Skip to main content

Week 3 [20-26 October]: How does school kill creativity ?

How does school kill creativity ?

Sir Ken Robinson claims that the school kills creativity.  Most of us would instantly oppose such an opinion in the first place. Kids nowadays have tremendous and colossal talents which schools squander pretty savagely. Creativity is now as important in school education as in other fields and we should treat it seriously. Sir Robinson thinks that children are more creative because of their attitude toward a trial or an error. Adults are scared of making errors more often than kids. There is a good story about children's boundless imagination. One girl was asked about her drawing. She answered that she was drawing a picture of God. Her teacher replied that no one knows God. The girl said: ‘the world is about to see what he looks like’. This short story shows that children have boundless creativity. Young kids are not scared of being embarrassed because of their mistakes. This is called creativity. In my opinion we cannot teach kid to be creative  because it is impossible. I suggest giving kids more time to solve the problem. If kids are not working under time pressure, then they are able to release more creativity during lessons. Creativity is all about creating something new. Every new idea, every new music composed etc counts as creative products. The range of scholarly interests in creativity includes multitude of definitions related to majors like cognitive science, technology or economics. We cannot simply measure someone's creativity quotient. Several attempts have been made to develop a creativity quotient of an individual, however these have been unsuccessful. Everyone has a different view, talent and there is no overall solution for valuing creativity. Schools can kill creativity from time to time because there are a few subjects during which when kids are able to show off their imagination. Normally teachers value knowledge during exam. It is really hard to value creativity in the same way.  If we could only deliver more time and freedom to the lessons. For new effective ideas we need more time, more thinking, brainstorming. We don't want to work under pressure waiting for someone's opinion if we do our job well. A video link attached below shows how kids are effective and creative when they have a minute or ten to think about their problem. The most talented people are kids. It is important for parents to give them more freedom to solve their own problems. The school sometimes forgets about connection between intellect and feeling, because the school doesn't permit children to make mistakes. How would you ensure that your kid has enough time to be creative? 


Ted talking about creativity: http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity

Comments

Michal Kulesza said…
The school is killing creativity... This is example of experiment made in Belgium:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hkq343NS3nM and this is example of the crow dealing with similar problems: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZerUbHmuY04
Unknown said…
I agree that creativity cannot be taught. But I think it can be given in a form of adjusting appropriate conditions to the specific person.

Creativity is your potential. I think everybody needs to create or get help creating their own conditions, a state in which they can express their creativity and learn how to do it.

In my case, to be creative about anything I have to be interested about it. As long as can focus I can become more creative.

You have to take care of your creativity!

Honestly, everyone and everything is creative. Everyone and everything can become more creative if one wants to. The first step is to start thinking about it :-)
Unknown said…

I think there are some ways to boost creativity. 
I am very much in favour of the idea of giving children some tools to explore their imagination.
In my opinion those tools are mostly books. When we are reading we must imagine - especially when reading fantasy books, brand new world, the way the characters look like. It is some kind of training for our brain. 

But not only fantasy books are solution. Every single book helps reader to imagine situation, problem, and try to solve by himself. 
I certainly agree with one thing and that is that students are often hesitant to solve a problem because they are afraid of failure, or simply aren't sure about their solution. This is very often not the fault of the school itself, but of the other students who would react immaturely to the proposed solution. That said, I believe that teachers should make a bigger effort to encourage students to express their ideas and try answering the question.
Unknown said…
Actually I feel that most people would automatically answer the first question affirmatively. School system is too heavily focused on solving prepared tests instead of making kids more creative, able to solve problems they have to learn a proper way to answer a standardized test and be ready to pass it to get from one school to another.

On the other hand I think that homeschooling is an even worse idea. In the United States mostly used to brainwash children and cut them off from other kids and consequently from other worldviews. Schools have a huge role in social education and we can learn a lot by interacting with each other. Kids when they're getting to know each other can find out a new passion and see how other people think. I feel that from interacting with others they can find out that everybody thinks differently, share ideas and learn how to properly interact which is important in life.

In my opinion a good solution would be to have smaller student count in every class so a teacher could focus on every pupil more individually and thanks to that more effectively. Adding some classes that would help develop critical and creative thinking skills would also make a difference. Of course that would be expensive so I think at least in public schools there is no chance to enter such a solution. Some really innovative changes should be made in the whole educational system so these school tests could really assess knowledge, thinking and solving problems. Another important thing would be to encourage kids to find their own interests and help them in developing them.

