Skip to main content

Week 8 [11.05 - 17.05] The Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles

Starting in 80 CE, residents of Rome and visitors from across the Roman Empire would fill the stands of the Colosseum to see gladiators duel, animals fight and chariots race around the arena. And for the grand finale, water poured into the arena basin, submerging the stage for the greatest spectacle of all: staged naval battles. Janelle Peters details the history of these mock maritime encounters.



1.  Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?
2.   If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?
3.   If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?

Comments

Ela said…
1. I’ve heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum and organized naval battles. In those days it must have made an amazing impression, a water reservoir on request and with ships. Usually, people who want to be considered as a strong leaders do unusual things, so I don't think it was excessive.

2. I hate watching people fighting so if similar events were to take place there I wouldn’t definitely go there.

3. I would choose a direct fight with a man, I think I would have any chance of survival.
Karol Michalak said…
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?
I've heard about this before, but didn't think about naked swimmers. No idea why I only portrait it as fighting place.

2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?
Yes, why not. Not only because it is legal, but I like to try new stuff and I would love to try this type of entertainment if it would be easy to get inside.

3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?
Fighting in the group can make it far easier than being defeated by much more bigger and skilled enemy on one versus one combat.
Adam Tokarczyk said…
1. Yes, and I don't think it was exaggeration. If it was built with possibility to flood it, then do so. There weren't many entertainments in the past so such unusual sight would obviously boost rulers image and popularity.

2. I have always liked to watch martial arts, so such thing would be amazing for me. I just wonder if we think about its original shape where people died, or more mild thing where you fight till one surrenders or referee stopes the fight. First scenario would probably be more popular and maybe we could send there some politicians, for example as a penalty for ruining country, to have even more fun.

3. It depends on fight formula or rather its possible outcome. I'd probably have most fun if I could go 1 v 1 while dual wielding, but then I'd most likely die... Reconstructing battles could be nice as well and maybe we could omit dying part there, especially if chosen for victorious group.
Viktor Ryś said…
1.
No, haven't heard about that. I always depicted the Colosseum as a primitive arena that didn't had any complex features like filling it with water. I love the concept of it though, sure it was a little exaggerated but that arena was something unique in that time on earth.

2.
Yes, I think that it would be an unforgetable experience. I don't like blood that much, but the atmosphere on that arena must have been amazing. Witnessing a theater play would be the best in my opinion.

3.
Probably in a battle with wild animals.
I had no idea that Colosseum was flooded! This is the first time I ever hear about it. I think it is amazing that in those time people were able to do such things. Is it exaggeration? Maybe but the things we do for power and glory… I was in the Colosseum once before and it looks awesome, but truth is that it is not the same as it was before. ☹ But if Colosseum were active and legal, I think that I would be tempted to go and watch. It is barbaric no questions asked but still it would be interesting. If I was a gladiator and I would be forced to fight but still had a possibility to choose I would most definitely choose these duels where my opponents are much smaller and much less skilled then me.
1. Yes, a history teacher told me when I was in high school. Is this an exaggeration? I would not say - rather a form of entertainment. I think that if sport were not so popular today, it would not be a form of entertainment - people would still watch gladiatorial fights or sea clashes at huge stadiums.

2. Of course! In my opinion every stadium could be compared to the Colosseum. For example, the National Stadium in Warsaw - it hosts conferences, matches, concerts, festivals, dance and automotive events, various fairs, and in the winter it becomes an ice rink. Its purpose is to provide people with entertainment, which is why it is like the Colosseum.

3. I'm not good at sword fighting. I think I would like to participate in a naval battle, it would be a great experience, of course, if I survived.
Interesting presentation. Answering your questions:

1. Oh man, I've never heard the Romans flood the Coliseum for naval battles? I am really surprised that it was so. What do I think about it? Wow, they had really great ideas. In general, I thought that there were only gladiator fights.

2. If colosseum were active and legal again I would definitely go out there and watch the gladiator fights! I love that!

3. Tough question. But I would boldly risk fighting with swords.
Yubin said…
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?
What a coincidence, I also mentioned the Colosseum when I commented on other presentations today. I haven't heard about the sea battles in the Colosseum, I thought everything in Colosseum was only like what I had watched in the movie Gladiator.

2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?
Yes, for example, I would like to watch bands playing there, but if you are talking about watch gladiators kill each other there, then no, definitely no, it would be too scary.

