Skip to main content

Week 11: Massive extinction of bees


Causes

We can observe the increased extinction of bees. This problem has begun in USA due to the usage of chemistry and biotechnology  in farming. Probably during the last winter 1/3 bee populations died. The probable cause  are pesticides used during the florescence of plants, parasites, viruses and malnutrition of insects.


(http://alikorkmaz.blogcu.com/balarisi-apis-mellifera-l-kolonilerinde-kulucka-alaninin-hesap/13245540)

The fight against destruction of bees

Nowadays, the American scientists are trying to retrieve the bees population in their country, by importing bees from other countries. Scientists want to invent some method of transfer of good genetic material taken from the strongest bees from Europe. The goal is to create genetically  modified bees which will be  resistant to chemicals.


Future

Scientists from Maryland and Department of Agriculture confirmed that the typical chemicals used in agriculture have been causing the extinction of bees but Richard Fell doesn’t believe in it.
Reading this kind of information we can conclude some groups of scientists simply don’t care; still, they  study them to create small robots, similar to bees. It looks like some scientists know that the bees cannot longer be rescued.
(http://robo-group.blogfa.com/author-aminalg.aspx)

1.  How we can stop the extinction of bees?
2. Do scientists believe that the creation of new robotic technology is more profitable than  the rescue of bees?


Comments

Tomek Niezgoda said…
The extinction of bees is something we don't notice easily. Sure, the prices of some products can go up but otherwise this is much like the greenhouse effect. There is proof that the world is changing but as long as it doesn't affect us directly we are not concerned about it. I think genetic modification of bees is the right solution. We can go really far with this and produce better results sooner than trying to create robotic replacements.
diana said…
I also think (although I don't really have much information about it) that genetics could help with this problem. But in the short run, some law changes would be even more powerful I think - why couldn't they simply ban the use of such chemicals? From the post I understand that this is mainly US problem, which implies that there are parts of the world where farmers are somehow happy without such pesticides. So if they can do without it, it's not so much necessary. So why use it in the first place, if it creates more problems than profits? Maybe it's an effect of powerful marketing of some chemical companies? Anyway, a bit too less information to properly judge this situation.
Sylwia said…
I'm not an expert, but I heard a few times radio audition about this. The experts claims that it is global problem. Even in Poland pepole, who earn money from beekeeping, experienced decreasing of bees population. It affects not only their business, but whole agriculture. Since today bees are irreplaceable. We haven't found technology of pollination. Probably because no one was looking for it earlier. However now many reaserch has been carreid out. I think the most important is to try to rescue real bees, but we shouldn't give up developing robotic technology as well.
I can't agree with Diana, that the best solution is to forbidden using fertilizers and other chemicals in agriculture. If we ban them globally in short period of time, it would cause massive food availability issues. We couldn't be able to produce enough food, as harvest wouldn't be so immune and that is way prices would increase rapidly too. It is better to make bees resistant for these chemicals. On the other hand I'm afraid that by modifing bees DNA we can start other, bigger problem.
I’ve heard that the extinction of bees is a big problem and can have serious consequences for all human kind. I don’t have any knowledge no how can we stop that from happening. The only thing I’ve heard is that framers have to limit the usage of fertilizers but that will be hard to enforce on every one of them.

I found the idea of replacing bees wit small robots interesting but very hard to achieve. Replacing a very complicated thing like a part of ecosystem with a machine is far beyond our technological capabilities at present time. Remember that bees not only are responsible for pollination of flowers but they are also a part of food chain in the ecosystem and that role can’t be replaced by a machine.

The extinction of bees is surely an issue that has to be resolved sooner than later, but I just don’t have any idea of how to achieve that.
Natalia said…
I don't think actualy we can do anything now. We can think about modification of their DNA but it is like the lottery, it can bring us new better species of ultra stong bees, but DNA diversity is the key to survival. If this strong bees would get sick - every with same DNA (which could be 90%) would extinct in one season.
In my opinion by extinction of this key spiece "mother nature" say to us that we are doning something wrong. How this food possibly could be good for us if it is covered in poison which kills insects? We should stop using such posions in the first place not create robotic bees
Unknown said…
The extinction of bees? Is there really something like this? Bees have been bred for ages and they are still alive ( that i call tell you from my bite marks form lat year). I can tell you that bees have been used for searching drugs in transportations, but i have never heard of a robo=bees before. If they will be able to replace real bees? I don;t know. But in my opinion there is no circumstances against it.
lukasz-anwajler said…
I don't think that the real problem is amount of food available, but distribution of it.
lukasz-anwajler said…
I know nothing about this issue, but I think we should try to solve this in two ways - by both - reducing the causes of decreasing bees population (chemicals) and researching artifical replacements for them.
Unknown said…
My grandfather’s hobby is beekeeping. Since I was a little child, I remember beehives on his backyard and bees flying around. I often watched how my grandparents extracted honey. A small rectangular frame was changing into a golden liquid. I couldn’t understand how it was possible. It was a sweet magic to me. Therefore a massive extension of bees is an important topic to me. Unfortunately, I am afraid that it is too late to protect all of the bees.

Many people are driven only by self-interests and profits. Theses people will not change their behavior. They won’t stop using toxic fertilizers. Money is the only thing that counts to them. I think that there are also people who are simply negligent. They don’t care or don’t understand the harm they cause to bees.

I had read before another article about extensions of bees. According to the article, when bees will die, doing their work will cost millions of dollars! Millions instead of free work… That’s just sad and scary.
diana said…
Well, I didn't mean banning all fertilizers or chemicals - I meant only those which also kill bees (I assumed that not all of them do this because i.e. in Europa, where it's also commonly used, such huge impact on bees is not observed).
Well now, this is a problem I would never notice on my own. Really, I wouldn't know about it, but then again it isn't really that kind of problem you hear people talking about now, is it? Bees aren't really a very big part of my life, not only as bugs but also as products that come from them. The “solution” of creating robotic bees actually amuses me, because it's no real solution, but a workaround. I don't think that there is no better way to handle this issue, most probably there is no more profitable way.
Unknown said…
Bees are dying? Sad I must say. I think we can’t do much about it. Of course we can create anti-pesticides organization and start to complain about this matter  Seriously though it will become huge problem because bees are very important to agriculture and by that for us too. Robo-bees? Never seen it before but maybe it will manage to replace the real ones? Hard to say at this stage.
Seisyll said…
We need Dr. BEES!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYtXuBN1Hvc
I admit that bees are necessary to flora, but if they really have another solution which doesn't really require bees then hey, why not give it a try? I prefer that to bees which are genetically modified to resist certain pesticides. Robots are much more friendly, because in case they go rampage we can disable them with EMP :)
armandstanczak said…
I like new problems. They're fun :) Bees, since we make so much $$ out of the whole honey manufacturing thing, we're not gonna let them go. We might make it more contained, but we won't loose them all. On the other hand, robo-bees! I am so ready for the future! Bring it on technology! (I hope they wont sting like the original ones)

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 (09-15.03) VOD

http://www.vod-consulting.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.jpg

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?