As an adult I also kind of understand teachers. I assume that it's hard when you get 90 kids (I guess that they get even more than 3 groups every year but it's an example) and you have to remember special needs and interest s of every child so it's much easier to treat them as a group. But then every person who is different has to be put out because it causes problems. In my personal experience as a small child I was a very, very fussy eater and my parents were fine with it but when I went to the kindergarten people tried to make me to eat in some really unpleasant ways even though my parents told them EVERY DAY not to make me eat anything I wouldn't like. I know that it doesn't consider being creative but the point is that they couldn't let me eat only what I wanted because then the other kids could also become more picky and it would cause them problems and I know that in other countries they have a very different approach. I feel that teachers here think that they can't have individual requirements for everybody. Maybe if their salaries were higher there would be more teachers with a real passion for teaching and they would help students to be more creative and expressive.
Unknown said…
It's a many way to boost creativity. Hard to admit it but the video games are help to developing our imagination. I think this is the most popular type of way nowadays among young people. Video games could also increase our ability to quickly learn new motor skills.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2797633/playing-video-games-boost-brain-researchers-say-action-games-increase-ability-quickly-learn-new-motor-skills.html

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0813/23082013-Playing-video-games-can-boost-brain-power-Love
PrzemekM said…
After post above it's hard to add something more :).
I agree that is no school, that teach us creativity.

In my opinion problem is great show in this experiment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hkq343NS3nM

Why monkey solved this, and people not?
Becouse we were not taught solving such a problems.


Great polish speech about learning languages, shows that actual learning methos are far from the real needs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78FpZVVEpk8&feature=youtu.be
Unknown said…
This is a good point that teachers are trying to stimulate the creativity of students. They should ask students to task, where solutions aren’t given strictly or determined by the keys.
Students should have been accustomed to making mistakes, because without mistakes there is no success. Everyone learns to make mistakes. people acquire experience when they make mistakes
Unknown said…
I think nowadays there are more schools that try to teach children to be creative. I have heard that Montessori’s schools or the newest one in Warsaw “Wolna Szkola” are very good and teachers have individual approach to every child. So I guess when kid is in this type of school it is a bit of insurance he / she will have enough time for creativity. However, I do not have younger siblings so my opinion is based on rumors.
Unknown said…
the truth is that the books widen our imagination. When we read some describe about people, landscape or something, we create in our brain picture how it may look like. This is the kind of exercises for our brain to be more creative

Games can give us some inspiration to think more effectively. In the virtual world of games we have many solutions to do missions or tasks in games. It is good for develope our imagination.
Unknown said…
"teachers have individual approach to every child" this sentence is very accurate. In normal schools teachers don't pay attention for every students. Students can feel less controlled so they can do less. I mean that they don't show their maximum possibilities and they don't develop.
However, I think that we must remember that children should do more task where answers are open, not only tests with "ABCD" answers. Tests with given answers "abcd" kill creative thinking.
Unknown said…
I think that in school teachers learn us only "right" , "key" solving tasks. It causes that people aren't original and they think not originally. They have a certain kind of mind restriction to do some creative solutions. They are afraid to make mistake.
In refrence to the experiment I want to say that people don't know how to do things, that they have never done in schools.
Unknown said…
These experiments show us that people have restriction mind. Even animals are able to solve these tasks, which people can't. These experiments lampoon people... We should train our brain to thinking more efficiently.
Unknown said…
We should train our creative all the time and don't neglect it. The more we work the more we get - in this case we are more creative.
Julia Osiak said…
To some extent I agree with this article, school does kill kids' creativity. The pressure that is put on us, to be the best and never be at fault, successfully blocks our creativity as very often kids just don't want to stand out from the crowd. From my personal experience I would rather say that all this depends on the teachers. Understandably, most popular for form of teaching is the easiest when supervising a large number of students but with just a little effort the classes can be much more interesting. Instead of blindly following the textbooks, take the kids on a field trip, assign projects that would involve both the subject that is being taught but also give the kids a chance to create something. When learning about integers in elementary school, I had to come up with a board game that would help other kids to understand basic calculations. This is was a lot of fun, I got to be creative but also learn some maths. School doesn't have to kill creativity, the teachers should simply try to engage young students in various activities.
Seisyll said…
In my opinion education shouldn't even have anything to do with creativity. Let's think about it. Right now what you are getting from education is knowledge and tools to use this knowledge. Look at math, biology, science, history and etc. Every single one of those give you specialized knowledge and in some situations as i.e. Math, a set of tools to use this knowledge. There isn't really a place for creativity, as you don't really need it there. The only thing you need is understanding. And fairly speaking I think that education is all about understanding. You can be creative, but when you don't understand the problem creativity won't help you. Also you can have all the knowledge and tools, but when you don't know how to apply them to particular situation then they are useless.

Let's see things as they are. Education is all about teaching people how to understand the world and how to interact with it. Creativity is all about expressing yourself and coming up with new ideas, never mind if they are good or bad. I admit that creativity is important and all, but you can't teach it. You can show how the world works and how to understand it, but you can't show how to come up with ideas that are good. Because, let's face it. Creativity is fun and all, but the only thing that matters are ideas which are good, and you are creative when you come up with something that is good, otherwise it's not creativity, it's just gibberish.
I agree partially that school tends to kill creativity but I am afraid that sometimes it is inevitable. I mean that school is usually so big institution that it is impossible to take care of every child, therefore each child needs cannot be satisfied. That's why there is list of requirements from Ministry of Education which contains what child should already know after finishing certain level of education.