3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?
I would choose sword fighting, better 2 vs 2, and choose a talented guy to be a teammate.
You probably wouldn't have any major problems getting in, after all the coliseum was huge. Group fights seem safer and easier but if you have weaker people in your group then it can be reversed quickly.
So, the atmosphere would probably be something like when you are sitting at a football game at a stadium among drunk football fans/hooligans in the jersey of the opposing team that won. Fighting with animals hmm I hope not with a rabbit ?? or some other fluffy animal :P.
I see you probably had a good history teacher, I don't remember my teacher ever mentioning such trivia. Ahh yes National Stadium in Warsaw, now that you mentioned I remember it was also flooded once, another similarity.
Thanks.
The sword is a great weapon, like most people, I would probably also choose it, well more precisely I would choose a short sword because of its weight and a shield.
It's a great idea to pick someone talented for 2v2 fight, even better if he could fight 1v2 but men I didn’t think about this.
Strong leaders, yes, they like to think that they have everything under their control and can do everything… hmm but well if we look at the golden age of Rome, then they were right… mostly.
Bad politicians fighting in the coliseum this is a great idea, let's call them "Hunger games" like in the movie, only we will send everyone who causes major crises in the world instead of poor people. Have you contributed to world hunger? then fight for us now.
It's nice that you visited the Colosseum in person, congratulations. I wonder if they will ever decide to restore the Coliseum to its former glory but on the other hand, going there later to McDonald would spoil the whole atmosphere.
So, you would choose a blind child with a cane as an opponent?? ... you savage XD
MichalB said…
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?

The Romans were able to flood the Coliseum up to 1.5 meters deep in 7 hours. At that time staging of sea battles took place there. I think it's an exaggeration, but Roman emperors were strange and sick.

2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?

Of course, if only there are such possibilities, I am going to Rome to see the Colosseum, among others. I've seen it smaller in Pula (Croatia) is cool too.

3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?

I hope that the gladiatorial times will not come back.
Agnieszka Duda said…
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?
The story rings a bell. However, I was not aware of the scale of the flooding. In my imagination I was expecting swimming contests, not full-blown naval battles. This is not an exaggeration at all!

2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?
I would have to look at the program. Some performances would not be acceptable nowadays. Human and animal rights activists would not let gladiator battles or animal fights to take place. Watching ballet in the Colosseum could still be enjoyable though.

3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?
Imagine cross-century duels, where a contemporary soldier is faced against, for example, a knight from medieval times. Semi-automatic assault riffle vs double-edged sword. Who would win?
Klaudia Kozioł said…
1. I haven’t heard of see battles in Colosseum before and I have to admit that this is very impressive to create architecture and water infrastructure like this back then.
2. I don’t think so, watching fights is not my thing and I don’t see point in this sort of entertainment.
3. I guess that if I was forced to fight as gladiator, I wouldn’t have choice on what type of duel would It be. My duel of choice would be not to take part in such thing.
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?

No, I haven't. That is very interesting! We always seek for better entertaining. But it could be an exaggeration.

2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?

Well, I never even went to a normal stadium so I think that it's very unlikely for me to go to the colosseum. But I was there when I was inactive.

3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?

With a spear. But I think that my fate would be a quick death, sadly. I am not a very good fighter.
Roman Burlaka said…
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?
Yeah, I've heard about it many years ago. Without TV and Internet it is not the worst way to entertain even if it comsume a lot of time to create such conditions. Better than war, you know, imho.

2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?
Once or twice maybe. I hardly ever go to watch football match or box, but it's not rare for me to watch them on TV, so I will definetely watch some colosseum battles on it.

3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?
A spear and a special shield. Best choice against all those swordsmen up there.
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?

I haven't heard about it but I know that our ancestors had a "strange" way of entertaining themselves.

2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?

Deffinitly no - It is barbarity.

3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?

It depends. I would make strategic choice based on my biggest chances to survive.
Grzegorz Rostek said…
1. This is the first time I have heard about this, and i think that it is fascinating. I don't think this is an exaggeration, the video explained it well and it seems that flooding colosseum would be possible.

2. I definitely wouldn't watch any sort of fight or execution. But those weren't the only things shown in colosseum, and if there would be anything else to watch, like musical performance, i would like to see it.

3. I don't really know, maybe a sword fight. I don't believe i would stand a chance in a fight with a real gladiator, but at least i would have an opportunity to use a sword in a real fight.
1. Yes :) that's one of my favourite fun facts! In my opinion, it's served its purpose perfectly. It was meant to show the greatness of Rome and made people fear to get at the bad side of Romans. Besides, it is technologically impressive even for today's times.

2. It would have to be more humane. No animals and no fights to the death, then I would watch it gladly :)

3. That's a tough one. Maybe I would choose to fight a lion and try to make friends with it? They were starved and scared so I don't suppose it would be possible, but imagine me riding my lion out of the arena!
Jakub Kisiała said…
1. Yes, I have heard about it. I think it is cool if they could do this. It must have been great show. But I'm interested of technical details. How they have succeeded to seal building this size in their times.

2. It think I could go there. It would be interesting experience, but I rather don't encourage to brutal. I think my presence there could affect growing of that industry. So I don't know what I would do.

3. I would rather not to. But if I were forced, I would prefer one to one i think. It is most suitable for fair battle.
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?

Yes, I have. I think that this must have been an amazing show to watch. Exaggeration has nothing to do with it. If there were people who wanted to see this and there were people who were able to make it happen then why not? I think that this fact should be appreciated much more.

2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?

