin kind, Reginald McKlusky, said: "This shall not stand. We Psignwin are specialists of the highest skill and we refuse to work under such inhumane conditions". From that moment on the US government was left alone with the financial problem and so the world was left on the mercy of fate. May the Ancient Ones have mercy upon us, all hail the great Cthulhu.
---------------------------
I've heard and read about this topic many times and honesty I'm quite bored with it. :P I must say that Konrad expressed pretty much everything I could have to say on the matter, so I decided to write something that could be at least mildly amusing. Hope it was. Anyways, people do stupid things and then stuff like this happens. Enough said.
Natalia said…
There is so many post apocaliptic movies - choose any and you will get your answer :)
But personally I think one of two things could happen "next" (of course after domestic war/revolution):
- We will have to go back to situation where people exchange things by another things not money.
- Gold will be the only method of payment. - Gold like any other reliable thing on the earth is finite, unlike the paper money.
How would I react? I don't know and I hope I'll never have to know.
lukasz-anwajler said…
1. What happens next?

I have no idea, it's very difficult to see the future in economy.

2. How would you react as a home owner during the mortgage crisis?

I'm very resistant to taking mortgages in the first place, but if I had situation like that, I'd involve my family to help me get out of this situation, because very quickly it gets ugly.
Unknown said…
What happens next?
If I knew I would be billionaire or billionaire x 10. Seriously what can I say about economic situation of US… I know that $ is going down and I am happy about it because its shopping time ;)

How would you react as a home owner during the mortgage crisis?
I love hypothetical questions with hypothetical answers… I don’t know what in this situation should be done. I know that I would try to keep home at all costs.
alt_pl said…
First of all I will try as hard as I can not to have anything in common with banks - I simply don't trust this institution. I will try to gather all money I can to buy my very own flat or house. It is hard but achievable. I think that people should not complain about banks because idea is simple. Mortgage are not fair in many ways but still... I prefer not have any.
- Aleksander Towcik
Seisyll said…
What happens next?
China issues stored dollars onto market and we are in even bigger s.. problematic situation. Nah just kidding. I think everything goes back to normal, we had our crysis now is the time to get better and live on until the next crysis, the crysis 4.

How would you react as a home owner during the mortgage crisis?
Hard to imagine myself in such a situation really, but I'll go with what lukasz-anwajler said ask familly for help

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?