Skip to main content

[Week 10] Medical Gadgets



I would like you to read the article Medical Gadgets


Comments

Tomek Niezgoda said…
Do you self-diagnose using Google?
I try to do it sometimes because it's much faster. So far, most of my diseases were minor and didn't require a doctor's opinion. I found out that sometimes information from the Internet can be spot on, like opinions about which brand of a certain type of product is the best.

What is the role of the doctor when patients can self-diagnose using apps, gadgets or internet browsers?
Not all diseases can be easily diagnosed using the Internet. Doctors should always control what the patient is trying to do.

How do you think the future looks like for such appliances? Will they become popular and be used on a daily basis?
These devices can prove very convenient to people who have to check their health constantly. Not so much for those who have no major health issues.
Kacper K said…
1.Do you self-diagnose using Google?
I think the ability to self-diagnose is a wonderful development. Any normally intelligent person can quickly realise what is likely or not to be relevant. A patronizing attitude often adopted by medical professionals is not helpful. I have found like in any other profession there are skilled and fairly useless doctors. I see no harm in knowledge and perhaps this is a threat to the doctors monopoly on health issues.

2.What is the role of the doctor when patients can self-diagnose using apps, gadgets or internet browsers?
I think the doctor is still needed because all previously invented methods are only informatics methods that use scripts. Programs use a single path to diagnose the problem. The doctor has the experience, which no program or machine will never have. The application can only rely on the results of the study, and all that can be measured (for example, blood pressure). Your doctor may notice other aspects, the machine will not be able to see (for example, a reflex action)

3.How do you think the future looks like for such appliances? Will they become popular and be used on a daily basis?

I think that this application will not be difficult to use. Apple this year is going to present iWatch watch by which you can make biometric measurements of the body, and the iPhone will store this information and a nice way to present them to the user. For sure it will be a curiosity. Everyone likes the gadgets so my opinion will be a boom for such applications and gadgets
Kasia Kmieć said…
Usually when I go to see dr Google I find out that I have cancer :) Although there was one exception when it was actually true (luckily for me it wasn’t cancer that time). But the exception proves the rule. I am a little health-freak so any health gadget is fascinating for me. But I cannot believe that any gadget or software itself can replace the idea of deep examination of a human being. A doctor can spot even a tiny symptom of a disease, which a computer wouldn’t find itself (without a sick person inputting the symptoms which he/she had noticed). Despite all of it I think those gadgets would be really popular, they would provide a better understanding of a problem, it would force a person to see a doctor and, by that, maybe save his/her life.
Dalvia said…
Wow, we will become total hypohodrics.... monitoring ourselves all the time, minding about our health care... it's just too much.
Still would be nice to know in advance, when cancer starts in our body, or some serious inflamation.
About your questions: I used to google, but I became paranoid, and stopped for ever. If something is wrong is for a doctor to say, not google.
I think that it's annoying for doctors to hear those "I know it all" patient. And if he/she are likethat, they don't treat them well, as we wouldn't such a person... so it's a bad thing....
I think that nothing can replace directs visit to the doctor. You can diagnose yourself initialy. If something is worrying, then you have to go to specialist. In my opinion google isn't good medical guide. From my experience, some web forum and other site inform people that they have a serious illness like cancer, when they have normal headache or something like that.
Sylwia said…
Do you self-diagnose using Google?
Yes, I often do that. However I almost always go to the doctor afterwards or sometimes I just ask pharmacist for advice.

What is the role of the doctor when patients can self-diagnose using apps, gadgets or internet browsers?
Medical check made by doctor can’t be skipped. Even if we do right self diagnose we can’t get medicines without prescription or do test. However personally I don’t believe in such way of diagnosing diseases. I don’t say it is always wrong, but it is better to verify it with professional.

How do you think the future looks like for such appliances? Will they become popular and be used on a daily basis?
They will be more and more popular. These gadgets are easy to use and give us quick feedback as well as we don’t waste time in medical centre.
alt_pl said…
Do you self-diagnose using Google?

I do believe that such practices are very dumb. I think that searching or checking drugs on prescription with google is good but self-diagnosis... Most people do not have qualifications to do so.

What is the role of the doctor when patients can self-diagnose using apps, gadgets or internet browsers?

It is still important. I know that self-diagnosis in minor health treatments can help but it shouldn't allow patients to use only domestic or "application"-estic ways to cure themselves.

How do you think the future looks like for such appliances? Will they become popular and be used on a daily basis?