I think that parents should be more responsible and they should develop talents, skills, creativity of their children outside the school because usually you just get a basis in places like that. I am talking from my experience and as I remember I always did something extra after class.
Unknown said…
School in general, has program of teaching and it is adapted to every young person, regardless of sex, interests or ideas for future.

In my opinion, improving ones creativity is really important in life, but everyone should do it in his own time.
rf. said…
Creativity is ability to create something new, right? Well, here's a toughie: none of us is actually creating new things, we just replicate things we saw before. Of course children, with their endless imagination are far better at combining things that don't seem to fit together in the first place. Oh, yes, and I was really harsh saying we create nothing new. Sometimes, some people, do. Do you think you do?
Sylwia said…
I agree that most of schools are killing the creativity in children. However I’m sure that there are some, which are different. I heard about a few extraordinary kindergartens and schools, which curriculum and way of teaching is not standardize. Unfortunately these aren’t state schools… Anyway, because our education system is not ideal, parents should be more involve in their children education to make aware choices and help children finding a efficient way of learning, show them other possibilities and develop interests. Nowadays parents often do nothing besides going to parent-teacher meeting once or twice per term. That is not enough. To me we shouldn’t blame schools only. Parent should be more responsible.
MartaSB said…
I strongly agree that regular schools kill creativity. Fortunately, there are some of them that give students the place to grow and support individual development. In my opinion parents should spend some time doing research before they place their children in a particular school, because their future depends greatly on this choice.
"Most of us would instantly oppose such an opinion in the first place."

I humbly disagree. I think it is quite common to think the opposite. Each public school in this country has motto "make everybody think the same way". Students' creativity cannot be saved or enhanced when the teacher himself/herself is mediocre, uncreative, unqualified, frustrated and unsuccesful person who does not care about students.

Majority of teachers who work in primary schools teachers resemble mentioned image. Computers science is taught by Polish teachers(because nobody after IT studies will work for sort of money public school offers), there is more week hours of Religion than the Science, flunkers are promoted to secondary school so teacher can avoid extra working hours etc.

Until good teachers will be offered more money, nothing will change.
Rafał Banach said…
I agree, nowadays schools just simply kill creativity. We're learning everything and nothing specific. Kids now are more focus on passing the test according to the key answers but no one is showing them how to learn on the mistakes.

Obviously it kills childrens’ creativity because it oblidges them to work and think in previously prepared scheme. You have to do this in this way not the other. When in school we are often given explanations on a plate instead of trying to come up with the solutions ourselves. Sometimes lessons are so boring that we even don’t bother to think and create at all. In my opinion school does not rewad those who are individuals and who work in a more creative way. That’s why school doesn’t prepare us to be real life, in which it’s not enought to learn something by heart. I agree with you that working under preassure can kiil creativity. If you want to create a new value you simply must think outside the box. During that process you can easliy make mistakes. How would I ensure that my won child has enught time to be creative? Hmm…I think the most importatn thing is to manage to spend as much time with the child as possible in order to stimulate curiosity and therefore creativity...
Unknown said…
I'm not sure how it was in high school, because I have that vague feeling that the classes were slightly more focused on our creativity, especially maths or physics, but I'm pretty convinced that creativity is constantly being killed during studies (I haven't finished PJWSTK for my first degree). I feel that it is not about understanding the subject, but understanding how to trick professor. One's you understood his pattern you won, because you know how to pass exams, but not really know what the course is about.
Michal Kulesza said…
Another thing is that the school is not to make you creative. In my opinion creativity is the thing you have to develop by yourself.

School is only for extending your knowledge, training your memory and learn to use instructions to solve problems.
Unknown said…
I agree with all of you guys, school does kill creativity!
And you have to think by scheme all time.

And here are some interesting links about creativity:
http://www.parenting.com/blogs/mom-congress/melissa-taylor/how-raise-creative-child
http://blogs.wsj.com/juggle/2012/05/24/creative-kids-not-kits/
Unknown said…

I think it's wrong to say that school kills creativity. It would probably be more fair to say that school doesn't encourage you to be creative. So if you focus to much on school and ignore other activities or hobbies, you are killing your creativity by yourself. School just doesn't need you to be creative.
I like your argument, I haven't thought about it that way…I think school should be about creativity as well:P
Exactly..They are afriad or maybe too lazy because they are not encourage to do some things in a different way
Unknown said…
School often kills creativity, but I believe our university in most cases didn't. What most people find is that their jobs kill creativity, when in school and university people imagine that they can do anything, then they go to work to do mundane tasks the way they are defined to be done - that is the creativity killer. Avoid such jobs ;-)

Popular posts from this blog

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and naturally.

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?