I have once in my life seen Corrida and since that day my point of view for such things has changed completely. There would be part of me which would like to see such thing but on the other hand I would know that this is wrong and such thing shouldn't be taking place. The only thing that I have taken out of this bull fight that I saw was that it was such a waste of an animals life.

3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?

Sea fight, definately. If I had to fight I would at least try to make it as epic as can be so why not to use a ship for that purpose.
1. I have heard about this before, but I was not aware that Romans did it on such a scale, and I was not aware how they managed to flood the colosseum in such a way ( nowadays with the help of technology it's nothing unusual but a few thousand years ago?
2. Sure, maybe leaving aside animal fights because it's just idiocy but gladiatorial fights using today's technology to protect their health and life ? If somebody would manage to do that, I would love to go see such a fight
3. I never thought about it, but if I had to, I'd probably choose a sword and a shield seem to be the most universal and safest combination
Oskar Kacprzak said…
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?
Yes, I've heard of it. I wouldn't call the shows battles, more like skirmishes. It's not exaggeration. People demanded show, and people paid for it, engineers from that time made it happen.
2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?
Why not, we watch weird things on the internet all the time, and sometimes we pay for it so whats the difference so why not see this irl.
3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you choose?
I would prefer Murmillo armament - sword, shield, helmet and long bracer. This kind of equipment gives you compromise between protection and mobility, but little lacks range.
1. No, I've never heard of it, so I don't think that's true. It sounds too surreal to me
2. No, although it is not the same, it can be compared to a zoo. Giving something interest supports it, and this form of fight is bad.
3. Due to the fact that strength is not my strength, I would choose a 2 vs 2 fight and hope my partner is strong
1. Yes i have heard about it but i don’t know any specifics. I think this may be an exaggeration because i modern days is not so easy to do so.
2. Yes of course, there is nothing better than a public fights to the death.
3. I don’t think i may have an options to choose, but if i could i would a water duel to see how was it like.
Rafał Halama said…
1. Have you ever heard that the Romans flooded the Colosseum for sea battles? do you think this is an exaggeration?
This does sound like an unreal thing to do, but ancient people were actually doing such impressive things, I can give them the benefit of doubt for this one.
2. If colosseum were active and legal again would you go to watch?
My curiosity wouldn't let me miss such an opportunity.
3. If you were forced to fight as a gladiator in Colosseum, what type of duels would you
choose?
I would choose 1 vs 1 duel, so I don't have to focus on few enemies simultaneously.
Maciej Górczak said…
1.I have never heard of it, it's very interesting. I don't think it is an exaggeration, Romans used to do a lot of weird stuff back then, I wouldn't be surprised if it actually happened.`

2.I think I might have been to curious not to go - it just seems so out of this world!

3.I think I would fight against another gladiator. Maybe he would happen to have a bad day and I that would give me a better chance to win. Who knows.

Popular posts from this blog

Week 11 [03-09.06.2019] The problem with ecological cars emission in UK

The problem with ecological cars emission in UK Since the adoption of the European Emission Allowance Directive in the European Parliament, all car makers have tried to submit. Since 1992, the Euro I standard has been in force, which limited the emission of carbon monoxide to the atmosphere. The Euro VI standard currently applies, which limits the series of exhaust gases. These include: hydrocarbons, nitrogen and carbon oxides, and dust.   The most significant change was brought by the Euro IV standard. For the first time it introduced the limitation of nitrogen oxides, which are responsible for the harmful compounds of smog.   What is smog?   Smog consists of sulfur oxides, nitrogen and carbon. In addition, solid substances such as suspended dust (PM). Dust suspend in atmospheric aerosols may be in liquid and solid form. These can be particles of sea salt, clouds from the Sahara and artificial compounds made by people. These compounds often come fr

Week 12 (12.01-18.01.15) Are you an early bird or a night owl ?

Owls are nocturnal creatures. They’re wide awake at night and they sleep during the day. If this sounds like bliss to you, then, like about 20 percent of the population who find themselves most active at around 9 pm, you may fall into the same category as our feathered friend. Night owls often have difficulty waking up in the morning, and like to be up late at night.  Studies of animal behaviour indicate that being a night owl may actually be built into some people’s genes. This would explain why those late-to-bed, late-to-rise people find it so difficult to change their behaviour. The trouble for night owls is that they just have to be at places such as work and school far too early. This is when the alarm clock becomes the night owl’s most important survival tool. Experts say that one way for a night owl to beat their dependence on their alarm clocks is to sleep with the curtains open. The Theory is that if they do so, the morning sunlight will awaken them gently and naturally.

Week 4 [06-12.11.2017] This is what happens when you reply to spam email.

James Veitch is a British comedian. In today’s Ted Talk James with characteristic for himself a sense of humor shows how he deals with spam emails and why responding to junk messages may be sometimes dangerous. Questions: What do you think about James’s  way of dealing with spam? Why are junk messages legal, even though it sometimes may be a fraud? Dou you have a problem with spam? How do you deal with with it?