I hope that won't happen. I think that technology should be help but not solve our problems.
Unknown said…
Questions:
Do you self-diagnose using Google?
I think I do. If I feel some how ill I tend to self diagnose myself by looking up similar symptoms in google. I think that this make me more comftoble. Knowing what I am up against before I can see my doctor. Sometimes we have to wait a long time before this will be possible. Thats why it is a good idea to self diagnose ourself. However I do not think that this is a replacement for tradicional doctor`s examination.
What is the role of the doctor when patients can self-diagnose using apps, gadgets or internet browsers?
App will not guarantee you a hundred percentage correct diagnose. Even that I think apps are really cool and usefull, they are still very primitive and limited. Complex healt problem might be to difficult for them to diagnose.
How do you think the future looks like for such appliances? Will they become popular and be used on a daily basis?
It is very hard to say how the future will look like. Everything develops so rapidly that we can not say what will change. I am sure they will be widely used on a daily basis.
Darkia said…
i'm sometimes do it, but not care much about it. I prefer just to meet specjalist.
Role of doctors in case when people try to diagnose themself is to convince that internet can be wrong. It's can be difficult sometimes.
Mayby when to this apps will be add a pro equpment, then yes. bot for now most of them are just pice of rubble.
Anonymous said…
Do you self-diagnose using Google?
Sometimes I try to find a diagnosis on the Internet. In most cases coming out that I should have cancer or something worse. It induces in me a huge dose of uncertainty.

What is the role of the doctor when patients can self-diagnose using apps, gadgets or internet browsers?
The doctor is always professional. Undergone a long process of education and certainly he has a lot of experience. In my opinion we should always consult our problems with your doctor.

How do you think the future looks like for such appliances? Will they become popular and be used on a daily basis?
For sure. A couple of years and it will be standard. It must be just more professional and reliable.
Online consultation is what is already happening, and I think it's a great cause :)
In my opinion the machine will never replace the human and we should always get some knowledge from a doctor while we are sick. Of course we can by ourselves set up a preliminary diagnosis using Google, but it will nonprofessional and it easily to mistake. A doctor profession is like an architect. Without an architectural qualifications the common person will never be able to design a house or bridge, the same applies to medical skills. Of course we can use some application, internet and medical tools, but it should be used in auxiliaries purposes for a patient and a doctor, which will be able to notice progress of illness.
Unknown said…
I believe while not now those devices are not too complex, advanced and useful, I can see amazing future for them. Imagine being to monitor "stats" and performance of your body in real time - knowing exactly what happens and being able to react instantly in case something is wrong, knowing what is wrong. I think the future for medical gadgets is very bright, just at this moment they are at the very beginning of development with current devices being precursors to their prime time which I guess we will have to wait for decades to see.
Unknown said…
Do you self-diagnose using Google?
Sometimes I ask google what is happening with me :D But I don’t think this is proper way.

What is the role of the doctor when patients can self-diagnose using apps, gadgets or internet browsers?
Role is simple – check if gadgets, browsers and other devices done their job well.

How do you think the future looks like for such appliances? Will they become popular and be used on a daily basis?
People are using devices such as pulsometers and blood-presure monitors every day so it is already daily basis…
Sometimes when I feel some minor illness, a headache for example I like to google it to learn perhaps what can be the causes and remedies. However I never treat this way of dealing with health issues as a serious one - if an illness persist or in any way seems serious I run to the doctor. I believe that people study hard to becoming a doctor for a reason and you can't just diagnose yourself using the internet. And once you go to the doctor don't try to be smart! I really don't get people who try to pretend they know something about medicine just because they read some stuff on the internet. It might make the doctors work actually harder if YOU start telling him what disease you (think) you contracted.
Unknown said…
Do you self-diagnose using Google?
If I can find something in google I already know the disease because you can find out only easy ones there. Its not a good idea to treat google as doctor.
What is the role of the doctor when patients can self-diagnose using apps, gadgets or internet browsers?
It will pass a long time before doctors could feel threaten. This kind of aplications
are at very low stage.
How do you think the future looks like for such appliances? Will they become popular and be used on a daily basis?
It would be great if we had machines like in movies Prometheus or Elisium.
Aplications will be more popular but someones bad interpretation of disease and death can
slow down its development.
Unknown said…
1) Do you self-diagnose using Google?
Well I can do some startup research on my illness, but person which should tell is a doctor not a computer.
2) What is the role of the doctor when patients can self-diagnose using apps, gadgets or internet browsers?
Doctor should be that last line of diagnosis to confirm what was diagnosed and what treatment should be applied.
3) How do you think the future looks like for such appliances? Will they become popular and be used on a daily basis?
I thiknk that belivong ONLY on machines is a bad idea.
Talking to ithe people keeps us human and build society, if we kill it something bad will come...

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?